Jump to content

9/11InsideJob

New Member
  • Posts

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 9/11InsideJob

  1. A brand new account on a piss poor wind up. Ain't that cute.

    **** off back to your own forum if you don't like it.

    9/11 you are being a tool though to be fair.

    He's not a Villa fan, mate. Been caught once and banned for winding up our forum and now he's moved on to yours.

    Been going to Villa longer than you've been going to Citeh. Then again, it's not difficult to attend football matches pre-2008.

  2. 1. You had the high attendances in 2003 because of the novelty of a new stadium.

    2. Yeah and in spite of Stockport or Oldham or whoever being the local club of City fans, they hunt glory with a PL club.

    3. I'm talking about away matches too. But I suppose City take a half a million to every away game don't they?

    1)

    2004/5 - 45,192

    2005/6 - 42,856

    2006/7 - 39,997

    2007/8 - 42,077

    So that's a big, Stuart Pearce shaped blip in the middle. Only one season where it's gone under 40k.

    2) Yeah, because we've always been in the Premiership haven't we?

    3) Fact is, most United games home and away are on TV because there's gloryhunter demand for it. You can't watch something that isn't there can you?

    1. The fact is, when the going got tough, the loyal city fans deserted their team.

    2. You've always been bigger than the likes of Rochdale and Oldham. If you support a bigger club than your local one, you're a glory hunter.

    3. So there are no City away matches on TV? Obviously nonsense. There are and there are hardly any City fans in the pubs in Manchester, Withington, Fallowfield, Disbury etc. Try again.

  3. I don't usually come onto opposition forums after a win but I had to comment on this.

    2007 - 39,997

    2008 - 42,126 (when the money came in)

    2009 - 42,899

    2010 - 45,513 (when they were competing for CL)

    This is proof that they are glory hunters.

    City fans think that City are one of the great English clubs. Why do City have 3 stars above their crest? They are nobodies.

    Have you ever seen City win the European Cup?

    2003 - 46,834

    Wow, an increase of 5,000. That's great proof.

    We put 30,000 a match in the seats when we were in Division 3 before any money!

    City fans = glory hunters.

    But they were shit for years and still mainitained a decent sized fan base. I seriously doubt they got their fans as a result of glory. But then again aren't all fan glory hunters? I don't watch Spurs in the hope we don't win any trophies (though we hardly ever do). I want glory, as do fans of all teams.

    Well said, mate.

    In a 2-club area and you were giving tickets away.

    Well done.

    Massive.

    City, United, Bolton, Wigan, Oldham, Bury, Macclesfield, Stockport, Rochdale. Yep, that's two teams alright.

    The fact is that in Manchester, when a United match is on, the pubs are packed to the rafters; when a Citeh match is on, they aren't. And that's in Fallowfield, City Centre, Withington, Didsbury etc.

    It's because we're at the games, not in the pubs.

    You've made my day.

    1. You had the high attendances in 2003 because of the novelty of a new stadium.

    2. Yeah and in spite of Stockport or Oldham or whoever being the local club of City fans, they hunt glory with a PL club.

    3. I'm talking about away matches too. But I suppose City take a half a million to every away game don't they?

  4. Wow, an increase of 5,000. That's great proof.

    We put 30,000 a match in the seats when we were in Division 3 before any money!

    City fans = glory hunters.

    But they were shit for years and still mainitained a decent sized fan base. I seriously doubt they got their fans as a result of glory. But then again aren't all fan glory hunters? I don't watch Spurs in the hope we don't win any trophies (though we hardly ever do). I want glory, as do fans of all teams.

    Well said, mate.

    In a 2-club area and you were giving tickets away.

    Well done.

    Massive.

  5. Please go on about 9/11 theory then.

    Please explain these.

    1. Live pictures and photos clearly of planes on the day.

    2. Mass eye witness accounts, just at the pentagon there was 136 witnesses stating a plane.

    3. phone calls made from the telephones of the plane?

    4. Where are these people now?

    5. Where is the evidence to support it being missiles apart from just sheer make believe?

    Or are you saying they were missiles wrapped in holograms so like live photos and that looked like planes? do we even have that technology? (that's a question, I don't actually know)

    what about all the people dead on the planes? if these planes don't exist or didn't happen, what about these people? :lol:

    seriously WTF.

    1. Live pictures and photos clearly of HOLOGRAMS OF planes on the day.

    2. The "eyewitnesses" saw a plane (which was probably a drone or another hologram) but NOT ONE eyewitness saw that "plane" HIT the Pentagon. A missile hit the Pentagon. The plane pieces on the lawn had been stored in boxes in the Pentagon, and when the missile hit the pentagon, these pieces went everywhere, making it look like a plane had hit the building.

