Jump to content

Thug

Established Member
  • Posts

    3,137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Thug

  1. oh don’t you worry, I’ll find that video for you.. and then you will apologise, and admit that the Israeli government are not putting the hostages first.
  2. not the exact video I was referring to, which I shall continue to look for around the 2:35 minute mark: American reporter before you start debunking it.
  3. Wow ive seen this tactic somewhere before… not quite sure where….
  4. Woah, that was reported by an American news channel. not my framing. let me find the YouTube video And what is it with you and your obsession with trying to catch me out? Ive said a million times the hostages need to be released. Hell, they shouldn’t have been taken in the first place. I want them released. As soon as possible, without conditions. No doubt Hamas put conditions on their release, but the Israeli side have so far refused to negotiate. There have been Israeli officials on tv That have quite clearly stated they will not negotiate with terrorists. What framing did I use?
  5. They know where they are. Hamas have offered to release them. The Israeli government have refused this offer. The release of the hostages is the polar opposite of what they want. They are desperate for the hostages to die in captivity so that they can use that as an excuse to continue the bombardment. stick the posters up on the Israeli embassy wall where they can be seen by the people that can actually bring them home.
  6. if you’re going to be pedantic, then so am I. The party that forms government is usually the one that wins the election, with its leader being APPOINTED as prime minister. The leader of the party is ELECTED by members of the party. Ergo: Prime ministers ARE elected in this country. So don’t repeat your nonsense. Next time please clarify which electorate you are referring to avoid people getting the wrong impression of the voting system. Less pedantic answer: The last two prime ministers were not APPOINTED by the residing monarch after the PARTY THEY REPRESENTED had won a controlling majority number of seats in a general election with its present leader in office. I apologise whole-heartedly to anyone that read my nonsense and was ready to take up arms against the establishment. I wrongly gave the impression that the leader of a political party has an influence on voting patterns. I was wrong to suggest that if a political party wins an ELECTION that the natural progression from the result of this election would be the said leader of said party being appointed prime minister. It is entirely possible that the monarch may choose not to do this. I was therefore incorrect to suggest that they would have been Elected into office. The correct way to have said this would have been to say that prime minister had been APPOINTED into the role after being ELECTED as leader of their party and then the party to have won the election whilst this person was in charge of the party. Hell, I may even be wrong about what I wrote above, but I’m sure I’ll soon find out, and apologise for it too. we cool now?
  7. Neither of last 2 were elected. The one before that had his opposition labelled as a psychopath not worthy or able to rule. oh the irony.
  8. I don’t think he said they ‘were’ propganda. He was referring to the perception of it being propaganda. Can’t really produce evidence without asking the perpetrator to explain their thoughts at the time
  9. Apparently had cut off all food, water and fuel supply so McDonalds heroically stepped in. Shame on those people asking for a boycott.
  10. What is TRULY fascinating is those that support Israel seem to exhibit the same self centred beliefs of the country itself. They will do everything to highlight there own suffering, but refuse to acknowledge anyone else’s no matter how many more times horrific it may be. Ripping posters off a wall: the only civilised response is to find it sickening. when asked about the civilised response to cutting off water supply to 2m.people? Silence. There is an inherent racism in the way some posters make their posts. Ripping posters from walls should be condemned and is uncivilised. Cutting water supplies you ignore and champion. I have no respect for anyone that does not value life, and people are showing themselves for what they are. will you answer? What the ONLY civilised response to someone cutting off water supplies to 2m people is before you start judging the moral bankruptcy of others? Thank you. Let’s see if you ignore it for a second time.
  11. Agreed. what is the only civilised reaction a person can have to water being cut off to 2 million people?
  12. That’s a lot of angry countries. 153 million countries. I’d still hedge my bets israel would smash 153 million countries. No attrition needed.
  13. To be fair, when there is a tragedy, there is usually more than one mistake, and ergo more than one party to blame. So he wasn’t ‘shifting blame’ rather ‘distributing’ it. With the obvious advantage of hindsight, would you not agree that the potential risks were not fully assessed and therefore it was a mistake? Or maybe they WERE fully assessed, but the assessment was wrong.
  14. He’s obviously been taught the concept of backtracking after doing damage is easy.
  15. Yo, magnkarl. Out of curiosity… would you classify current conflict as a war of attrition? just asking, no reason.
  16. Ok, dear private. I did not say that ‘war of attrition’ is a concept that does not exist. I do think that if you believe this current conflict to genuinely be a war of attrition then I shall need to post hundreds upon hundreds of ROFL emojis. So I ask you to reaffirm your GENUINE belief, that this is a war of attrition so that I can stop debating with you and forgive your previous posts based on some previous brain injury or similar explanation.
  17. Lol, why won’t you answer dude? come on man, not a hard question. Ok let’s even it up a bit. Israel has to be blindfolded. Heck, BANGLADESH just joined in! israel 9m blindfolded. vs Indonesia, Nigeria, Bangladesh. 664m fully fed & watered. Who's gonna win?
  18. It wasn’t in the slightest bit amusing. That was an Ironic laugh. Only a ‘total moron’ would not see that. There is NOTHING amusing about death. You, and a couple of other posters continue to justify Israel’s methods, and continue to promote this BULLSHIT self defence rhetoric. I haven’t seen ANY posts justifying what Hamas did. I see plenty of posts continuing to give justification of the brutal response. I have no issue with the state of Israel, or Jewish people, but you guys seem to imply it at EVERY opportunity you can muster. I have a pretty MAJOR issue with the ONGOING slaughter under the guise of self defence. The ONLY morons in this space are the ones that bring up words like white supremacy and naziism for any any criticism of those ‘who can do no wrong.’ I can’t be arsed to go back through your posts, so maybe you can clarify for me now whether you support the ongoing genocide and blockade of essential humanitarian supplies. Then I will judge about whether you are a moron or not.
  19. @Tumblerseven so you laugh at my suggestion of population size not being relevant in a war. ok, israel (9 million) vs Indonesia (275.5m) deathmatch. where’s your money? Come on man, you can answer this one. You know you can. Give it a go. wait let me add in Nigeria. 218m israel 9m vs Indonesia 275 + Nigeria 218 : total 493m Go!
  20. The same cause it has always been. To take the entire land of Palestine and Jordan for itself.
  21. Utter nonsense, irrelevant post. We are not talking about warfare of WW1. We are not talking about heroic soldiers putting their lives on the line where sheer numbers matter. Wars these days are won by computers, not humans. Israels 9 million could beat the Middle East’s 200 million without breaking sweat. You know it, I know it, and Biden knows it. But he’s still sending $100bn to them - probably to pay for the propaganda because I don’t know what equipment they need? Large populations these days are a hinderance, not an advantage. One American warship could probably win this war. Population : few hundred I’d guess.
  22. And yet more. i have said MULTIPLE times that Israel have every right to exist, and it’s people to lead a peaceful life not threatened at all times. I have stated multiple times that what Hamas did was horrific. im laughing at your statement about ‘main cause’ If you want to try to portray me as some white supremacist nazi for not wanting an entire population decimated under the bullshit disguise of self defence then more power to you. ok, now that you have listed populations of the world, I’d be grateful if you could now post military budgets too. Thanks in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â