switters

Weimann MOTM for producing the only exciting moment in the match (with a slight nod to Ireland for the quick one-two assist). The game was awful. Neither side showed any really attacking skill or took control of the match. No sustained pressure. Just scrappy and mind-numbingly boring. The equalizer was predictable. Huth always seems to score against us. If we really did have less possession than Stoke, that should be a sackable offence right away.

Should be alright, but in a bad scenario (we lose Man Utd and Sunderland, Bolton beat Swansea), Bolton would be coming to Villa 3 points behind us. And QPR & Blackburn both have 3 winnable fixtures. So we could be dragged back into the mix if they all hit form but it's looking unlikely now. Nevertheless our points tally isn't good enough. Struggling to hit 40 pts is a relegation-type performance over the season, whether or not we go down..

1 win in 10. Man Utd up next. Sunderland is going to be a big one.

Same, except I wonder if he might put Hutton at CB rather than Baker. Lichaj did more than Baker to keep his spot and I've a feeling Hutton has covered CB here and there in his career.

Just humour me.... but whats he correcting? Well, The finance issues are by far the biggest that the club faces at the moment, he's correcting the wage bill, changing the transfer policy, increasing commercial revenue etc etc. Football will suffer during this time, maybe that's why McLeish got the job I must have have missed all this. Attendances are down, and will slump further next season - against that I can't see commercial revenue increasing. I suppose your right about the wages - but thats pretty easy to do (sell your best players) - on a value point - i reckon Ashley young on £50k per week - was better value than Hutton on £30k per week Attendances are meaningless in modern football. Nonsense. Money from matchday accounts for somewhere between a quarter and a third of the club's income. It's become proportionally less important with the rise of TV money, but far from meaningless. The more attendances drop, the less we can afford in the wagebill.

Expect Heskey and Albrighton back in for Bannan and Weimann. Maybe Zog instead, if he's fit. Liverpool will view this as ideal fixture to get over their dodgy form. We should feel likewise, but unfortunately McLeish will have the attitude that a draw is best we can hope for and we have to save ourselves for home game against Stoke, which he will be even more afraid of losing.

McLeish finally wins something: http://www.football365.com/topical-top-10/7647727/Top-Ten-Hated-By-Their-Own-Fans More of this please, media.

Since Bolton and Wigan have just managed it, us and QPR are now the only clubs who haven't managed to win 2 in a row this season. Even worse, we haven't managed at any point this season to win 2 out of 3 consecutive league matches (QPR have just managed this in their last 3). It's as if every time we get a win, we've got our quota for the month and draws are the best we can try for in the next couple of matches. Aug: 1 win/3 matches Sep: 0/3 Oct: 1/4 Nov: 1/3 Dec: 2/6 Jan: 1/3 Feb: 0/4 Mar: 1/4

Cant understand why it would be too late?? Probably in the sense that it would be difficult, to get another manager in and try and fix the mess, McLeish has brought us in. But I would rather another manager came in and tried to win a couple of games, instead of trying to scrape a couple of 0-0 games home. Only 7 games left, I beleive we could get a better manager if we wait until and summer and get someone good in. Any manager appointed now would either be a caretaker or panic appointment. I want Mcleish out but lets let him have the final 7 games. We thought that about last summer But I do agree that there's no point replacing him at this stage of the season. He has to see this mess through and then hopefully will resign/be sacked following the last day of the season (whether or not we stay up).

Regardless of the strength of the squad, the question the media should be throwing at McLeish is 'Have you got the best out of the squad you have had at your disposal?'. I don't think he could answer 'yes' honestly. We lost good players but McLeish seems to have taken 'transitional season' as meaning that decline is acceptable and expected - and that attitude comes out in the way we've played. Transition implies some plan for progression. This season has given little evidence of one.

I had to laugh at this from the Mail: At least he's realistic enough to drop his expectations once he becomes manager

Whenever he talks about tactics, he only ever seems to focus on things he didn't tell the players to do. He doesn't seem to have any coherent strategy of what they should actually do, and that's what shows through every time we play. Whoever was interviewing him should have demanded he expand on what "other qualities" the players have..

I think the problem he's had since the driving thing is that he only has small chances to impress & regain his spot - and when he's on the pitch he's over-ambitious with his passing in his desperation to try to make his mark. He was starting to look good when he had a run of games early in season, but I don't think he's had 2 starts in a row since The Incident. I'd have him over Albrighton right now, even if wing is not his natural role. He's got a good delivery and I think he could combine well with Ireland & N'Zogbia given a bit of time together. Would definitely improve our threat from set-pieces also.

Sadly it's probably just down to a few people believing those twitter rumours and placing bets..That's all it really takes (e.g. think how many different favourites we had to be new manager after Houllier left).

One of those games was Wigan, who have the worst attack in the league. And Blackburn weren't much cop either. Nullify Yakubu and they have very little.

