Jump to content

MessiWillSignForVilla

Established Member
  • Posts

    3,093
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MessiWillSignForVilla

  1. Personally, I think you're way off leemond

     

    In the flash forward, when Walt returns and sees the Heisenberg graffiti, the house looks untouched from fire damage. My opinion is that as Jesse is throwing the oil about, Walt Jr comes out of his room and catches him. Although Jesse is pissed at Walt, I don't think he'd want to hurt his son, not matter how much he hates Walt, so doesn't light it on fire. Then either Walt Jr calls the police and Jesse runs away, or Walt comes back and Jesse confronts him. After that I'm not too sure, but I reckon Walt will "die" from his cancer then go into hiding, hence why the neighbour was frightened to see him. As far as it goes with Hank, I can't see a way of him catching Walt, unless Jesse confesses that what is on the tape is a lie. Him and Saul are the only ones who can testify that the tape is a lie, and I highly doubt that Saul will.

     

    I can't wait for Monday now  :P

  2. Won't be this chap. Why wouldn't Lambert just bring him in early with the other six. He won't be hard to buy. He had other targets? But we have not much to spend. I think he has 5 million left.

     

    What a ridiculous statement. Maybe he wasn't available then? Or Sochaux demanded a big fee as he's one of their best players, so Villa looked elsewhere, couldn't find anyone who was good enough value for money and came back. Also, how do you know he wouldn't be hard to buy? And just because he isn't hard to buy, why does that mean we had to get him in early or it won't happen?

     

    My view of this is that Lambert got in signings early for problem areas he had already identified, and was happy with that. He looked around put a few enquiries in here and there to see if he could get any good players on the cheap, and couldn't find anyone. First few games pass, and Lambert identifies another hole in the squad, IMO midfield creativity. He then goes back to his shortlist of players, picks out players he thinks will rectify this, and tells Faulkner to get player x, which may be a player he's already looked at, or maybe hadn't thought about at the time of the other signings.

     

    I don't know about this Boudebouz story though, it's intriguing that he was completely left out of the Sochaux squad, but it doesn't necessarily mean we're after him. Excited to see who this "signing" turns out to be, if it's true.

  3. I have to say, I was hoping they'd really squander the Bale/TV Money, but it doesn't look like they have. I highly doubt if they still had 'Arry or some other manager they would have had anywhere near as good a transfer window as they have done. AVB is a very talented manager and has made some outstanding signings from Europe that I doubt another British manager would have made (Lambert if he had that sort of money maybe?). Without AVB I don't think Spurs would be anywhere near the standard they currently are, I reckon they'd be in a position to get top 4 if Arsenal and Liverpool slip up, rather than most likely being ahead of those teams for 4th and a chance of breaking the top 3. I thought AVB was very unfairly treated at Chelsea by both Chelsea and the media, but is now showing that he is a very astute and clever manager, unfortunately.

  4. Is it just me or have Mourinho's tactics always been this boring what he's had in this season so far?

     

    He's always been known as pretty boring and defensive manager. I think it was one of Madrid's gripes with him. Remember Inter at the Nou Camp about 4 years ago? They pretty much played with 9 defenders and Eto'o up front, nothing wrong with that though, it's the best way to beat Barca.

  5. Are Ajax having money problems at the minute? I would of expected Eriksen to go for nearer to £20m than £10m, and if rumours are to be believed they're willing to let Alderwiereld, £5m, and Fischer, £6-7m, go too. Maybe it's because I don't understand football's transfer market, but those seem very cheap to me. All three are highly rated and maybe it's just because they want to move on but I don't understand why Ajax are willing to let all three go for so little. Maybe I'm reading too much into it also, just the prices suggested for these players seem so low that it looks like Ajax are will take whatever they're offered for them.

  6.  

    According to their wiki page, they have 24 players, 9 of which are "home-grown", with 1 (possibly 2) being u21. They are also signing Lamela, Eriksen and Chiriches, leaving them with 27 players. All excluding Bale, looks like they will need to leave someone unregistered, or let Holtby and/or Sigurdsson go. I don't like Spurs that much and I think I'm trying to find reasons to bash them, and it's getting a lot harder :(

     

     

    On a side note, John Hartson reckons Bale shouldn't be fined, and if he is it would be ridiculous. Why shouldn't he be fined? He refused to turn up to his job! If anyone in a normal job had done that, or Hartson refused to turn up to his punditry, they'd get fined instantly, or possibly fired, why is it different for footballers. I really hope Tottenham fine him.

