Jump to content

blunther

Established Member
  • Posts

    1,499
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by blunther

  1. Nobody hates you Julie, at least I don't. I just think your views are exceedingly strange and based on ignorance and lies, and that your religion is an evil, twisted, malignant cancer on the world.

    How can you say that without hating the person/people who adhere to that religion and actively try and get other people involved?

    Hate the sin, love the sinner...?

  2. They should be able to fine people for parking like a clearing in the woods.

    I think they can, can't they?

    Both public and private car parks can charge for parking that breaches the white lines, I think, if they want to.

    Private car parks can invoice you, usually through parking companies like UKPC, Town and City Parking, and their ilk, but you don't have to pay it if you don't want to. If you fancy being a word removed, you can go and stick your car across two disabled bays each time you go to the supermarket and they can't really do shit about it.

  3. I don't get it. So they'll be able to loan the stadium at £2m p.a., despite running costs of £5m p.a. - also £50m of public money is being used to convert it from 80,000 to a 60,000 venue. What's more, apparently Boris offered Tottenham some money to develop WHL if they dropped their appeal...?!

    How is all this public money going into private football clubs? Maybe we should get Brum Council to buy us Tevez?

  4. Why not only allow certain cars to use the fast lane? As a policeman told me when he pulled me over for speeding, my car at the time was built to go fast and had the necessary braking systems etc, a Citroen Saxo was not.

    Not sure if anyone's replied to this in the subsequent four pages, but it does my nut in . The reason is, because it's not a frigging 'fast lane'. There isn't a fast lane or a slow lane. There's a lane for driving in, an overtaking lane, and a second overtaking lane. If chappy is doing 50mph in lane one, and chappette is doing 60mph in lane 2, overtaking, then chapsmash is perfectly entitled to overtake at 65mph in lane 3.

    Good points blunther. How many people actually follow that rule though? I see cock ends - albeit typically in Audi's and BMW's (but that is another conversation :-) ) stuck in the "fast lane" of the motorway as some god given right in their opinion. The rules that you pass your test on say that you should return to the left hand lane , but the reality is that many don't.

    Indeed, and that's what needs sorting out if we want the motorways to go faster. Can't see this making any real practical difference at all. more police on the roads pulling over middle lane hogs and sending them on courses like they have for speeding (or just shooting them - fine with that too) seems to make more sense. But then a camera can't pull someone over, so unlikely to happen.

  5. Why not only allow certain cars to use the fast lane? As a policeman told me when he pulled me over for speeding, my car at the time was built to go fast and had the necessary braking systems etc, a Citroen Saxo was not.

    Not sure if anyone's replied to this in the subsequent four pages, but it does my nut in . The reason is, because it's not a frigging 'fast lane'. There isn't a fast lane or a slow lane. There's a lane for driving in, an overtaking lane, and a second overtaking lane. If chappy is doing 50mph in lane one, and chappette is doing 60mph in lane 2, overtaking, then chapsmash is perfectly entitled to overtake at 65mph in lane 3.

  6. So it wasn't the General posting on Facebook.... it was what he wrote on Vital that was copied by someone else onto Facebook...?

    Anyone got a link to the Vital comments?

    If so then I'll shut up and start worrying along with the rest of ya :D

×
×
  • Create New...
Â