brommy

A small sample size - I was at a barbers in Rubery for 20 minutes on Saturday morning. 4 football shirts were spotted passing on the high street. I'm pleased to say 3 were Villa (including a circa 1988 Hummel Mita Copiers home shirt) but the fourth was a lad in a man citeh shirt. I'm assuming it would have been a manu shirt around a decade ago.

11 minutes ago, AshVilla said:

I wonder if we can go for any of the targets he had lined up for Sevilla prior to him joining or if it will be stipulated in his exit deal from them that we can't.

Will be interesting.

That could be difficult to enforce as it would be difficult to prove Villa weren't already interested in the same player(s) prior to Monchi switching to us.

1 hour ago, alreadyexists said:

DHUTWU?

MONCHI MAGIC!

1 hour ago, AshVilla said:

I wouldn't pay more than 20m.

I expect Leicester will believe Barnes adds more value than £20m in their attempt to return to riches of the Premier League. Unless Barnes refuses to play in the Championship, I'd be very surprised if they accept less than £30m.

1 hour ago, thabucks said:

Anyone  know if there’s a chance that they could tweak the design to add an extra couple of thousand seats or would that need a whole new planning application. Could they raise the roof a few metres or tweak the flanks? The new Anfield Road stand is a similar design and will seat circa 16k… 

I don't imagine the club will significantly change the designs to accommodate a couple of thousand extra seats. The next phase exactly doubles the current North Stand capacity of 6537 to 13074 with another 636 added to the Trinity and 235 added to the D.E. via the wraparound of the lower tiers. I guess where the new North Stands ends and the Trinity or D.E. begins on the lower tiers is dictated by which stand the seats are accessed from.

If you count all the new seats as added capacity of the new North Stand work, it's capacity is 13945. Villa made a decision to keep some of the existing character of Villa Park by not doing a complete wraparound design and not enclosing the upper tier connections to the Trinity and D.E.. This has probably reduced the feasible capacity by a couple of thousand.

Cons -

Reduced potential income (assuming the success of the team means we fill those couple of thousand seats above the proposed 50k.

Pros -

Lower construction cost;

Maintains more of the Villa Park identify;

No awkward looking angles as the profile of the new North meets the differing profiles of the upper Trinity and D.E. stands (this is unavoidable for the lower wraparound);

Slightly lower transport access concerns.

40 minutes ago, Captain_Townsend said:

I am beginning to think they have over complicated this by planning on incorporating new dressing rooms, moving the tunnel etc. This has no doubt made the stand a more complex project and will also involve a lot of reconfiguration of the Trinity- our newest stand.

I would ne inclined to just get a new stand up and then figure out the Witton Lane.

That would be a catalogue of missed opportunities.

Villa have obviously identified what the possibilities are and will tackle the issues at the first and best opportunity. It might add 5% or 10% and another month or two but on a project costing £100m+, probably over a two year timeline, it's very little pain for long term gain.

Not doing it in the next phase, people would be looking back in a decade's time and saying - these facilities could have been so much better - why didn't they do it when the North Stand was rebuilt around 2025? Now the costs are even higher and Villa have missed out on a decade of improved facilities and income.

4 hours ago, MrBlack said:

Complete speculation really.

Not sure why Purslow would have a vested interest in saving face over that decision such that he'd leak that to the media. 

As BBC Sport aren't on the VillaTalk speculation blacklist, I thought it valid to reference. In any case, during the off-season, VillaTalk exists on 95% speciation and opinion.

55 minutes ago, ender4 said:

Do you have a link?  I doubt a CEO would leave his job over season ticket pricing and I also doubt that our owners would get involved in pricing decisions - they employ people like Purslow, who then employs someone else to make that call on pricing. 

Simon Stone at BBC Sport wrote - it was thought he [Purslow] was uneasy about the massive hike in season ticket prices Villa announced in April.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65876630

3 minutes ago, rodders0223 said:

Yeah I renewed.

**** you purslow.

If that's a statement against the price rise, the BBC ran an article on Purslow leaving, saying he was unhappy at the rise. I wonder if the rise was ultimately forced by NSWE and not Purslow.