     

    Come on, are people this naive?

    Are you seriously comparing a footballer to someone who has a normal job? The sentence itself contradicts you, as footballers obviously aren't normal folk. Some would make around 200k a week to kick a ball, 4 times what a normal to high earner makes a year. Bale is a Tottenham-player on paper, yes, but we all know he is going to Real Madrid. So why be so petty that you fine him for not showing up to practice? They are getting 90M for him, a figure higher than some countries' GDP, do you even think Spurs want him there so anything can happen to him? Imagine if Assou-Ekotto tackles him and he breaks his leg and so on. This deal has reached its final steps, it's the biggest deal in the history of football, all that's left is sour grapes (in many ways warranted) from Tottenham to show that they are in fact running the show here, to keep their dignity and so on. Bale is gone, what does it matter if he spends a couple of days away from the other players and manager? It would be totally weird for him to be there, just imagine it yourself. Hey guys, I'm the best player around here and now I am going to the biggest club in the world to play in the Champions League, enjoy playing Thursdays in the Europa League! Like I said, not one person at Tottenham would want him there either.

     

    You ask "why is it any different for footballers?", well, I think you already know the answer to that question so I don't understand why you are raising it.

     

     

    If Tottenham didn't want him there, then they should've said don't turn up, they didn't AFAIK so he should turn up. I really don't know why it's different for footballers, it sends out a bad message. He has breached his contract, depending on the terms of said contract, that could warrant a sacking, although the norm is a fine. Who gives a shit how much he's transferring for? It doesn't mean he should just ignore his job. Again, if a normal person was moving jobs, they'd still be expected to turn up and work until either their contract expires or their notice is up, or they are put on gardening leave. Why should footballers contracts be treated any differently to normal contracts? They shouldn't. Not just in this respect, but in other examples such as the Suarez racism incident. Again, normal person = sacked, footballer = still earns £100k + and is banned for a bit.

     

    This is why football is slowly circling the pan. People excuse out of order behaviour because they are footballers. They also earn ridiculous sums of money (Normally around £50k p/w, i'd guess roughly 20-30 players in the world earn £200k +) and still don't get punished for this behaviour. As soon as people stop putting up with this, the sooner football can start to get it's soul back.

     

    Oh, and another edit, it's not petty for Tottenham to fine him, it's showing some backbone and doing what is right.

  7. McDonalds workers striking demanding $15 an hour to flip burgers. Who are they **** kidding.

     

    Is that not more to do with the US's ridiculously low minimum wage compared to the cost of living though? McDonalds published a report that for one of their employees to just about stay above the standard cost of living in the US, they need a second full time job on top of their full time job at McDonalds. In that context, I think it's fair they strike.

     

    EDIT: Just had a quick search and found the story on the Daily Mail website, link ->http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2366370/Sample-budget-given-McDonalds-workers-proves-CANT-live-minimum-wages-need-second-job-make-ends-meet.html

  8. According to their wiki page, they have 24 players, 9 of which are "home-grown", with 1 (possibly 2) being u21. They are also signing Lamela, Eriksen and Chiriches, leaving them with 27 players. All excluding Bale, looks like they will need to leave someone unregistered, or let Holtby and/or Sigurdsson go. I don't like Spurs that much and I think I'm trying to find reasons to bash them, and it's getting a lot harder :(

     

     

    On a side note, John Hartson reckons Bale shouldn't be fined, and if he is it would be ridiculous. Why shouldn't he be fined? He refused to turn up to his job! If anyone in a normal job had done that, or Hartson refused to turn up to his punditry, they'd get fined instantly, or possibly fired, why is it different for footballers. I really hope Tottenham fine him.

  9. How many players do Tottenham actually have now? Can they register them all? AFAIK, you have a limit of 25 players in the premier league with at least 8 "home-grown" players. Do they have those 8 players and with all these midfielders they've signed, how big is their squad?

