So thats about the best part of £30million on poor to average players... Nothing to worry about then!..
£25 Million out of £130 Million gross spend isn't that bad.
It's all about opinions, for example, I know some people don't like Reo-Coker or Davies. I do. Its more closer to £50 million when they have been paid, theres not many owners of companys that want to see that on the year ending figures mate...
£50 Million? before having a pop, I'm guessing your counting Davies, Delph...who no they are good players but potentially very, very good.
Heskey - £3.5 Million
Sidwell - £5 Million
Beye - £2.5 Million.
Harewood - £4 Million
Knight - £3.5 Million
Maloney - £1 Million
Shorey - £4 Million.
Scott Carson - Loan
Wayne Routledge - £1 Million
Salifou - £0?
Agathe - £0?
Sutton - £0?
That's £24.5 Million.
We also have made £7 Million back from these transfers and most likely, Harewood, Shorey, Beye will also be gone. Possibly Heskey and Sidwell. Not including delph or davies, that lot above is closer to £30 million in fees and around another £20million in wages, hence £50million down the drain!.. by the way carson cost us a £2million loan fee...
Who counts wages?
If we were counting wages, United, Chelsea especially would have the biggest flops ever bought, Man City would be high on the list too.
When you start adding Wages to the list, it just becomes a desperate arguement. He's wasted money but no more than any other managers in the Premiership who would have managed for 4 years when having to buy the number of players he's had to buy. Oh right so they work for free then, Look however way you wanna dress it up pal, £50million has been spunked!..