This is the bit where it still makes no sense, 'cause McLeish was neither the cheapest nor the safest reasonable option. If it was pure cost-cutting and just trying to find a manager to tide us over until a sale, then there were free agents like McClaren and Curbishley who would have surely made more sense. Would have needed no compensation and they would have jumped at the job, whatever wages or long-term prospects were. Even though it defies belief, I think the most logical reasoning is that Lerner/Faulkner genuinely thought they were making a good choice with McLeish and intended it to be long-term. It doesn't make financial sense otherwise.

Removing him now would make some sense because we've got two very winnable home games coming up - calculation could be that removing McLeish would lift mood of players and fans, leading us to get a win or two and guarantee safety. Whereas if he stays and we don't win at least one of them, we're then into a horrible run of fixtures and it'll be hard to see where next win is coming from. Unfortunately the rumours sound paper-thin. Someone's wishful thinking magnified by the twitter echo chamber.

He's such a negative manager, he expresses his management philosophy in double negatives. I wonder if he also doesn't tell them not to not keep a clean sheet.. No wonder they look like they don't have a clue what they're doing. It can't be easy having to second guess what the manager has not told them to not do and infer from that what he actually wants them to do.

Yep Bolton match moved as they still in FA Cup. Not a very nice time for a replacement to come in though - first 5 fixtures would be Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Stoke, Man Utd!

The next 2 weeks will decide whether or not we're in the mix for relegation. If we lose at Blackburn, they will be 5 pts behind and will start to see us as a catchable target. QPR, Wigan and Wolves all have potentially winnable games that weekend too. Then the following weekend, the Bolton v QPR and Wolves v Blackburn fixtures guarantee that teams below us will pick up points. If we haven't beaten Blackburn, there will be huge pressure to get a win vs Fulham before we have a 2 week gap and the start of our nasty run-in. Basically, less than 3 points from the next two and I think we will definitely be in a relegation battle.

Does this help (start at 1992/193 season): Aston Villa 74/57/48/63/61/57/55/58/54/50/45/56/47/42/50/60/62/64/48 Cheers, thats useful data Please remember that the first 3 seasons were based on points total after a 42 game season when there were 22 clubs in the division. By my reckoning that gives us Points per game as follows: 1.76 1.36 1.14 1.66 1.61 1.50 1.45 1.53 1.42 1.32 1.18 1.47 1.24 1.11 1.32 1.58 1.63 1.68 1.26 This season we stand at 1.12 after 25 games. Which is worse than all seasons bar one (I think that is DOL's last season). Obviously he has a chance to improve on that, or indeed set a new low..

Nope. I see no hope of progress with McLeish in charge. The board should apologise to the fans for inflicting this season on us. As it's not a good time to be hiring, I'd rather just have Kevin MacDonald managing for the remainder of the season and see how he does - I think at the least he would lift morale of the players & the fans would be more willing to get behind the team, which should be enough to see us safe. Then either keep him on, if successful, or find a proper replacement in the summer.

He didn't get half the job right. If the plan was to win 1-0 like Everton and Sunderland, half the job is to keep a clean sheet, the other half is to score on the break. We did neither.

I think we have a team that is capable of going on a long run of games without winning, so we could certainly get sucked in. And the teams that get sucked in late in the season are often the ones that end up going down (as McLeish knows all too well) because they have the downward momentum. 10 points will likely see us safe and we should get that in 13 matches, but we're averaging little over 1 point per game so far, so it only takes a slight decline in form for us to be struggling to get 10 points.. Furthermore, I'm not convinced we have players who will have the right attitude to escape should we be drawn into the battle. Body language already looks pretty low - esp in home games - and should we have a couple of defeats to teams below us, it would be really damaging to morale.

Post-match interview said everything about McLeish's attitude. He doesn't seek to cause damage to the opposition, merely to minimize the damage they do to us. To only lose 1-0 is seen by him as a successful result because he sees it as a result that isn't bad enough for people to get on his back too much. It's really disappointing that he constantly blames luck for us conceding/not scoring - it's precisely the opposite of luck, it's exactly what you expect from the way the game was contested. They had most of the possession in our half of the pitch and won the vast majority of the set pieces, so a goal against was always likely. We had very little attacking possession and created almost nothing, so a goal for us was always unlikely. There was no luck involved in either our 0 or their 1. If anything, we were lucky to only concede 1. If Aguero had his shooting boots on, it might've been a heavier defeat. At this point, I think it would be better for long-term of the club if the run-in is bad enough that the owners are forced to sack McLeish, because I've yet to see anything that convinces me that he will take us anywhere positive in the future. We need a new manager who would bring back optimism to the fans - and this summer there should be more opportunity with funds to change things around, I do accept that McLeish's hands were somewhat tied by the wagebill. Heskey's wages alone should easily cover wages for 2 or 3 positive signings - find some players who are keen to prove themselves at top level, stop limiting ourselves to 'proven' (read: overpaid & complacent) Premier League stalwarts - same goes for managers. Please no more mediocrities who are 'proven' by finishing midtable elsewhere (i.e. NOT Bruce/Curbishley) but someone with some fresh ideas who has the drive to prove themselves in the Premier League with Villa.