joetipton86

.

says the bloke who got confused between Zlatan an Zidane

hes back on track hahahahaha

who an where are people talking about this?

Delphs been our best player up until his recent virus, the only player who can actually take a player on using skill..

Guzan could learn so much from these keepers, i dont know for certain but i would imagine that gk training in the us wouldnt focus so much on passing as a gk, but i am sure they were a lot further behind in coaching "soccer" when brad Was coming through as a young keeper..

I prefer lloris' as a gk, he can play football which i think is vital in a gk now, his passing and the way he sweeps are second to none

Hers some other points lloris aint better than manuel neur

Yes top 10 for sure, needs to work in his distribution to compete with lloris, de gea and hart, something your taught from an early age as a gk is when u get it dont give it straight back... Im sure newcastle fans would say krul is 1 of the best gks in league but doubt villa fams would agree

correct, but all im saying is hart would get a bigger offer, regardless of what club

Or did u think when liverpool signed carrol " they should of brought that benteke lad from genk they could of got him for £7mil"

I've read that three times and it still doesn't make sense. I think you are trying to say that Joe Hart is worth more in the transfer market... and therefore he must be better? yes thats the point im making... The same reason a bentleys worth more than a kia in price Or Andy Carroll was worth five times as much as Benteke? at the time he was what had he done scored a few in the belgian league? Obviously not now but back then he was. You could go on all day but your missing my point, im saying if these 2 went on market now , hart would go for more, theres a gk playing somewere that will be worth twice the amount of hart in 5 years but as yet been found.

obviously... I can see your point but if someones valued more they are clearer better.

How can you say that its like me reacting back with tonev 2 mill ronaldo 80 mill thats also logic.

I've read that three times and it still doesn't make sense. I think you are trying to say that Joe Hart is worth more in the transfer market... and therefore he must be better? yes thats the point im making... The same reason a bentleys worth more than a kia in price

if the scouts are as good as vandaq then surely they will come in for guzan

An no it doesnt matter but it proves the point im making is correct unless you have more knowledge than the clubs who would come in for hart over guzan or who would offer more money. Proves im right u fukin dick

That aint the point im making im just saying hart is better, im villa through n through but i was just making a point

Hart is 26 hes know where near his peak he is still learning, and to be honest i couldnt give a **** about him but my point was guzan is not in top 5 gk in pl ask any other fan of a different club an i get bet guzan doesnt get a mention.

o shit uv rumbled me its the head an shoulders adverts that get me.... Na mate i obviously know the game a lot more than you.

Im talking about his distribution with the ball, if hart went up for sale now an so did guzan, hart would attract bigger interest an man city would receive bigger offers and if you dont agree with that your a retard.

elaborate...

good call but he desperately needs a goal.

guzan is very poor at coming off his line an the amount of times he gives the ball away by kicking it out for a throw in is unreal, hes a fantastic shot stopper but his all round game is no where near as good as harts, i wish i could agree with you u i really do, but he could of easily lost us the game saturday when he was hesitant coming off his line, clarke would of been blamed but it was guzans fault, luckily it was dealt with.

I think benteke is still in pain from norwich game tbh