Jump to content

Eastie

Established Member
  • Posts

    7,752
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by Eastie

  1. Agreed , social media probably a place to avoid for a few days until it’s all done and dusted - I’ll be glad when it’s all over and things have unravelled .
  2. He goes if he wants to go ? You will probably find that there is a release clause and thst is the only way city can get him - we will see . Thst is the only reason villa would sell if their hands are tied - anyone who thinks city would pay over £100m is in cuckoo land - I hate it , but city would not be pursuing jack if they were not well aware of the price and whether he wants the move .
  3. I believe there is a clause or city would not even be pursuing him as they know villa would not sell - as per Percy article on page 2700 he believes there to be a release clause and so do many other journalists . without a clause city wouldn’t even be after him
  4. Yes I’d hate to lose him but I’d understand why and wish him all the best - not against us tho
  5. Did we not try for smith -Rowe and ward-prowse ? Not for want of trying
  6. I think He will if city pay £100m sadly Which I’m sure city have known for a while
  7. Depends on who we bring in - the key is good recruitment - I’ve been here before with Andy gray , platt, yorke and others - we can build better with the right players , that is the key to moving forward
  8. Man City will not pay over £100m for Jack grealish - of that I’m sure , maybe they think they could get him for £90m but not a chance in hell . I agree with you regarding city chasing him that there must be some sort of clause otherwise they would have known villa would not sell - hopefully we get this sorted over the weekend and city put up or shut up .
  9. Exactly - they’d probs try their luck but they’d be well aware of the situation to even be in for him - certainly no way they’d pay over £100m but remember it’s what jacks value may have been a year ago when he signed the deal - obviously his value has risen in the last year but I’d expect a year ago a clause of £100m to be realistic - percy said he believed there was a substantial release clause in his article wgich I posted on page 2700 of the thread so I’d be very surprised if under £100m my feeling is city will prioritise a striker now
  10. Don’t buy that al all , without a release clause city won’t have a hope in hell of getting him and they’d know it
  11. No way city would pay anywhere near that They wouldn’t be interested - I believe percy when said he believed there is a release clause and I doubt it would be over £100m as it would be grealish and his agents who’d want it putting in . I think if city pay £100m they get him - for me it’s grealish or Kane as I don’t think they can get both - still far from convinced city would pay £100m
  12. Why does it? City know the price - probably be £100m If there was no release clause I don’t think city would have a hope in hell of getting him . whether city would pay £100m I guess depends on whether they think Kane is gettable too I think if city pay £100m they get Jack - but I’m far from convinced they will pay it
  13. 4th biggest team in Lancashire - they have an inferiority complex
  14. Away kit launch is tomorrow , wonder if Jack will be parading it ?
  15. Not sure about that , if we finish 6th and get into Europe then surely there would be grounds to stay for a top 4 push the following season ? I would hope if we got into Europe he’d be happy to stay and kick on with us ?
  16. I agree the midfield certainly needs sorting but looks like smith is trying to sort it with the bids for Jwp and smith-Rowe , hopefully he gets someone in of that ilk
  17. Sam lee seems to be unravelling the last couple of days - if grealish stays at villa he will need to lay low for a while
×
×
  • Create New...
Â