Denis_B
-
Posts
1,652 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Downloads
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Store
Events
Everything posted by Denis_B
-
The problem is imagine Dougs satisfaction of turning down Royalty!
-
All this and not a word about Still..... I wodner why? Ellis leaks to Baggy Bill, we know Ellis speaks to Murphy. I am beginning to think that Still and Co have very quietly stolen a lead on the rest and Lerner will only come over IF Stills mob are out of it. Smoke and Mirros indeed
-
I am sure Doug/Randy/Rothchilds/Mon all confide in our little scouse friend
-
Same as we already know
-
We need to keep it all together, it's a bloody nightmare trying to keep track otherwise.
-
They can't deny it as the club want O'Neill. And they can't confirm it as he hasn't signed a contract and I bet he's really impressed that Doug told Boggy Bill the story he printed today. He managed to feck up Lerner last week and he's trying to do the same woth MON. I just wish someone at B6 would try and exercise some control over him.
-
That is probably a good assumption. If RL buys Dougs shares and Petcheys shares he immediately has over 50% holding and can basically do what he likes. That could happen very very quickly....emphasis on COULD
-
There is a lot of 'lazy journalism' going on here. I suggest that there are some posters on here that know a clearer picture than any national journo who makes up half what is written.
-
Which is exactly why the announcement was made on the OS today. Doug fecked up big style and they are trying to reassure interested parties that it won't happen again. They might just as well have said so!
-
That sums it up BUT IF Doug recommends the bid and Petchey does it is a done deal because they hold between them the majority shareholding. At that point there would be nothing to stop a manager being appointed to get on with the job. Pure fantasy though as Doug will never recommend a bid.... it needs Petchey to slap the old duffer around the head with a lettuce!"
-
No, trading is still open as we are still just in 'bid situation' as we have been for some 11 months
-
...... and we haven't got a dodgy Russian keen to buy us (allegedly and all that)
-
...and I don't see any reason whatsoever for AV PLC to make any comment along thelines they have today under stock market rules. They are already in a declared bid situation and this is clearly just another attempt to fend off questions a few days before the annual accounts are due out.
-
So what that mewans is folks 'I Doug Ellis will not make any comment about anything due to stick exchange rules, no go away little people andlet me finish my holiday in peace'
-
So you're not a real old fart then?
-
No he's too old
-
Ballbags tit head
-
Mark, having spoken to Mike about this at length I honestly believe it is in ALL of our interests to say as little as possible at this stage. There will be plenty of time to talk and digest later. This is not a matter of people knowing something and being 'clever' by keeping it to themselves and hinting at things I believe there is something big possible and no way would I or really should I or anyone else do or say anything to jeopardise things.
-
The world is but a stage and we are all actors on it!
-
The quesion to the Honourable member from Cymru is 'Are these real bids, talks of bids, possible enquiries about making a bid or most likely figments of Dougs own dementia to prevent asking questions at the AGM sort of bids?'
-
Here's one for the Malc knockers to refer to at a later date the share price is likely to rise in the very near future on the back of two new bids. OK Malc..... no knockers for a week ...... no not Robs sort
-
Anda bit less than Ransonwas prepared to pay.... thanks Doug!
-
So can one of you bean counters explain to me the following.....as far as we know no bid has been made. We are not currently going through 'due dilligence', Comers seem out of it so why are we still classed as being in a 'bid situation' by the LSE?.
-
Petchey could instigate yet another rumour of a takeover, the share price shoots up and he then sells to the first opportunist to ask. The protection Ellis has at the moment is that in a 'bid situation' anyone buying more than 1% of shares has to identify themselves and their intentions.
-
It probably means he is less likely to find a bidder willing to pay what we believe to be his inflated asking price