8 minutes ago, S-Platt said:

I agree on the 30k waiting list being inflated due to it being free and no commitment should you get a chance to buy one.

If they really wanted to know who is serious then they could make you buy membership to join it.

 

Given the decades of underachieving since our League, European and 2 League Cups in 3 seasons heights, it's testament to our great fan base that even when Gerrard was here, we've had such a large waiting list and every game was 40,000 plus. Even over some poor seasons our fan base has increased over the past couple of decades.

Sure, the waiting list of 30k+ could be described as inflated but it's only natural that the waiting list is dynamic, with fans' financial, geographical and family and health circumstances changing all the time. The extent of those reasons being used will depend on the quality of the football on offer, but I think only relegation would see us not sell out the future season ticket capacity of around 35k and thus end the waiting list.

I'm pleased that over 29k of my fellow 30k season ticket holders have continued to commit but not so pleased if it means the club will take it as a sign to increase prices above next year's lower inflation rate.

Ideally but also realistically, I'd like to see 52,000 at Villa Park with 40,000 season ticket holders all paying the same amount as now in real terms (allowing for inflation). However, I suspect Villa Park will stay at 50,000 for a good while after the next expansion and the club will restrict STs to 35,000, knowing that match day rate tickets are more lucrative.

2 hours ago, turvontour said:

Why would the team not performing put a dent in the waiting list? I think relegation probably would. But not bottom half football. There was 25k on the waiting list before Emery joined and we probably had an average league position of about 19th in the premier league over the last 5 years 

There's a difference between someone expressing an interest by putting their name on a no-cost waiting listing and actually committing the larger part of one thousand pounds for a season ticket. Assuming the club will continue to offer around 75% of home capacity to ST sales, the new North Stand will add around another 5500 season tickets and another 1900 match day tickets. If we perform well, those 5500 STs will probably be brought by the first 7000 on the list (there'll always be some that can't buy due to a change of various circumstances).

Perform at a below mid-table level and more people will find a reason not to renew (especially given the current high prices), so in effect they'll be more than an additional 5500 STs to sell and, I believe a higher proportion of waiting list people will say 'thanks, but I can't at the moment', thus reducing the waiting list. I also expect many of those currently on the list form a high proportion of the 10k (12k with the new North) 'match day' tickets the club need to sell, so if the waiting list was hit hard by a combination of the extra capacity and poor performance, it could be an issue.

As a season holder of 35 years, I think they previously represented okay value when we were playing average and good value when we were performing well. My concern now is the current demand for tickets will be further capitalised on by the owners. Another price hike like this summer's would be very, very disappointing to many fans who've attended through thick and thin.

Hopefully the expansion to 50k and possibly 52k soon afterwards will help address the supply and demand balance and the owners won't pursue above inflation rises.

1 hour ago, sidcow said:

If we've still got a massive waiting list, with 10 plus years likely, they'll surely have to look at further expansions. 

Maybe a full rebuild of Witton Lane Stand. 

I like to think the 50k capacity will be achieved, whatever happens on or off the pitch but if the UK gets awarded the 2028 Euros (decision this September, I believe), I'll be more confident.

I'm sure the club will want to see what the demand for general seating and the financially rewarding corporate hospitality is, once the new North Stand has been built. The new North, increasing the number of season tickets by a guesstimated 5000, will give a good insight into how serious those on the waiting list are. If those extra STs are taken up by less than the first 10k on the list, leaving over 20k still waiting, that could drive whether they proceed with the next 2.2k phase (although it's still a mystery to the general public where in Villa Park this proposal will be, so hopefully Purslow didn't take the blueprints with him!). Conversely, if the team isn't performing well in the lead up to the North Stand opening, the waiting list could be dented significantly. This could put a medium term hold on further expansion as the club will know those left on the waiting list will form a key part of 'match day' sales, of which they'll still need around 15000 of. 

Success on the pitch will be absolutely critical to drive the expansion above 50k but I still think it'll be quite a few years before the stand on Witton Lane is rebuilt, not least because of the cost associated with the road, residential park and nearby occupied housing.

16 hours ago, Villaphan04 said:

One of our partner clubs with V Sports. Believe the club is owned by Nassef's family. Promoted to the Egypian Premier League!

