I was one of the 3 to vote undecided.
I think MON has done great for now, and it'd be wholly illogical for him to go at the moment, he has built a good squad, a good first team, and we are doing pretty well under his charge.
But I just think his flaws will prove to be a problem when we want to challenge the likes of Man U and Arsenal year in year out and also the likes of Barcelona, AC Milan, given that our goal is to get back into the Champions League.
MON's major flaw has been his tactical acumen during the game itself, and his unwillingness to use his substitutes.
I understand MON is very loyal to his first-team players who are playing well, and doesn't like to take them off and change things during games in which we are winning. But sadly, this loyalty to his players has cost us, especially in the Man City game, when after 10 or so minutes of sustained Man City pressure through the influence of Ireland, MON still didn't do anything to combat that. He doesn't seem to respond to the changes in the opposition side's approach, be it through substitution and/or approach play. He only reacted in the Man City game AFTER they equalized by sending on Heskey for Carew, and it was too little too late. Damage had already been done.
And the Man City example is just that - an example. MON has been guilty of this unwillingness to respond tactically many other times, and I'm sure many other posters will recall serperate occasions where this has happened.
I'm willing to stick with MON for now, I really do think he can take us even higher than where we are now, but when we do get up there with the big boys, will MON be good enough for us?