Poodle

I don't understand your point.

Can't speak for nick, but Nike products are usually very good quality, whereas Hummel are pretty poor, and wear after a few months. Thats why they don't sponsor many clubs, while Nike sponsor a fair few 'big' clubs. As a runner, I can assure you that Nike is far from the best quality in terms of runnings shoes and clothes, well behind Ascics, Addidas, Reebok amongst others...so I think the quality thing is a myth based on people being force marketed to. In addition this years kit was the best quality kit I have ever owned, by a long long way. Wasn't Nick responding to a comment about the commercial department, surely the commercial department is interested 'mainly' in the monetary part of the club? Hance my initial question.

Fulham fans must be just as happy as us then.

Just found this - what was that Bob Dylan song.... The times they are a changing ........ Certainly are.... good find, just shows the difference in class between the old board and new Nick, I am interested in seeing the research that you have based this opinion on. What is the value of the Nike deal? What is the value of the Hummel deal?

So one of Sorensen/Boruc is going to be happy sitting on the bench? Doubt it... I would bet that Stuart Taylor would still be teh back up if Boruc is brought in.