 

 

Without my reading glasses, I had to zoom in to check that wasn't Bielsa in the middle!

Congratulations go to ZED and their fans. Also, as already posted, their promotion can't harm our link/benefits.

2 minutes ago, sidcow said:

West Ham have been the lead news item (main news, not sports news) today.  I think that can dispel the theory that this is a nothing competition. 

I wonder however if we'll be the main news item should we win it in 12 months time. 

Winning it is a decent sized obstacle for us to overcome but that hasn't stopped me from noting the large reaction from the broad stream media and wondering how they'd cover us.  This morning's BBC news' 'live updates', focused entirely on WHU's win, was pinned to their main news page.

There's not many truly neutral fans that wouldn't pick Villa as the bigger club, so IF we were to win it next year, it will be interesting to see how national  the media really is.

3 minutes ago, rjw63 said:

Our Jood going to Reeeeeel Madrid mate. 

Absolute disgrace mate, less money than Greasy Viler mate. 

Send the peaky blinders to sort em, Matey-mate. 

 

 

 

 

Mate. 

Rumours of the sell-on share of the profit (£60.95m) due to sha vary from 15% (£9.1m) to 5% (£3m) as reported in German media.

As ridiculous as £86m (100m Euro) is for any football player, Real will probably get good long term value from the deal, especially compared to the £100m Villa received for Grealish who was 6 years older when he moved.

Just wondering if Dortmund will retire his shirt number, having played more games and created much more profit than for his previous club.

4 minutes ago, jim said:

Bellingham signing for £88m

100m Euro, or £85.95m at the current exchange rate.

As ridiculous as £86m for a football player seems, Real will probably get good long term value from the deal.

1 hour ago, ender4 said:

Actually if you took out the cost of the 2 pints and a programme (£14), then the cost for actual access to the lounge is £11 per game.  

If they sold it on that basis, it would sound much much better, and most people who pay for that £11 access would buy 2 drinks anyway.

 

I get what you're saying but I think that's still too much for most, especially as many are not fussed about the programme.

£15 including 2 drinks (no programme) would see me spending £45 for my 3 ST family on a few occasions each season. At £75, I might do it once out of curiosity but I have a feeling the novelty would wear off and I'd end up feeling ripped off.

I now have a vision of Obi-Wan Purslow waving his hand across me whilst saying 'You're not the football fan we're looking for'.

1 hour ago, sidcow said:

So I suspect they will fill Terrace View mainly by encouraging other corporate seats to move there from other areas.

Then they can sell the vacated areas as "new" corporate packages.

Could be a sign that existing upper Holte season ticket holders haven't jumped at the chance like they thought they might.

I think they misinterpreted the survey results. I expressed an interest, naively thinking it might be a fiver each to enter and I'd treat my family of 3 ST holders a few times per season. I'm not sure if on the day access will even be available, but to commit £480 extra per season is too much for most. At just over £25 per game, it's too expensive even if it includes two pints and a programme.

On 21/03/2023 at 18:06, Made In Aston said:

Peter Big Calves incoming! 

Gave me Tony Moon vibes.

24 minutes ago, Dale said:

Yes. Hedge fund owned clubs have historically done very well, it's why Coventry were regular finishers in Europe under Sisu

In fairness, they'd bite their 12th toe off to swap places with cov.

3 minutes ago, useless said:

 

That's great news. A fantastic player, key to our future success.

56 minutes ago, Newry_Villan said:

We can't turn on Unai at the first sign of a bad run. 

But he's not won a game since Sunday. Not yet cabbage worthy but the Brussels sprout is at hand.

Feels like a Purslow decision. How can someone so increasingly marginalised still make so many bad decisions?

A big thank you to Ash for his fantastic contribution over both times at our club. Some great memories.

11 minutes ago, Pinebro said:

Shocking isn't it.

This is why it has a bad reputation. Fifa is giving it the tinpot treatment.

Perhaps you'll be consoled that next year's final ground is a new 32500 seater. A 68% increase on this season's final capacity.

You seem conflicted. Complaining about the organiser giving the competition 'the tinpot treatment' whilst stating it doesn't excite you anyway, yet frequently posting in a thread dedicated about it.