Jump to content

Eligius

Full Member
  • Posts

    365
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Eligius

  1. 2 hours ago, fightoffyour said:

    The tourism argument is noncense as well, Buckhingham Palace would bring in far more money as a visitor attraction.

    It already is a tourist attraction and for a few years people have been able to pay to go inside .

    • Haha 1
  2. 2 hours ago, mjmooney said:

    Well, quite apart from the argument that charity is an abrogation of government responsibility, you don't need a monarchy to have a charity. Are you seriously suggesting that people only donate to (say) the RSPCA or the RNLI because of the "R" in the name? 

    No I am not suggesting that people only donate to charities because they have Royal in the name but having a Royal patron or president provides vital publicity for the work of these organisations, unless Prince Andrew is a patron of course 😄

  3. Plenty of under privileged people mainly youngsters have been helped tremendously by Royal charities which is something you can't put a price on in what the monarchy brings to many, some of the poorest in society have been funded by Prince Charles's charity in setting up businesses and have gone on to run successful companies whilst taking on staff from the very same social poor background. Plus, the hundreds of charities that have a Royal as patron have helped in gaining extra funds to help the under privileged people, animals etc. 

     

    If people feel better about their lives by having a party and celebrating the jubilee then good for them, because over the last few years there hasn't been much to be cheerful about.

    • Confused 1
  4. I thought McGinn was very good especially in the first half, Barnes was lucky not to get a red card and we should have won if it wasn't for Pope who made some outstanding saves. A disapointing result but overall we were the better team, already looking forward to see who we buy to improve the first eleven.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...
Â