Jump to content

Deisler123

Full Member
  • Posts

    454
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Deisler123

  1. 29 minutes ago, Dr_Pangloss said:

    Yes, hard to see how this will be a benefit to us. Chinese players are **** terrible, and they will be terrible for a long time. 

    the benefit is huge. And I am only talkin about direct benefit from transfer fee.

    For example, Athletico Madrid got a Chinese player 4 years ago, who played in their youth team then in B team. He is nowhere close to the 1st team. 

    Last year, he was bought by Guangzhou Evergrande on a transfer fee of 5 mil euros.

    I can go on but my point is, a direct benefit if there are youth players (with ok quality) from china is, they can be sold back to China with 10-100 times more transfer fee than what they are worth.

    This is simply because China super league only allows 3 foreign and 1 Asian players to play on pitch. 

    Last year, the most expensive domestic player transfer fee was something like 10 mil pounds in China. I highly doubt he can play in the 1st team of any club in the championships.

    • Like 4
  2. Just two days since the take over was announced, the posts on one of the most popular chinese online chatting forum about Aston Villa has increased from 5 a day to 50,000 a day.

    See this: http://tieba.baidu.com/f?ie=utf-8&kw=%E9%98%BF%E6%96%AF%E9%A1%BF%E7%BB%B4%E6%8B%89&fr=search 

    In comparison to Man Utd sub forum where posts are normally around 500,000 to 1.5 mil a day.  http://tieba.baidu.com/f?ie=utf-8&kw=%E6%9B%BC%E8%81%94

    The attention to Villa and the new owner is certainly increasing in China. This is quite encouranging for Xia. I think this may add to his confidence of this take over.

    To fulfill Xia's may-be ambition of making Villa the most famous club in China, he clearly has a lot to work on.

    • Like 2
  3. 9 minutes ago, snowychap said:

    As far as I'm concerned, and this is what I read from Mike's post, it's about possible Chinese government (or Chinese state or CCP, however one may want to term it) backing not about nationality or where someone is from.

    To be fair, even if it's just someone wanting to curry favour with the bods at the top of the CCP then it makes me incredibly uncomfortable at best.

     

    Alright then. Let's just stop here. I guess it is no use to continue conversation on such a controversial topic.

    • Like 1
  4. 9 minutes ago, Rodders said:

    it's hardly difficult. Someone would find having an association connected with corruption, and dodgy human rights ( to put it kindly ) to be a bad thing. Not everyone goes " **** everyone else, let's just get rich regardless of the endorsements and consequences of deals like this may have for legitimising ( possible ) crooks. Image laundering ala other billionaire barons its not everyone's cup of tea, and it's a bit depressing you think that it's bizarre some people think there are more important things than a **** football club. 

    I understand the concern that people may have about someone from China buying the club they like. 

    I was questioning the logic behind the cold-war thinking - just some one from China does not mean he is evil, stalin-like, corrupted with dodgy human rights. You are mixing things up, which is fundamentally wrong when you make judgement on someone. 

    This logic is pathetic - so if for what ever reason someone was sent to the jail, his/her kids will be thought to do the same crime years later? This is correct in terms of human rights you are telling me?

    Sure, there is some uncertainty with this take over. But using China as a 'one-party dictatorship with bad human rights record' is NOT an evidence by a light year to how bad the new owner can possibly be.

     

    • Like 3
  5. 1 minute ago, mjmooney said:

    It's relevant to me. 

    I am sorry - how is  China being ' a one-party dictatorship with an apalling human rights record' relevant to you or your beloved club? 

    Enlighten me please. 

  6. 2 minutes ago, Dr_Pangloss said:

    Would be great if you could amplify on this (if possible). I don't mean this in a bad way, more out of intrigue. as you're bringing a lot of good info to the table.

    sure. I will collect some information and translate here. I have to say all of those are rumours - he has not been convicted to any crime/fraud activities afaik. 

    • Like 1
  7. 3 minutes ago, Swerbs said:

    Please provide sources?

    Yes, later today when I find time to translate a bit more. I dont really want to expose those very negative things you know - people may get really upset about these.

  8. 1 minute ago, Gary Thomas said:

    I agree with this.  There also seem to be a lot of private companies (not listed) that we really know nothing about.  For example, Hollis on the OS said, "If you look at Tony Xia's business career in China, he has been instrumental in the regeneration and the building of over 60 of the new cities and relocating 500 million people into the urban areas."  Well that sounds like a pretty lucrative business but it is probably not listed so the FT or anyone else has no information about it - hopefully Hollis does.

    In China there is little transparency in business - because all companies more or less have involvement of government one way or another. So there is no way you can know a value of a company, unless they want you to know.

    But considering he has got some bad reputation before in China about being fraud (people talked about it), it is 50-50 chance now.

    Better to be positive on this - until you see the negativity - i guess.

    • Like 1
  9. The key thing, in my opinion, is whether or not he has got state-money backing him up.

    From all the evidence I've seen, it is a 50-50 chance.

    As a Chinese, I have seen the recent development in Chinese football league, and I can tell you this:

    If he is all by himself in this take over - i will be very cautiously pessimistic on this. 

    If he is backed up by state money - i am very optimistic.

  10. Just now, sexbelowsound said:

    There is a lot of "Oh My Fuckings Gods" in that translation!

    Potty mouths.

    ye sorry. some of the original comments used strong words, mainly to express their surprise, nothing to do with the club or this take over. I just followed and use that word (only two though) to save my translation time. I will edit it out :)

  11. 7 minutes ago, Phumfeinz said:

    I assume that Dr. Xia meant that if we finish the season below 6th then he'll look at firing the manager, and not that he'll fire the manager during the season if at any time we drop below 6th.

    I hope that's what he meant.

    I checked my original translation and I think my translation is correct. He clearly said, ''anytime during the season....sack the manager anytime... is a clause in the contract...''

    But I think it is not necessary a bad thing - the new owner just wanted to express his ambition and this is a part of it.

    Surely no one will believe he will sack the manager ANYTIME he wants - he is not stupid...

  12. 'we have clauses in the contract with manager. anytime the club is not within the first 6 positions of the league, we can sack him'

    I got to say I laughed there lol..... So watch out the new manager, if you lose the first match, you are sacked!!!!

  13. 3 minutes ago, El-Reacho said:

    Pretty sure the Championship would be the same as the PL where the TV broadcast rights are collective, so one team can't go and negotiate a TV deal for themselves elsewhere.

    Yes, you are right. But the TV channels in China will buy any leagues that has Chinese players in the first team. Dutch league this year for example (Vitesse got 1 Chinese youth player). It is possible if Villa get 1 Chinese player next season, which is quite unlikely due to work permit. Other than that, no it is not gonna happen

  14. No, there is no way the national channel in China (CCTV) will pay to broadcast Championships, unless there is 1-2 Chinese players playing there, which may not happen next season.

    The number of people watching football games is, for example a normal PL game, about 5-15mil. Between Man Utd and Arsenal, could be 40-50mil. So the market is huge which is good for Villa in a long run if the market potential can be exploited.

  15. Hi I am a chinese living in UK for many years and became interested in the recent taking over - want to join the forum for some discussion. 

    TBH not a villa fan yet, but dont really have any team to support  at the moment so why not? Hope it is fine?

×
×
  • Create New...
Â