Laursen1977

i also think Everton are better than us and i think if they had our finances they would be in top 4.

Our squad cost £87 million to assemble.

Theirs costs about £67 million. (They've got a £17 million striker in Jo as well)

They also spent £10 million on Beattie and McFadden....£9 million on Johnson....£5 million on Kroldup....

How you working out that if they had our finances they'd be top 4? They've probably had more than us over the years.

I've just seen the news that I've been waiting for, the 'Josef Fritzl Incest Trial' starts today.

I don't know about you, but I know I'll be signing up and giving it a go.

The Camerons were having sunday lunch last week when David remarked to his wife "somethings missing here",

His missus replied "yes, its the cabbage".

That's the funniest joke on here.

To any of the smart arses saying we should never have changed from 4 - 5 - 1....

.....just read this thread, nobody was saying we should stick with 4 - 5 - 1 apart from myself.

So I don't think anybody can criticise MON for the formation change...(apart from me obviously)

29 - 0

That was too easy, had the chance to score the try about 5 times.

17 - 0 now.

England running riot.

The whole appeal of Felliani is that he's a donkey with brilliant hair.

Now he's just a donkey.

As we need more beards....me in Jan 2008 in Lisbon

]

Would have been more subtle if she'd just wrote 'McCleish is shit'

I like the bit about the Blues fan with his can of lager

Wish I'd taken my girlfriend to Villa Park for Valentines, I reckon she'd have punched me in the face

ref gives all the descisions to wales.

That's because England have no discipline.

Are you going to rent/download it or actually go to the cinema? That would narrow it down a bit..

Rent. And by rent, I mean legally download

Where can I 'rent' a film from?

Great try that.

The Godfather said he'd make Milner an offer he couldn't refuse, but Milner refused it.

After going 17 points up on the same opposition....

If we maintain what we got against them last season....

That would give us 77 points, which was more than Liverpool got to take 4th last season, which was the highest total for 4th ever....

The leaning tower of Pisa was perfectly straight, until James Milner leant on it.

Joe Calzaghe today retired from boxing after hearing James Milner was set to enter the light heavyweight division.

1 - Bosingwas 'assault' on a Liverpool player and not being punished

Linesman saw it, nothing the FA can do.

To be fair

Gerrard

Carragher

Hyppia

Reina

Skrtel

For the price of Fellaini

Pointless cause nobody will own the club whilst Doug is alive.

Hear hear...wait..oh.

Doing on average 5/6k at the moment taking about half hour.

You running with medicine balls attached to your legs??

What kind of a post is that???

Just commenting on how slow it is. Don't take it to heart.

There's another 10 minutes to come off that time.

Doing on average 5/6k at the moment taking about half hour.

You running with medicine balls attached to your legs??

So with 9 away games to go we've already won as many points away from home as last season? Or have I (once again) read that wrong?

Yep.

We got 27 last year.

21 so far this season.

Also, ALL that your stats show is that we have improved since we moved to 4-5-1/4-3-3 whatever you want to call it.

You COULD argue, that with JC's better goals/minute ratio, we would be even better if we dropped Gabby and played JC upfront.

Doubt it.

Gabby makes goals out of nothing.

Carew doesn't.

Based on what stats?

The stats CLEARLY show John Carew to score more often than Gabby when he's on the pitch.

Look, I'm making a point here - I too would also start Gabby ahead of John Carew. That is because of what I have seen so far this season. NOT because of what stats do and don't say.

In fact, you just blew your whole arguement out of the water and proved me right. You're using STATS to 'prove' we are a better team without John Carew (as it suits your personal opinion)

When the STATS 'prove' John Carew to be more effective than a player you favour... you choose to ignore them.

Point proven.

End of discussion.

For a fair comparison, you'd need to see Carew play in this formation.

Personally I think he'd struggle, whereas Gabby has thrived.

What the stats show is, Carew scores more goals than Gabby when they're paired together, which isn't the point...

Also, ALL that your stats show is that we have improved since we moved to 4-5-1/4-3-3 whatever you want to call it.

You COULD argue, that with JC's better goals/minute ratio, we would be even better if we dropped Gabby and played JC upfront.

Doubt it.

Gabby makes goals out of nothing.

Carew doesn't.