Jump to content

sir_gary_cahill

Established Member
  • Posts

    12,228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sir_gary_cahill

  1. fletcher would cost a lot more than 3-4m, burnley paid 3m for him
  2. He's not listed on thefa.com, I'm sure he's played for Ireland
  3. Umit Eminoglu played for Turkey u16 last week Jack Grealish and Jordan Graham are in the Ireland u15 squad for next week's tri nation tournament
  4. Firstly, he is very quick, maybe not as quick as Gabby but he has a footballing brain which cannot be taught or developed, he's just born to play football, his movement is outstanding, his first touch is breathtaking, he can do things that no other player can do with a football, Paul Merson said when he was 14 that he will be the best striker in the world and I agree with him. Gotta quote? nope
  5. 2009/10 was the first season that Rooney has got over 20 league and you say he's the best striker in the world and yet you say Delfouneso will be a 20 league goal striker but not world class, how does that work? Because Rooney's game is so much more than that. His movement, touch, brain, work ethic, creativity was always up there with the best in the world. The only thing stopping Rooney from becoming the very best was the lack of goals, he's always been world class in every department apart from goals and now he's added that to his list therefore the total package. Delfouneso will be more of a Bent type player. Very good goalscorer but never world class. A world class striker, in your opinion who scores 10-15 goals per season or Darren Bent who's guaranteed to score 20-25, I know which 1 I'd take
  6. 2009/10 was the first season that Rooney has got over 20 league and you say he's the best striker in the world and yet you say Delfouneso will be a 20 league goal striker but not world class, how does that work?
  7. Firstly, he is very quick, maybe not as quick as Gabby but he has a footballing brain which cannot be taught or developed, he's just born to play football, his movement is outstanding, his first touch is breathtaking, he can do things that no other player can do with a football, Paul Merson said when he was 14 that he will be the best striker in the world and I agree with him.
  8. if the manager picked Delfouneso he would've got at least 17 goals imo he just needs a chance, I don't have the answers, I have no idea why the manager won't start him, he's ready I've watched him since he was 15, I know how good he is and how good he can be, I said it the 1st time I saw him and I still believe it now, he will be the best in the world bar none, forget your Rooneys, Villas etc I'll donate £10000 to VT if Delfouneso is ever voted as the worlds best player. I meant best striker
  9. if the manager picked Delfouneso he would've got at least 17 goals imo he just needs a chance, I don't have the answers, I have no idea why the manager won't start him, he's ready I've watched him since he was 15, I know how good he is and how good he can be, I said it the 1st time I saw him and I still believe it now, he will be the best in the world bar none, forget your Rooneys, Villas etc
  10. why can't he be? you've said on many occasions that Agbonlahor is 1 of the best strikers in the league, Delfouneso is streets ahead of Agbonlahor at the same age IN YOUR OPINION Blimey, if Delf is so much better than Gabby then why is Gabby our first choice striker? am I the manager??
  11. why can't he be? you've said on many occasions that Agbonlahor is 1 of the best strikers in the league, Delfouneso is streets ahead of Agbonlahor at the same age
  12. ok then so you'd rather risk losing the best young striker in the country? What we pay him now makes no difference to whether he stays or goes. If he's attracting attention in 2 years we'll offer him the money then. Paying it him now when no-one's particularly interested is madness. if he leaves in 2 years and his reason is "Villa didn't pay me £50k a week for the past 2 years" then he can **** off anyway. Well I've seen reports recently saying that Everton will offer Jack Rodwell 50k per week and he's the same age as Delfouneso and a lot less potential imo, it's called looking after your best assets or risk losing them It's actually reported in the mirror (best actual link, so hardly concrete) that it's £25,000 a week, and he also has played 47 games for Everton and 11 for England under 21's, so Delfouneso is less experienced than Rodwell. apologies, I thought it was 50k, I never said he didn't have more experience, I said Delfouneso has more potential which he does No, he really doesn't. Jack Rodwell can play in central defence, at full back, in a holiding role, in central midfield, in the hole and probably up top too, he can tackle, pass, score goals, win the ball in the air and hasn't looked out of place once since making his name. He's also scored big goals in big games. Jack Rodwell has all the attributes. please enlighten me when has he played full back?? never played in the hole either and certainly not up front imo Delfouneso could play up front for Barcelona in a few years, does Rodwell have the potential to play for them? not in my opinion
