chrissmith921

I'm still chuckling over this gem Even the Spurs fan in my office is laughing at it!

Its original because 96.5% of Spurs fans have been informed by in the know people that its original. FACT.

You seriously dont get it do you? Your team is shit, most people here despise your manager, despite what the evening standard might tell you, Spurs most certainly are not going to be breaking the top 4 any time soon. Enjoy your time on here, but I'm sure you'll soon **** off back to COYS or whatever forum Glastonspur has recruited you from and begin masterbating over 'in the know' posts made by people making up bullshit, and GlastonSpurs glorious statistics that he rolls out all the time. 12% improvement when King plays! Ha! ****.

In terms of 10 Liverpool have a rich history - you can understand where their fans are coming from on that. Newcastle are by far and away the biggest side in the North East of the country. Spurs, mediocre history and arent even the biggest club in their borough, let alone city and most certainly not their region. I can understand why Newcastle fans think they're huge (they have to go a long way to find people raving about other clubs - its Newcastle, Newcastle, Newcastle up there) - Spurs though?? **** sake - you want to see a massive club, look down the road.

Either way it got a good chomp out of you. Spurs are a massive club, you know

Almost as comical a statement as anything trying make Ledley King the best of his generation, eh?!!

Theres a difference between giving a bit of banter back, and complaining about people swearing and then turning and flicking the salute at a crowd of people. Plus, have I mentioned, he is a word removed. He'll probably try suing me for that though.

lets see who he tries tapping up via the papers over the next few weeks eh

because he is a word removed of the highest order

That is Soooooooooo last year, in fact its probably three years ago but being as you live in South Wales no doubt you'll be the height of sophistication and a real trend setter this year Too right. I got my millennium bug spray and everything.

he would most certainly. but then again, hes the best of his generation, don't you know. he can even be considered amongst those greats such as paul mcgrath - who, despite having crocked knees, actually played. most of the time pissed, but he still ruined anyone he faced. but yeah, sitting on the side, not playing, puts you in the same category....

:cool: glad thats been sorted. Now, good to see Ledley King has just picked up his world player of the year award.

mmm now that sounds like big time charlie attitude to me, what do you think Parky???? :winkold: How can it be big time charlie if its Spurs? For they are big time!!! Theyre not a small club imagining they're big!!!

Neon Blue is this years colour!

Real or fake? A man can always tell...

Ironic post of the week.

The whole 'King is great' argument applies to Phil King only. Woodgate is a better player than Ledley King, Spurs fans just massively over-rate King because he's stayed there his entire career - mainly because no other **** would pay him such huge wages to do **** all.

Who thinks King is playing well at the moment? Oh wait, hes not playing. It doesnt matter how good you think he is - fact is hes NEVER produced the goods because he is never fit.

Yes 10 times this has been won by a defender during Kings generation. King has won it once. Micah Richards has also won it once, you asked when did I last watch MOTD, 2007? Yet you point out King is better, but he's not won an award since 2004... so...? Since then by the way, we've seen such legends as Kevin Nolan, Andy Johnson (TWICE!) and Micah Richards (of course hes shit... ) win the award. But they're also the best of their generation too :cool: To be fair he did miss out the * after he said that. Which would have mentioned that he is the best Spurs central defender of his generation, not named Jonathon Woodgate. And Sol Campbell. Perhaps he means the best Spurs defender who's taken them for £40k a week to let him get pissed up, not train and most of the time not even play?!

Nothing to do with the fact he's a better player than those mentioned then? Seeing as they were all fit for the said fixtures. And playing well. Don't be silly. Lescott was having a 'torrid time' at Man City, apparently. Despite the fact they were having an incredible run with one of the leagues best defenses at said time, but we won't mention that. Oh, dont be silly, he was having a torrid time. The same way Lennon has been 'causing panic and mayhem' throughout the Premier League. :cool:

Yes 10 times this has been won by a defender during Kings generation. King has won it once. Micah Richards has also won it once, you asked when did I last watch MOTD, 2007? Yet you point out King is better, but he's not won an award since 2004... so...? Since then by the way, we've seen such legends as Kevin Nolan, Andy Johnson (TWICE!) and Micah Richards (of course hes shit... ) win the award. But they're also the best of their generation too :cool:

Because Capello rates him as the best fit alternative? I nwould have thought that was obvious. I don't think you can understand English. There was a squad of 6 centre backs picked, got it? John Terry, Rio Ferdinand, Matthew Upson, Phil Jagielka, Joleon Lescott and Ledley King. That much we agree on? You said the only reason Upson was called up was due to King being injured, correct? Surely this suggests that he is rated less than the other 5 by Capello, as he was only called up due to Kings absence (which is a false claim, Upson was named in the orignal squad, but I'll humour you). So why is it, that seeing as you think that Capello feels Upson is rated lower than these, that he is STARTING games? Lescott and Jagielka had been fit, yet Upson was still starting. Your lack of logic is fightening. Not at all, I think the fact that Jagielka is long term injured, Lescott is having a torrid time at city and Upson is looking fairly comfortable and assured is why he is now Capellos first pick. Nothing to do with the fact he's a better player than those mentioned then? Seeing as they were all fit for the said fixtures. And playing well.

Has King ever won player of the month then?

So why did he keep injured players in there, yet send King home? Keep 'knocking them down' if thats how you believe Point out one TRUE FACT that paints McGrath as equal, or inferior, a player to King. Please. Not your opinion, or what theyve done to Spurs' results - but as an individual player, post a fact. Here's the mcgrath fact - voted PFA Player of the Year as a centre half for a non title winning side. The first EVER centre half to win the award. Now, what can you say about King?

If the Spurs fan comes back with 'he was left out because he was injured' - can we laugh him out of here like an Irish appeal at a FIFA meeting?