Jump to content
Just visiting?

a-k

Established Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,751

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by a-k

    Irreverentad's Fantasy Premier League 2023/24

    in Games and Gaming

    Posted

    24 minutes ago, tomav84 said:

    i can't wait to sell him. will probably be when i wildcard though. certain players just never do it for me whenever i've owned them throughout the years, him and bruno are the main ones that just never get me returns whenever i own them

    Currently moved him to the bench for the next GW. The -4 to bring him in for the DGW has backfired. Need to free up some funds with another -4 to bring in Salah the following GW. Still have the WC but trying to hold onto it until we know more about the upcoming BGW and DGW.

    Irreverentad's Fantasy Premier League 2023/24

    in Games and Gaming

    Posted

    32 minutes ago, bickster said:

    Haaland TC yes most definitely If only because you'll lose out massively if he hauls as an awful lot of players are doing just that

    On Palmer, I think you're point is very valid and if I can afford a suitable replacement I may use my other FT this week on just that.

    Haaland - I guess the other possibility is gambling on a DGW37 against FUL and BHA who are probably on the beach already while MCI are thick in a title fight

    Palmer - With needing to fix the new Trent problem, it would be a -4 for me, but I think I'll do it. Of course, I have Dougie at a similar price, but Palmer + KDB + Saka in midfield is too template for me 😁

    Match Thread: FAC4: Chelsea v Villa

    in FAC4: Chelsea a

    Posted · Edited by a-k

    Didn't even celebrate, knew it would be chalked off for something.

    Probably the right decision in the end, but don't think I've ever seen a ref just take the VAR's word for ruling out a goal without going to the screen for something other than offside??

    The Video Assistant Referee (VAR)

    in Other Football

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, foreveryoung said:

    Yeah I know this. But it must be worded wrong, as VAR have no power to rule out anything, they can only advise the ref and then he makes the decision. This is where VAR is going worng

    VAR should be able to advise on everything, saying they couldn't even mention it to the ref, is just get out of jail free card, load of bollecks really

    I think they are so worried about what they "can" and "can't" do that they lose common sense about what they are supposed to be there for in the first place.

    • Like 1

    The Video Assistant Referee (VAR)

    in Other Football

    Posted

    On 21/01/2024 at 18:41, foreveryoung said:

    Is the Toney moving the ball incident not proof of VAR not consentrating on the game. Surely they would have advised the ref, Toney moved the ball if they had seen it. Yes other teams do it, but not generally to the extent Toney did it, he actually moves it twice. If VAR saw the incident I would have expected them to advise and the goal not to be given.

    They were not allowed to intervene

    Quote

    Nottingham Forest have been informed by the referees' organisation that the video assistant referee did not have the power to rule out Brentford's disputed equaliser on Saturday.

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/68085491

×
×
  • Create New...
Â