Jump to content

Bunnski

Established Member
  • Posts

    3,973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Bunnski

  1. How many defensive cockups has Clark done as compared to Baker?

    Baker has had a few bad ones himself, only seem to get half the stick though.

    clark has more experience than baker. this is bakers first year getting a decent run and he has definitely improved.

  2. chelsea play us the week before the uefa cup final so heres hoping they beat basle and have their eyes on that final when they play us.

    wigan have been playing well and not getting results. their luck will change soon if they keep playing like that. its all on us to put the points on the board and not give them a chance

  3. o

    clark has shown no progression if anything hes gone backwards. his distrbution is terrible. 9 times out of 10 the ball ends up back with the other team. baker looks like he can make it but for me clark doesnt.

    Passing accuracy better than Baker's.

    http://www.whoscored.com/Teams/24

    still a worse defenfer than baker. i never claimed baker had better distribution than clark

  4. Never had a chance the way we were set-up tonight

    we actually had a very good chance just before they scored the 2nd goal but your right we should of tried to sit back and defend all night

    Lambert must be dumb as shit to think we have a team that can go to Old Trafford and go toe-to-toe with them. Every side but 2 or 3 in the league goes there with an extra man in the middle of midfield. Saying I wanted to defend all night is bollocks, a front 3 of Gabby, Weimann and Benteke will create chances against any side, we would still have seven other outfield players who can concentrate on keeping it tight in midfield and at the back.

    fair enough. I agree that an extra body in midfield would of helped especially instead of insomnia. if we didnt concede so early then we could of maybe got the lead and hit them on the counter which imo was our best chance of getting something tonight. the early goal killed our gameplan

  5. clark has shown no progression if anything hes gone backwards. his distrbution is terrible. 9 times out of 10 the ball ends up back with the other team. baker looks like he can make it but for me clark doesnt.

  6. Never had a chance the way we were set-up tonight

    we actually had a very good chance just before they scored the 2nd goal but your right we should of tried to sit back and defend all night

  7. Benteke again AWOL v a big club. It's not gone unnoticed

    what?  he played ok. should of scored and in general held the ball up well and played decent enough passes to keep our attacks alive.

     

    gabby should of been takin off in the 2nd half, he looked bolloxed and his touch was awful

  8.  

     

    You're right, it must be a conspiracy, not the officials just being human.

     

    The worst thing to happen to this sport is letting fans see slow motion and freeze frame footage of the game from a beneficial viewing angle. Try seeing this when running at ground level.

    who said anything about a conspiracy?   the goals were offside.  the worst thing thats happened to this sport is to leave decisions that involve inches in the hands of humans.  if hawk eye was on the job then we wouldnt of conceded any of them goals. 

     

     

     

    Well now you're talking sense, I agree with you that technology would help.

     

    But suggesting that the linesman is a united fan  is unfair in my view, it's a difficult job that can at times become pretty much impossible.

     

    well one things for sure. he isnt a villa fan...

  9. You're right, it must be a conspiracy, not the officials just being human.

     

    The worst thing to happen to this sport is letting fans see slow motion and freeze frame footage of the game from a beneficial viewing angle. Try seeing this when running at ground level.

    who said anything about a conspiracy?   the goals were offside.  the worst thing thats happened to this sport is to leave decisions that involve inches in the hands of humans.  if hawk eye was on the job then we wouldnt of conceded any of them goals. 

  10.  

     

     

     

     

    All THREE GOALS WERE OFFSIDE. IT IS INEXCUSABLE. 

     

    They were touch and go, you are never going to get 100% accuracy for that. The attacker is supposed to get the benefit of any doubt from the linesman.

     

    the attacker gets the benefit if its level not when its OFFSIDE!!   your ignoring the facts just to put lambert and the team down. well done, great support

     

     

     

    There were a couple of inches in it. No linesman in the world is going to be able to accurately call that.

     

    3 times in a row??  the linesman is either a utd supporter or hes incapable

     

     

     

    Oh wind your neck in. Someone clearings in the woods the ball 40 yards up the pitch and you think someone is able to to spot where 2 different players and the ball are to the nearest inch. Not a chance in hell.

     

    another linesman might have given them the other way, but ultimately when it's as close to that, they're guessing.

     

    are you a utd fan?  seriously, if its offside then its offside.  if it happens once then fair enough but 3 times?? wind your own neck in!

  11.  

     

     

    All THREE GOALS WERE OFFSIDE. IT IS INEXCUSABLE. 

     

    They were touch and go, you are never going to get 100% accuracy for that. The attacker is supposed to get the benefit of any doubt from the linesman.

     

    the attacker gets the benefit if its level not when its OFFSIDE!!   your ignoring the facts just to put lambert and the team down. well done, great support

     

     

     

    There were a couple of inches in it. No linesman in the world is going to be able to accurately call that.

     

    3 times in a row??  the linesman is either a utd supporter or hes incapable

×
×
  • Create New...
Â