Jump to content

villanmac

Established Member
  • Posts

    1,281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by villanmac

  1. Tonight was the third time he has needed treatment for a bloodied face and on each occasion the foul was given against him. The other two were:

    Brentford last season

    Chelsea this season 

    Incredible.

    • Like 1
    • Shocked 1
  2. 3 hours ago, sne said:

    West Ham-Frieburg in the Europa League is a pretty big fixture when it comes to UEFA nation ranking. Guess we have to root for the ham rather than the burg.

    Im just happy they are in it so they are in same boat with the Thursday games when we play them.

    • Like 1
  3. Pau would be a breath of fresh air to the team. Particularly the midfield and the full backs. Just the change in impetus it will give would give would automatically raise the game of the midfield and the fullbacks. The stuff that Kamara and Luiz did for Watkins goal v Sheffield United is what we are missing against the better teams.

    • Like 1
  4. 38 minutes ago, wishywashy said:

    I don't really get the new trademark: it doesn't solve any of the many issues going on with the first iteration, bar the comically poor drop shadow (which they didn't have to replace the lion to fix?). And now with the new lion, putting this badge digitally at a smaller size... judge for yourself. The contrast and colouring is horrific: the last one is somehow better on this regard, imo!

    image.png.5f9af8e40bcaa3869f167dae03849b72.png

    I hope that the trademark's to cover the physical, more detailed lion that'll probably be on the kits (and I don't get why they'd need to do that at all) as opposed to the actual design that'll also be digital, because.. eep.

    It stands out to me.

    The other badges look absolutely shite.

    The villa one is Simple, clean, classic and more id say looks classier than of the others ones.

    I dont buy the shirts, but if they werent football club badges and i had to choose one to wear as a logo on a shirt it would be the villa one.

    • Like 1
  5.  

    9 hours ago, STO said:

    I am a bit surprised that a Luton, Burnley or Sheffield United haven't taken a gamble on Chambers.  He would do a decent job for one of them. 

    He's not good enough for them. He can't run or defend, is not strong enough to play CB..what decent job is he going to do?

    I can still see that Arsenal branding is working for him. Was greeted pretty universally as a clever buy,  shrewd in fact, by villa fans at the time.

    He's always been shit got Arsenal on this CV so automatically rated him. In the same bucket as "played for Arsenal make them England Internationals" Jenkinson, Maitlend Niles and Kieron **** Gibbs.

    One of Gerrard's "INtERnaTIOnaL and EuROpeAn ExPeRIEnce" signings.

    • Like 2
  6. He's not that kinda player to be standing out hete. He's strengths are more intelligence and link up rather rather then any outstanding skill or explosiveness. Hes not single handedly take it to Chelsea up front on his own.

    His movement off the ball does look good, I think it's his footballing iq more than anything that emery has seen and of course at 6ft 3 or whatever he's is he's got enough about him physically to be a prem player.

    • Like 1
  7. They owe us for giving them 35 mills worth of talent last season and Finn Azaz for 50p.
    Plus he came through the baggies youth system so he basically belongs to us.

    Hand him over Smoggies.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...
Â