Spot on.
West Ham- DRAW
Arsenal- DRAW
Manure- DRAW
Wolves- DRAW
Sunderland- DRAW
West Ham- WIN
Arsenal- LOSE
Manure- LOSE
Wolves- WIN
Sunderland- WIN
The bottom sequence gains you four more points over a season. We're back to what we were under Gregory, content to draw half our games during a season as it looks good to see we have a ten or so game unbeaten run, it ultimately gets you nowhere if you don't win enough games.
West Ham- LOSE
Arsenal- LOSE
Manure- LOSE
Wolves- LOSE
Sunderland- LOSE, and half the team die in a flesh-eating virus outbreak
West Ham- DRAW
Arsenal- DRAW
Manure- DRAW
Wolves- DRAW
Sunderland- DRAW
The bottom sequence is better than the top.
Or, to put it another way, it's better to win than draw, and it's better to draw than lose.
In other news, the Pope is a big beleiver in transubstantiation, and Gentle Ben is no stranger to a poo in the pines.
In all seriousness though, beating West Ham, Wolves and Sunderland, and losing to Man U and Arsenal would just have people being merely satisfied that we're winning against 'lesser' opposition, and kicking off that we can't compete with the elite.
The reality is we have proved this season that we can compete with the elite. We've been in a cup final, and at least a cup semi final. We've put top four sides to the sword. We have also, disappointingly, not done enough against mediocre opposition on occasion. Until recently, the latter lows were the norm, but the former highs weren't. That (and the obvious chairmen difference) is why it's not like how it was under Gregory, and why I'm happy to be a Villan.