Jump to content

supermon

Established Member
  • Posts

    2,973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by supermon

  1. 1 minute ago, GingerCollins29 said:

    Don't think we will, but if you were Emery, would you sacrifice a potential FA Cup run by playing the youth team against boro to focus on the ECL and title/top 4?

    Yes

    • Like 3
  2. We are doing what Newcastle did last year, difference being we've won more and the top two are with distance. This is how the rest of the country will see us and won't take us seriously. I guess enjoy it whilst we can, top 4 needs to be the aim now.

    Screenshot_20231217-214437.png

  3. Why is he on the 3rd page, criminal!  

    What a player, he seemed to be involved in the kafuffle after the Watkins goal, seemed he was taking on the whole Brentford team by himself.

    I see a future captain with him!

    • Like 1
  4. I think we are basically doing what Newcastle did last season. Think we will eventually tail off, just gotta hope we fall.amongst the champions League places but my gosh am i all in for the title ride whilst it lasts. Let's keep the home record up and improve away and you just never know.

     

  5. 1 hour ago, LondonLax said:

    The pass on 1:19 was my favourite. First time ball with such pace and accuracy that it drew a panicked yellow card tackle from Stones. 

    Couldn't agree more,I was shitting bricks but his calmness on the ball is something else

  6. 11 minutes ago, Davkaus said:

    I can see why the temptation is there to pick a person who seems to be a good cultural fit with the team, but what I've seen that tend to boil down to is building teams that become an old boys club, and though rarely deliberate, often ends up with a recruitment trend that'd have your HR team having an absolute **** meltdown if they saw the decision making, as it risks looking racist, sexist and or ageist

    It's not all about experience, and there is plenty of scope for there just being something "off" about the better candidate on paper,  maybe they don't seem trustworthy, or confident, etc, but you need to be careful it isn't "does their face fit" as it risks being very dangerous ground, IMO. Ultimately you're hiring a person to do a job, not recruiting for a new mate.

    Yes good point mate and very true, I am just going by how my previous boss would do things, so it's my first time recruiting someone. She would go for the right fit and try and mould them into the team. 

    I agree it's about the job, the right thing to do is to be professional about it and give it to the best candidate out there

    18 minutes ago, Anthony said:

    Not an answer, but things to consider:

    • Do you have the resource (time/money/expertise/personnel) to train the inexperienced person?
    • How set in their ways are the individuals? Willingness to learn/grow/change habits is much more valuable than accumulated experience.
    • Is the person actually dull, or are they just reserved in an interview situation? Only time will tell.

    No don't really have the time to train this person up to be honest, I think dull was a bit harsh from me, they weren't dull just not as personable than the other candidate. However, people do open up later and show their true side. 

    I think I will go down the experience route, it sits better for me and is the right thing to do

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...
Â