TerryCzap

Thanks. I missed the spell check process.

Hi Tom, I will assist you in putting some context to your thoughts, since I am fairly familiar with a situation that would apply here. I do know of someone who suffers from schizophrenia very badly. It is very plain for anyone to see. He claims to hear voices and says that he receive revelations from an invisible God. His name is George Bush, and as you know is Commander of the most powerful, most deadly military the world has ever seen. He claims to have heard a voice which told him to invade Iraq. This in and of itself was somewhat of a horrible situation, but Mr. Bush could not do this alone. He needed someone to believe in his schizophrenia. Lo and behold, up pops the Poodle/Clone (Tony Blair) who must also be suffering from schizophrenia, for he stood behind Mr. Bush in these hallucinations. Then Mr. Blair and Mr. Bush send each other little secrets that their spin doctors create which are released to the press. My question is this; If this psychopath (Mr. Blair) tells you that you must send your children and citizens to be sacrificed in more pointless wars (Iraq/Iran); would you do it? Since most men in western civilizations are somewhat literate (I know, I’m being generous here) they must be somewhat informed that some of their tax dollars are spent killing innocent people and raping them literally, and also of their resources. Everyone knows that these murderous activities are against the law of the land, yet you are asked to be an accessory to murder by paying a soldier to do your killing for you. My second question is this’; would you be an accomplice to murder by paying for it? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” - Henry Kissinger

I know of the group, but not their beliefs. U.S. and not an SDA or ever been. Say, do you think Beth will answer my questions? Thanks Sparky. I don't know if Beth will answer or not, that is why I was checking into it. We have lots of people who have hounded us for years, throwing questions at us... etc. In reality they did not want answers, but rather, only wanted us to follow their agenda of how they felt we should live.

SDA is short for Seventh Day Adventis.

Sparky, Do you already have some background on the group in question? Do you live in the U.S.? Would I be correct to conclude you are an SDA or have been one in the past? Terry

I've got to hand it to you snowy, except for the last line about the 48, it is the first reasonable thing you've posted since I've been on this thread. You are not blind, just stubborn. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, "higher education" destroys knowledge, governments destroy freedom, corporate media destroys information, and religions destroy the voice of God.

Terry - Why did you not answer my question ?? Hi Billy, Bible translations are not much of an issue to me. Men read their favorite version of the bible, but they do not hear the voice of God in their soul. The bible to them has become a dead letter, for they do not want to obey it anyway (Thou shalt not kill, Remember the Sabbath day). If a man was stranded on a desert island with no bible of any kind, he could still read the Word in the sunset and hear Father in the “still small voice”. I hear God speak in a nursery rhyme and in the call of the coyote echoing through the canyon. I also hear Him in the “pure fiction” that you refer to. The real question is; do you hear God saying “This is my beloved son (Michael) in whom I am well pleased.”? Can you read, understand, and accept that Travesser is the long awaited for return of Christ? This is the living Word, can you hear it?

I prevously stated a few posts above, "The context of all but one entry remained identical as was posted. Isn’t that what the “edit” option is for?" I admit that I spoke to hastily and will change that to "the context in all entries remained identical".

I wrote my original post purposefully and in such a manner that one would have to be on drugs or inebriated to not know I was with Strong City. No one could have said what I said unless they were here. It was a no brainier. In your post on page 5 you implied I was being deceptive in my first statement. In my united response to you, I stated that there was no dishonesty (deception) involved. So by adding the sentence, not for you, but for future readers, I only clarified what was already stated by me - there was no deception involved. In this light, the context of the post did not change in the slightest.

My 3rd post on page 5.

It is true that I did go and proof read and edit most of my posts, but except for adding one line to one post as well as the song link, I only changed typos and bad grammar. The context of all but one entry remained identical as was posted. Isn’t that what the “edit” option is for? T.C.

Well folks.... it has been very enjoyable and educational to visit with you on your forum. Some of you have taught me that the atheist/infidel has a very big goal in life; it is to bring doubt into the mind of anyone who believes in the one true God and His Son. He is not curious as to this Being, but his questions are only meant to tear down and even kill the faith that one may have in this Divine Ruler. The atheist is not content to let others enjoy their “fairytale”, but must strive to bring them out of it. This was something I have never recognized before. It may be that if someone reading this thread asks some pertinent questions in the future, then I would respond to them. Short of that, this will likely be my last post. Now, not only is the “End Of The World Cult” film available to misconstrue what our purpose has been; but as a fitting exclamation mark, Prudence was able to come on here and sling some more mud also. This is a perfect way to make an exit and let everyone make their decision about what is true, and what is the manufactured lie. Snowychap, we certainly could go in circles about everything I say for the next five years, but it only makes me get dizzy, I’m getting off the merry-go-round. Regards, Terry

But Prudence, I've looked at your site. You never once say what you are mad about. Michael has asked you this very question on your site also, but you did not answer him either. Oh, well, if it gets more people to your site to advertise it here, more power to you. I wish you well.

I’d have to take your word for it about how a pimp treats his whore. I would say though, at least the harlot would have the honesty and integrity of character to give an answer to the question - she could probably give many answers. This I have yet to hear from Prudence. And Prudence; you are free to exercise your imagination disecting my actions as much as you'd like. You continue to fulfill the biblical definition of the "accuser of the bretherren" as you do this. And yes, I go to your web site on occasion. Why not? You write about me and post pictures of me and my friends. You have dedicated your life and a web site to slander us. Would it be unusual for someone like myself to go there? I get a good laugh when I read what you have to say. If you were not doing this, I don't believe I would go to your site, unless I just wanted to see how you were getting along.

delete