No it isn't.
There's actually a fair bit of very accurate, if also very guarded, reporting in the article. Equally, some of it might not be 100%.
Crikey, that sounds v. on the fence, but hey....
You may think that Pete, but the title is very misleading and wildly speculative, going against all the little whispers I'm (we're) hearing. After that it tells us very little we didn't already know.
Sloppy journalism IMO, but it does help keep the pressure on, just incase I'm wrong........