  13. rated higher because he's had more exposure and been thrown in at the deep end at Everton because their manager knows how to handle young talent
  14. ok then so you'd rather risk losing the best young striker in the country? What we pay him now makes no difference to whether he stays or goes. If he's attracting attention in 2 years we'll offer him the money then. Paying it him now when no-one's particularly interested is madness. if he leaves in 2 years and his reason is "Villa didn't pay me £50k a week for the past 2 years" then he can **** off anyway. Well I've seen reports recently saying that Everton will offer Jack Rodwell 50k per week and he's the same age as Delfouneso and a lot less potential imo, it's called looking after your best assets or risk losing them It's actually reported in the mirror (best actual link, so hardly concrete) that it's £25,000 a week, and he also has played 47 games for Everton and 11 for England under 21's, so Delfouneso is less experienced than Rodwell. apologies, I thought it was 50k, I never said he didn't have more experience, I said Delfouneso has more potential which he does
  15. ok then so you'd rather risk losing the best young striker in the country? I thought that was Sturridge :winkold: Delfouneso is slightly better
  16. ok then so you'd rather risk losing the best young striker in the country? What we pay him now makes no difference to whether he stays or goes. If he's attracting attention in 2 years we'll offer him the money then. Paying it him now when no-one's particularly interested is madness. if he leaves in 2 years and his reason is "Villa didn't pay me £50k a week for the past 2 years" then he can **** off anyway. Well I've seen reports recently saying that Everton will offer Jack Rodwell 50k per week and he's the same age as Delfouneso and a lot less potential imo, it's called looking after your best assets or risk losing them
  17. ok then so you'd rather risk losing the best young striker in the country?
  18. I'd argue against that. A.Young Agbonlahor Carew Outside of that I can't think of anyone else that would be on circa 50K, unless when you say circa you mean anything within 25k.... no I meant around 45k-60k , I'd put my life on Dunne, Petrov and Heskey being on those wages
  19. How much do you think Delph is on? around 25k but is he in the 1st XI?? No, I'm referring to you saying we should have offered Sturridge 50k which is unrealistic, 25k is a more realistic wage. players dictate wages these days, we should be prepared to push the boat out for certain players Not exactly. If a player wants 50k and financially we can only offer 25k he can't come. If Sturridge came on 50k, and Delph was on 25k, he'd want that amount. Same for the likes of Collins, Agbonlahor etc. We're not Man City. Infact they wouldn't even offer Sturridge the wages he wants and that says a lot... you have to break your wage structure from time to time in order to improve it's as simple as that really, if you're happy with 6th every season then yeah fine keep paying new signings 25k per week We do pay big wages if a player is deserved. Daniel Sturridge has done nothing more than Delfouneso in his football career. Do you honestly believe Delfouneso deserves £50,000 a week from Aston Villa? might aswell give it to him now because we will have to in a year or 2 when the vultures start circling
  20. How much do you think Delph is on? around 25k but is he in the 1st XI?? No, I'm referring to you saying we should have offered Sturridge 50k which is unrealistic, 25k is a more realistic wage. players dictate wages these days, we should be prepared to push the boat out for certain players Not exactly. If a player wants 50k and financially we can only offer 25k he can't come. If Sturridge came on 50k, and Delph was on 25k, he'd want that amount. Same for the likes of Collins, Agbonlahor etc. We're not Man City. Infact they wouldn't even offer Sturridge the wages he wants and that says a lot... you have to break your wage structure from time to time in order to improve it's as simple as that really, if you're happy with 6th every season then yeah fine keep paying new signings 25k per week
  21. How much do you think Delph is on? around 25k but is he in the 1st XI?? No, I'm referring to you saying we should have offered Sturridge 50k which is unrealistic, 25k is a more realistic wage. players dictate wages these days, we should be prepared to push the boat out for certain players
  22. How much do you think Delph is on? around 25k but is he in the 1st XI??
  23. I agree completely, we should've got him 1st time around and given 50k per week but as usual we were too slow in the transfer market Why would we give a 19 or 20 year old 50k? Ridiculous wage demands. you have to pay top dollar to the best young talent Yes, the best young talent that have actually proven themselves. Anyway most of the suggestions in this thread seem to be influenced by past transfer deals, all very realistic and a bit uninspiring. We need something different and MON has mentioned it I beleive. he would have if he had stayed fit, he showed fantastic potential at Man City at times and we should've gone for him....end of
  24. I'd hazard a guess that the majority of our 1st XI is on circa 50 k
×
×
  • Create New...
Â