  10.  

    Poor Holtby can't even make the b*tch squad. Would certainly take him at Villa.

     

    Edit: Also where is that other chap who plays left back for them?

     

    Assou-Ekotto? Not in the frame either.

    I heard that he doesn't actually like playing football.

    He only does it because he's good at it (and the money obviously helps). No idea if that's true.

     

     

     

    I've heard that before too, I actually quite like him for it. At least he's honest and says it how it is instead of hiding behind any false pretense of "ambition" or other shit like that.

  11. Finn Laudrup >>> Michael and Brian Laudrup >>> Andreas Laudrup.

     

    Don't forget Mads Laudrup too, Michael's other son.

     

    EDIT: Michael Laudrup's uncle was Ebbe Skovdahl, former Brondby player and one time Aberdeen manager. What a sporting family!

  12. BS1LE_DIMAAqQY8.jpg

     

    That highlights that they have too many midfielders and not enough defenders. That back up back 4 looks awful (for them). Having said that I've never heard of Fryers or Chiriches.

     

    Holtby must be pissed off now though, right? Was signing on a free and spurs push the transfer through early in Jan, now they sign 5/6 players that'll probably be ahead of him. Tottenham have a good team but I imagine the squad harmony won't be fantastic with all those midfielders competing for 3/5 places. Same as at Chelsea, I can see disharmony ruining what should be a great season for them.

  13. For those who keep saying we need a number 10 type player, do you think our midfield is good enough to operate with just 2 players in central midfield rather than 3 we currently do ? I like the idea of 4-2-3-1 but not sure we have the personnell at present to play this formation regularly without leaving our defence too exposed

     

    At home against teams who will shut up shop like Liverpool did on Saturday, yes we could operate with 2 in midfield, i.e. Delph-Westwood, with an AM in front. Away or against the top teams, no we couldn't, that's when we go with a midfield something like Delph-Westwood-KEA and play on the counter.

  14. Milner is ten times the player deplh will ever be

     

    Milner was a good player for us, but no. He wasn't that good, we did extremely well to get what was effectively £24m for him, he is a good Top 6 player, possibly CL player if played in the right position, but he was no world beater. Delph is only 23 and has a lot of potential. Delph will be no world beater either, but he will go on to play for a side that consistently gets into the top 6.

  15.  

    I doubt this signing, if true, is Milner. I wouldn't want him anyway. Don't get me wrong I loved him when he was here, he was a great player for us. But he's now 27, is on huge wages (probably) and is not what we need. He's a pure work rate and guile midfielder, and with 3 years rotting at Man City with inconsistent football, I would say he's not much of an improvement on our current work rate and guile midfielder, Delph. We need a creative midfielder and Milner is not that. Plus I don't like him too much for the way he left.

    Milner sitting in with Westwood and Delph given a more forward role would be very nice though. Also, if we're planning on using a number 10, we absolutely need a Milner-esque engine sitting behind him. We can't do it with the players we've got at the moment

     

    That said, I'm not buying that we're in for him at all

     

     

    I don't think Delph has the technical ability to play that AM/#10 role. He is also that Milner-esque engine IMO. As I said, I don't think Milner would be much of an improvement on what we already have in Delph. Also Sylla who did very well in the work-horse type role last season. We need an AM/#10 who is natural in that position, a Cazorla or Ozil type player, a player comfortable sitting behind the striker.

  16. On twitter there's people saying that he's gone to Arsenal for £25m.

    I don't believe it personally but thought it was worth mentioning it here.

     

    It's just deluded Arse fans. It was started by an account call FootyHumour with a photo of RVP lifting the Premier League trophy. Why would anyone believe that.

    • Like 1
  17. I doubt this signing, if true, is Milner. I wouldn't want him anyway. Don't get me wrong I loved him when he was here, he was a great player for us. But he's now 27, is on huge wages (probably) and is not what we need. He's a pure work rate and guile midfielder, and with 3 years rotting at Man City with inconsistent football, I would say he's not much of an improvement on our current work rate and guile midfielder, Delph. We need a creative midfielder and Milner is not that. Plus I don't like him too much for the way he left.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...
Â