Jump to content

Villa_Vids

Established Member
  • Posts

    1,181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Villa_Vids

  1. 9 minutes ago, Caravella82 said:

    I did not like the plans for the North stand and I'm glad that the plans were paused for that reason. If our name and crest had been removed from the plans nobody would be able to guess the work had been done for Aston Villa and Villa Park.

    I would just like an Architect to design something that can be unique to Villa and still looked upon fondly in 100 years rather than a design with half of its frontage consisting of glass forcing me to think its Anfield 2.0 rather than a modern representation of what most people believe to be iconic Villa Park.

    I agree. I think the warehouse is a better fit than Villa Live aesthetically.

    Rebuild the Doug Ellis stand into a larger main stand and recreate the old trinity facade.

    • Like 4
  2. Just now, Alakagom said:

    One thing these new salary caps and revenue/wages restrictions mean is that new stadium is almost a necessity to keep up with the big 6. Can't see any other way Villa can keep up. Which I'm sure they know it too given the recent appointments to the board seem to indicate as thus. 

    1000 per cent. A new stadium or significant redevelopment of VP is a must.

  3. Just now, Czarnikjak said:

    I don't remember anybody protesting Xia in his first season when he was spending money left, right and center. I think you making this up.

    I am not making this up. I said "silently" protesting. I.E we don't fully believe in the leadership or direction of the club. Prior to Xia - we had years of poor football/results at VP, bad owner, poor managers, poor players which alienated fans. Trust was broken. There is no context to your original post. Most clubs will have big attendance dips if they had the years of decline and experiences that we had. 

    People were questioning Xia from the outset, then we had not so popular managerial appointments added on top with poor football. It is important to remember we were still one of the highest attended clubs in the championship (over 30k), if not the highest by the time of our return to the top flight. This is always never considered but only that our support is "fickle". Our core support is loyal.

    Our attendances rocketed under NSWE and Smith in the championship to over 40k, which showed our attendances can be increased when trust is regained with the wider fan base. IF we had that set up after Lerner, we would have had over 40k in our first championship season imo.

    The capacity increase is about finding that sweet spot inbetween 50k-60k imo.

    • Like 1
  4. 23 minutes ago, Czarnikjak said:

    I am not sure  we could regularly fill over 50k, nevermind 60k.

    Our fan base is fickle and not that dedicated when results drop off.

    When in Championship our average attendance was 32k, while Newcastles was 51k...98% capacity of their stadium.

    Those are numbers without context though. We had a lot fans silently protesting ownership of the club too.

  5. 4 minutes ago, Lichfield Dean said:

    He does stretch the truth a bit at times doesn't he? I mean, yes, the original Villa Park was built in 1897 but it isn't like any of that still exists (as far as I'm aware) yet he makes it sound like we are actually playing in a Victorian stadium.

    He is promoting our heritage and history. Fair play.

    • Like 1
  6. 13 minutes ago, ender4 said:

    Only in terms of adding 1.500 extra Premium seats. Which is fine for now. I still expect Atarios to come out with much much bigger plans in due course.

     Heck mentions rebuilding and adding to VP. This, I suspect, is over a longer period. Heck's job is very much looking for further short term growth.

    I am expecting bigger news on VP redevelopment this summer. The delay on the NS may have been waiting on Atairos joining the club as a funding partner for the new ns and other projects.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...
Â