Jump to content
Just visiting?

Oaks

Established Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,375

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Oaks

  1. Oaks

    Best Bond?

    Oaks replied to thefeet1980's topic in Off Topic

    The problem with Brosnan was he wasn't "elegant" he was slimy. You watch his interaction with Berry in Die another day, and you realise he had to go. Dalton was a great Bond, because as with Craig, he could act, so brought depth to the roll there previous "actors" couldn't bring.
  2. Oaks

    Best Bond?

    Oaks replied to thefeet1980's topic in Off Topic

    didn't really take a genuis casting director. Anyone who has seen Layer Cake (great film) would have realised that Craig would make an excellent Bond. Did you really think that when watching Layer Cake Jon....Hmmmm? :winkold: Anyway there is a lot of difference between thinking he would make a good Bond and putting your money/reputation where your mouth is, for that reason he/she deserves cudos! I did i remember coming out of the cinema really enjoying Layer Cake and saying, he could be a very good Bond, but i never expected him to get it because of his look.
  3. Oaks

    Best Bond?

    Oaks replied to thefeet1980's topic in Off Topic

    Ican't believe that Brosnan has 4 votes. Lazenby did more for Bond in 1 film than Brosnan did in 4. Brosnan has the look of what bond should look like, but thats it. He wasn't even a good enough actor to pull Bond off. Dalton is way underrated outside Bond fans. Lazenby stared in what might be the best Bond film. Although he wasn't that good himself, On her majesty's secret service is the most underrated Bond film there is. Connery and Moore are still the Kings though for different reasons.
  4. Oaks

    Best Bond?

    Oaks replied to thefeet1980's topic in Off Topic

    Come on who voted for Brosnan? Are you having a laugh?
  5. Oaks
    Been at the club for 10 years, so yes he deserves a testimonial. But i wouldn't go.
  6. Oaks
    A point about the kits. Do you think it will be possible to be out before the summer holidays, because i never get to wear my new Villa top on my summer jollys. In the past, sometimes its not out before the start of the season. I always got jealous of other fans showing off there new kits, and not ours.
  7. Oaks
    I want them to stay down another 2 years, and miss out on the new premiership money and lose there parashoot payments too, while we are getting better and hopfully get into europe and then the champions league and then let them up o we can piss all over them.
  8. Oaks
    I feel its mostly to do with Genetics, but that does open a can of worms too, because if the "cure" is found, wouldn't most Gays have the cure? Especailly around the difficult teen years.
  9. Oaks
    I pledge £20 to VillaTalk of we break the £10 million barrier on 1 player in the summer. I already owe £20 because we signed 3 permanent deals in the January window, so i hope to pay another one in the summer, and i hope its for Darren Bent.
  10. Oaks
    Agree i like them 3 alot more.
  11. Oaks
    There was not a better answer to my question thanks
  12. Oaks
    I can honestly say i dont hate West Brom. Why? Well since ive been a fan(88-89) They have never beaten us. They have never looked close to beating us. Most of there fans are not retarded unlike the Small Heath Vermin. As for Wolves. My mate is a Wolves fan, he seems to think Villa and Wolves, and West Brom and Small Heath have a similar sort of respect for each other. I disagree. He doesnt call Wolves just Wolves, he calls them the mighty Wolves, which pretty much sums there fans.
  13. Oaks
    No. No one payed that money for him.
  14. Oaks
    The full backs, in my opinion are still the least important positions on the pitch. To spend £15+million on one baffles me, it really does(unless your chelsea of course).
  15. Oaks
    I point you in the direction of Gareth Bale, 12 million of your finest. Now THATS stupid money for a full back. Micah Richards? £15m is a bit steep, I'd say closer to £10m and he'll be seen as a bargin within 2 years. I'd love him, but it aint gonna happen. Nope a stupid price for a full back.
  16. Oaks
    Stupid price for a full back.
  17. Oaks
    yeah blame someone else for his poor form. Lee should look squarely at himself. He had great natural ability, just not the heart or the head to be great. Im not too disappointed Lee is leaving, he should have done 2 years ago. As for a testimonial, it could be the worst attended one ever. I can't see more the 3,000 turning up. How sad is that.
  18. Oaks
    Dear Genaral, What are your opinions on Platini's plans to reduce the amount of clubs in the champions league. Does this affect the so called 5 year plan? Yours Oaks.
  19. Oaks
    I dont know whether we will sign any more, because all 3 signings were strong rumors.
  20. Oaks
    You herd it here first.......................................ish.
  21. Oaks
    Ive just herd a rumor we might be swapping Baros for John Carew. I'll get back you you when i here more.
  22. Oaks
    I doubt it. The 3 main problem areas going into the window were, right full back, (Bardsley), right midfield(Young) and a striker. Only 1 yet to fill(if we get Young), and its been a decent months of business, in my opinion.
  23. Oaks
    West ham haven't yet signed anyone i would want, but they do seem to have more money to spunk away, so i hope they go down.
  24. Oaks
    still 2 hours left Jez
  25. Oaks
    Why?
×
×
  • Create New...
Â