Jump to content

lp_villa830

Established Member
  • Posts

    1,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lp_villa830

  1. 25 minutes ago, dn1982 said:

    I've no idea why he bothers putting 2 CB on the bench if he won't use them. It was the correct decision to move Jedinak there as bringing either of the other 2 on would've meant moving Chester but why have them on the bench though? Playing Hutton right mid is baffling. We aren't going up so why not try the kids out? Bringing on Elphick at 2 nil up to a team with 10 men was another strange decision. Positives from today are Hourihane looks the part and can play in a 2 but not much else. The football isn't good and needs to improve a lot. 

    Their is noone else to put on the bench anyway.

    • Like 2
  2. 9 minutes ago, jackdaww said:

    you are assuming baker is earmarked to mark jannson .

    i dont think thats the way it works.

    for their goal , hutton was on jansonn and failed to do enough to put him off.

    for the volley onto bar , no-one picked him up , quite correct but why should that be bakers job why not chester , hutton or jedinak/westwood ,

     

    Baker was definitely supposed to be marking jannson for the volley the replays show him marking him before the ball came in. He then completely lost him. 

    • Like 2
  3. 2 hours ago, darrenm said:

    I've just watched it again. Not only did he lose the challenge against Jansson, he also blocked off (literally put his arm out and pushed him off) Baker from getting there.

    Screenshot_20161229-223139-1920x1080.png

    Screenshot_20161229-222911-1920x1080.png

    Im not so sure he was Huttons man to mark i think everyone loses his man and Hutton just happens to end up closest.

     

    As the corner was coming in it looks to me like Baker is watching him but much to far away as a starting position. I could be wrong though. 

    20161230_013834.png

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, 1958Villan said:

    For one thing, Ciaran Clark was a holding/defensive midfielder, that is until O'Neil played him as cover at centre-back.

    That is why he hasn't got the basics of being a central defender in his armoury, although with decent specialist coaching he could make the transition, if he really wanted to. 

    He has always been a centre back throughout his time here in the youth team and first team. He got played at DM as we had no one else at the time to play there. 

    • Like 1
  5. 6 minutes ago, Genie said:

    I agree, I know it's a terrible cliche but all those shots that went straight at the keeper were hit 'too well', if one or 2 of them were scuffed or miss hit we'd potentially have won (like Wales winner).

    To me a lot of our shots had a hint of desperation to them. They just needed to be a bit more composed in some of the chances we had. But instead they just tried to put their foot threw the ball.

  6. 8 minutes ago, useless said:

    I quoted Stevo, because I felt his post was an example of someone worrying what other fans think when you said that that wasn't happening. Also you suggest that I was trolling and I was trying to achive something. So why not take some your own advice.

    I don't think think Steve cares, I think he was just making an observation.

    The hating football fans some times is just a throwaway line. I doubt he has gone to bed tonight fretting over what random people online think over England's performance. 

    • Like 1
  7. 33 minutes ago, Dante_Lockhart said:

    I'd want the money in full too. Non of this pissing about over 5 years like reported with the Tekkers purchase.

    It's very rare for any transfer to be paid in one full payment. That wasn't specific to Bentekes transfer.

    • Like 3
  8. 5 minutes ago, Stevo985 said:

    Anyway, decent episode, but very much a filler (but in a good way, just that it's moving the story on rather than climaxing with anything).

    My biggest problem with it was there were two big reveals that completely went over my head

      Hide contents

     

    Uncle benjen or whatever his name is. No **** idea who that is

    and the guy who was brought out in chains by that guy who did the Red Wedding. No idea who that is.

     

    Should I know them?

    Spoiler

    Chain geezer was Robs unclear who got married at the red wedding and Benjen too Jon to the wall before desappearing on a mission above the wall.

     

    • Like 1
  9. 6 minutes ago, Phumfeinz said:

    Yep, or £435,903,389.47

     

    Didn't the article say that's only how much money he's put aside for Aston Villa? Half a billion is nothing to be sneezed at.

    No it said that is how much he had sold one of his companies for and some of it would come our way.

    • Like 1
  10. 3 minutes ago, Richard said:

    I do not think w will wait for an official takeover to appoint a new manager. Or for a takeover to be officially announced

    Similar to MONs arrival or do you just not believe the Takeover has any substance?

  11. 10 minutes ago, Davkaus said:

    There are two ways of fighting, the honourable way, and winning. :P 

    So, the Hound's coming back? Some sort of repentance story arc with him killing the Mountain as he's about to do something terrible seems likely.

    Hound will probably to be the churches Champion against the Mount in any trial by combat that may happen. If he is alive. 

  12. 7 minutes ago, Stevo985 said:

    No one liners? 

    I'm in!

    No seriously, I would quite like to see this given the positive reviews. Do I need to see the other Captain America films first? Because they kinda look like they suck balls so I'd rather not.

    The 2nd cap film is probably one of the best Marvel films to date. You probably could get away with not watching them but wouldn't recommend it.

×
×
  • Create New...
Â