Jump to content

Stockport_Villain

Established Member
  • Posts

    801
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Stockport_Villain

  1. I like him but thought on a couple of occasions he didn't track back and left their right sided players with a couple of chances. Hopefully this is due to fitness which will resolve itself.

  2. He knows what he is doing, has a clear plan of how he wants the team to play, what type of players he wants in that team and has a decent support team with him. Yes it will be a learning experience but I think we will safely stay up, learn from the experience and improve again next year. Enjoy the ride.

    • Like 1
  3. 18 minutes ago, dont_do_it_doug. said:

    I didn't change the scope. 

    You said it was a con that you could only buy one ticket per reference. I asked you why, you said because it creates 'privilege'. I replied saying that I would cap the number of claret memberships at 3,000, but to allow them to buy more than one ticket achieves the opposite of what you want, it allows even less fans who can't afford the start up fee of a season ticket or claret membership to go to games. Thus your idea = privilege.

    At that point you got snarky so I replied in kind. I'm not belittling you, please don't gaslight. 

    If you’d bothered to read my original post you’d have seen that I don’t agree with the membership scheme at all. But instead you picked up on a response I replied to someone asking me a question taking it out of context to suit your own agenda. The con part of my response was about the membership not the one ticket per reference.

    Im sure anyone who’s part responses are used out of context to try and make a point might feel aggrieved. As for gaslight, I’ve no idea what you’re talking about.

  4. 1 hour ago, dont_do_it_doug. said:

    And your logic fell apart under scrutiny. No problem. 

    Get real on you point scoring. You asked a question I replied,  you tried to change the scope, I declined, you feel the need to belittle. Sad

  5. 12 minutes ago, dont_do_it_doug. said:

    If you want to talk about how the entire economic system is a con I'm here for it, but I don't think the '1 member = 1 ticket' rule is emblematic of it. 

    I personally think they should have capped Claret Membership at 3,000 or something. But allowing those members to then buy more than one ticket only exasperates the issue. 

    Not particularly as you asked me about the Claret Membership to which I replied. Thanks

  6. 3 hours ago, dont_do_it_doug. said:

    In what way is that a con?

    To create a tiered system for those that can afford it  for the privilege of trying to get a ticket at the expense of those that can’t afford it. We should all be able to buy tickets based on our attendance not because we can afford to join an elite at the expense of others.

×
×
  • Create New...
Â