myb

I was disappointed that carew was not on the pitch longer

Personally i felt that tactically MON got it spot on. They were playing pretty high tempo, closing us down and getting amongst us. The timing of the substitute was absolute key. They were beginning to tire and our class would eventually show, it was just down to whether we could get that chance, which we did.

Anyone who questions Gabi's appetite again needs shooting. 2 late, late goals to win 3 points on 2 separate occasions in their backyard needs immortalising, not slating. What a hero.

just be worried about the abuse the scumbags are likely to give him in light of his recent loss.

well you play NRC in centre mid and whadd'ya know... **** immense!! We brought a box 2 box centre midfielder 2 years ago and finally, finally gave him a game in his natural position. Not on the right, not on the right of a three, not at right back, not on the the right wing but in centre midfield. Superb.

Well - there you have it, the guy is released, despite killing over 100 people.

Nicely done, yoghurt crew.

Yep some guy convicted because a Maltese Shirt saleman said he bought a shirt in his shop

It was never the safest of convictions

Maybe, but letting him out now will just stir it up again, as shown by the trimuphant return home.

I'm not entirely up to speed with this case, but that comment is entirely absurd. We keep a 'potentially' innocent man locked up on the basis that there maybe political fallout if we free him. The double standards are alarming. We have the ablity to be as corrupt in this country as we make out the rest of the world are.

why start your biggest goal threat as substitute???

John Carew injured himself in the warm up so was replaced by Delfounso on the bench.

still doesn't explain the decision to not start him prior to injury.

why start your biggest goal threat as substitute???

Beckett is as corrupt as any. Would be a great leader of that lot.

I think you'll find a whole lot more civil, level headed people across the country who would agree with those policies.

The policies quoted were from UKIP and the BNP - the same for both - you may think that is civil, level headed I beg to differ.

So it's unreasonable, possibly even racist, to agree with a policy on freezing immigration in a country which seems fit to burst and can't even look after the people already here?

It's also unreasonable to expect that as soon as we discover that an immigrant is an illegal immigrant, that they should be sent packing on the next plane out of the country?

Is it unreasonable to expect that migrants, who come and settle here, then commit criminal offences, are sent home either upon release from prison, or before?

I don't see any issues at all with those policies.

We will freeze immigration for five years, speed up deportation of up to a million illegal immigrants by tripling the numbers engaged in deportations

we call for an immediate halt to all further immigration, the immediate deportation of criminal and illegal immigrants, and the introduction of a system of voluntary resettlement

bet they didn't tell UEFA that when they bid to host the final.

The only thing i would say, apart from the ref being shocking is this: Didier Drogba - Karma does exist. Maybe you'll give some thought to the amount of cheating, diving and feigning of injury (such as last night which led to a large chunk of the time added on) you have been guilty of in the past, and wonder to yourself whether or not it is that which has cost you a place in the Champions League Final.

you'll be eaten by the lions!!! if hull fans sing 'mauled by the tigers' *credit to PompeyVillian*

Thats the gayest chant in the lead, I pray to McGrath no one sings that!

when i was young i had a dream

to watch the greatest football team

and here i am the dream is real

with randy learner & matin o'neill!

that is absolute class

brilliant. There was another chant i've been hearing recently - think it may be the same one as mentioned above by Grievemeister... anyone shed any light on it!?

idiot. last week when we played Moscow he had lots more callers than usual who were putting him in his place (possibly because WM were the only ones with commentary on the game). He really struggled - it wasn't his usual audience and he couldn't cope with the stick he was getting. About time to.

James Milner played Chelsea on his own today. And only got beat 1-0.

It was actually James Milner that landed the plane on the Hudson River. He just couldn't be arsed with the fuss after so let the other pilot take the credit.

Copy me post will you myb?

oooops... thought i'd read the thread and hadn't seen it yet. There was me thinking I was being a smart arse.

James Milner wouldn't make schoolboy errors like that.

^^ because it's funny?? get a sense of humour.

It was actually James Milner that landed the plane on the Hudson River. He just couldn't be arsed with the fuss after so let the other pilot take the credit.

General

Do you think we could win the league (i mean, i know we "could", but are you a believer!?!)

you have now won the internet from Mr Rogers.

Great, thanks! What perks does winning the internet bring??

Personally, i think people aim for the inside of the post, particularly when bending a shot round the keeper... the closer it is to the corner, the closer you are to scoring! You can't get no closer to the corner than the inside of the post.

So if you aim on target but it going for the corner flag, hits a defenders arse and goes in the back of the net it's on target? Seriously?

Same equates hitting the post, it's mm's if its in or out, hence it's pot luck and it's off target!

No, cause that would be an own goal.

If you aim for the inside of the post, hit it and score then your shot is on target.

The target is to score a goal, if it hits the woodwork and goes in its a goal, its on target, if it rebounds off the woodwork and doesn't go in, its off target. A sort of close but no cigar situation

Absolute rubbish IMO, it's off target whatever the circumstance, if it goes in off the post, it's the same as an off-target deflection.

Course not!! Your aim is to hit the target (which is the net), and you have succeeded in doing so. The post doesn't move (unlike a goalkeeper) so you know that if you hit the inside of the post it's likely that you'll score. Hits the post and in = on target.

i always thought off. if it hits the woodwork and comes back out it was never going to be a goal. Obviously a shot deflected/tipped onto the post is a shot on target as had it not been deflected, would've gone in! How i see it anyway...!

I've been on a right downer since the turn of the year. Split with my fiance (who i proposed to last xmas day) in the middle of last year. Was ok al over xmas - drinking copious ammounts probably helped! But since New Years Eve etc. i've been pretty down in the dumps!! I'm putting it down to the fact that it was my first xmas in a few without her, feeling skint and going back to work.