Jump to content

momo

Established Member
  • Posts

    2,032
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by momo

  1. It's my first real camera. Got it yesterday. DPReview? I have a lot to learn. The 8Gb card is only about a tenner more expensive than the 4Gb card, so if they perform the same I'll go for the bigger one.

  2. And Cuellar isn't better than Mellberg.

    Therefore you rate the transfer as 0 out of 10?

    If Ronaldo left Man Utd (assuming he is now the best player in the world) and United replaced him with the second best player in the world (lets say Kaka for arguments sake) would you rate that transfer as 0 out of 10 just because Kaka isn't as good as ronaldo.

    There's more holes in your logic than a golf course.

    Well if he is worse than Ronaldo, than I can't see the strengthening...the transfers have made Man Utd worse off...

    So they have failed? If they can't keep a player, and replace him with the next best thing, the transfer is a failure? 0 out of 10?!

    In that scenario, that I have painted, how could they get even a 1 out of 10, in your eyes? And if you say "keep Ronaldo" I'll poke them out.

    If they keep Ronaldo and buy Kaka to have him in the reserves, Kaka strengthens the squad, but not the first team...

  3. I wonder why the persons that voted "1" and "4" haven't disclosed their reasons?

    come on! i want to hear the reasons behind the 1 point mark given

    Good buys to strengthen our squad, but have they really strengthened the team?

    I am happy with the buys, except we need an extra forward...The new players are good, but noen of the deserves above 7.

    1. Shorey is not as good as Bouma --> 0 points given

    2. Guzan is a sub --> 0 points

    3. Friedel is old, may last as first choice for just one season, has shown rustiness already-> 2 point

    4. Cuellar: is he better than Davies/Laursen or the man he replaced: Mellberg? No! Bench! --> 0 points

    5. L. Young: good to have a RB --> 5 points

    6. Sidwell gives us strength in depth, but is not a starter unless we use 3 CM and drop one of the three starters we have --> 0 points

    7. Milner: Good to have a right winger --> 6 points

    8. Davies, already was here last year, so not a reinforcement --> 0 points

    9. No striker --> -1

    8 players 12 points is 1,5 points average. I gave 1 point because I think the average was so low!!! Don't be mad! This is just my honest opinion. :shock:

    If I wasn't on a board where I'd get a yellow card for abuse, i'd call you a total idiot who's looking for attention, but I am so i won't say that.

    I will say, however, that if you really rate our window as a 1 out of 10 you are sorely deluded and I fail to see a scenario in which you would even be remotely happy. We have signed 8 quality players this window. i would say the worst player we've signed is Sidwell (albeit I still haven't seen much of Guzan) and if he is the worst then we have done bloody well.

    As I have mentioned elsewhere, at the start of the window an extra striker would have been bottom of the list of priorities. it would have been nice, but we have the same strikers that played the VAST majority of last season, and we were fine.

    I do however doubt that you really think it's a 1 out of 10, some might think you were looking for attention, but I can't say that.

    Someone needs to lighten up a bit here...If I wouldn't get carded for calling you an idiot I would too! I love attention :?

  4. And Cuellar isn't better than Mellberg.

    Therefore you rate the transfer as 0 out of 10?

    If Ronaldo left Man Utd (assuming he is now the best player in the world) and United replaced him with the second best player in the world (lets say Kaka for arguments sake) would you rate that transfer as 0 out of 10 just because Kaka isn't as good as ronaldo.

    There's more holes in your logic than a golf course.

    Well if he is worse than Ronaldo, than I can't see the strengthening...the transfers have made Man Utd worse off...

  5. 4. Cuellar: is he better than Davies/Laursen or the man he replaced: Mellberg? No! Bench! --> 0 points

    He hasn't even played yet.

    Thats actually ludicrous momo, honestly.

    I know it seems harsh, but that's the way I see it...

    And Cuellar isn't better than Mellberg.

    And I gave 1 point because someone gave 10...

    Realistically we can agree that the transfers deserves a 5. Remember, we did not get our first choice RB or first choice RW, and most of our buys are only backups.

    In my reckoning we are 15% better than last year...which is good!

  6. I wonder why the persons that voted "1" and "4" haven't disclosed their reasons?

    come on! i want to hear the reasons behind the 1 point mark given

    Good buys to strengthen our squad, but have they really strengthened the team?

    I am happy with the buys, except we need an extra forward...The new players are good, but noen of the deserves above 7.

    1. Shorey is not as good as Bouma --> 0 points given

    2. Guzan is a sub --> 0 points

    3. Friedel is old, may last as first choice for just one season, has shown rustiness already-> 2 point

    4. Cuellar: is he better than Davies/Laursen or the man he replaced: Mellberg? No! Bench! --> 0 points

    5. L. Young: good to have a RB --> 5 points

    6. Sidwell gives us strength in depth, but is not a starter unless we use 3 CM and drop one of the three starters we have --> 0 points

    7. Milner: Good to have a right winger --> 6 points

    8. Davies, already was here last year, so not a reinforcement --> 0 points

    9. No striker --> -1

    8 players 12 points is 1,5 points average. I gave 1 point because I think the average was so low!!! Don't be mad! This is just my honest opinion. :shock:

  7. I really want to mention a "sport" I really hate....Air Pistol....what is that??? Like shooting birds with your Nintendo 64! All the sports you mention in the poll above actually requires sweat and tears...but shooting???? It's lame!

    Not to mention water polo...very funny though.

×
×
  • Create New...
Â