    3. Proven nonsense. Calls couldn't be made from that altitude, and one person said "Hi Mom, it's Mr. (forget the name)". Who says that?

    4. Dead unfortunately.

    5. The damage to the pentagon is consistent with it being hit by a missile, not a plane.

  6. Please go on about 9/11 theory then.

    Please explain these.

    1. Live pictures and photos clearly of planes on the day.

    2. Mass eye witness accounts, just at the pentagon there was 136 witnesses stating a plane.

    3. phone calls made from the telephones of the plane?

    4. Where are these people now?

    5. Where is the evidence to support it being missiles apart from just sheer make believe?

    Or are you saying they were missiles wrapped in holograms so like live photos and that looked like planes? do we even have that technology? (that's a question, I don't actually know)

    what about all the people dead on the planes? if these planes don't exist or didn't happen, what about these people? :lol:

    seriously WTF.

    1. Live pictures and photos clearly of HOLOGRAMS OF planes on the day.

    2. The "eyewitnesses" saw a plane (which was probably a drone or another hologram) but NOT ONE eyewitness saw that "plane" HIT the Pentagon. A missile hit the Pentagon. The plane pieces on the lawn had been stored in boxes in the Pentagon, and when the missile hit the pentagon, these pieces went everywhere, making it look like a plane had hit the building.

    3. Proven nonsense. Calls couldn't be made from that altitude, and one person said "Hi Mom, it's Mr. (forget the name)". Who says that?

    4. Dead unfortunately.

    5. The damage to the pentagon is consistent with it being hit by a missile, not a plane.

  7. Please go on about 9/11 theory then.

    Please explain these.

    1. Live pictures and photos clearly of planes on the day.

    2. Mass eye witness accounts, just at the pentagon there was 136 witnesses stating a plane.

    3. phone calls made from the telephones of the plane?

    4. Where are these people now?

    5. Where is the evidence to support it being missiles apart from just sheer make believe?

    Or are you saying they were missiles wrapped in holograms so like live photos and that looked like planes? do we even have that technology? (that's a question, I don't actually know)

    what about all the people dead on the planes? if these planes don't exist or didn't happen, what about these people? :lol:

    seriously WTF.

    1. Live pictures and photos clearly of HOLOGRAMS OF planes on the day.

    2. The "eyewitnesses" saw a plane (which was probably a drone or another hologram) but NOT ONE eyewitness saw that "plane" HIT the Pentagon. A missile hit the Pentagon. The plane pieces on the lawn had been stored in boxes in the Pentagon, and when the missile hit the pentagon, these pieces went everywhere, making it look like a plane had hit the building.

    3. Proven nonsense. Calls couldn't be made from that altitude, and one person said "Hi Mom, it's Mr. (forget the name)". Who says that?

    4. Dead unfortunately.

    5. The damage to the pentagon is consistent with it being hit by a missile, not a plane.

  8. City fans = glory hunters.

    But they were shit for years and still mainitained a decent sized fan base. I seriously doubt they got their fans as a result of glory. But then again aren't all fan glory hunters? I don't watch Spurs in the hope we don't win any trophies (though we hardly ever do). I want glory, as do fans of all teams.

    Of course all fans want glory, but glory-hunters follow a team because of the glory that team will enjoy.

    The fact is that if you got to Manchester, the majority of fans there are United supporters who just follow their local club.

    City fans didn't have the spine to follow clubs like Wigan, Bolton, Stockport etc. so they hunt glory with Citeh.

    It's easy to pull in big crowds when there are just two clubs in your area too. There are 4 in the West Midlands and 10 in London.

    Oh yeah, and in the FA Cup match v Stoke last year they got 28,000. So much for their massive, loyal following.

  9. Considering my aunts friends were near one of the buses that was blown up on 7/7, I'm pretty sure it wasn't a hologram.

    I didn't say there were holograms on 7/7.

    Funny how the CCTV "wasn't working" on the bus that was blown up though. Oh, and that bus was just 1 of 2 diverted that day. Oh, and there's not one reliable eyewitness who places Hasib Hussain on that bus. Still, let's carry on regurgitating the Official Conspiracy Theory/Narrative/Big Lie.

  10. Everything is a conspiracy though isn't it, nothing ever actually happens. Alien cover up, no one on the moon, JFK assassination. Tupac ain't dead, Princess Dianna was murdered... 9/11 inside job.

    Not everything, but let's analyse some of the issues you have raised:

    The moon - the moon is a hollowed out planetoid, probably built by cosmic intelligence, that exists to disrupt the frequencies of planet Earth and as such, retard mankind's development. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceship_Moon_Theory http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&expIds=25657&xhr=t&q=moon+hollowed+out&cp=12&pf=p&sclient=psy&safe=off&aq=0&aqi=&aql=&oq=moon+hollowe&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=733b49addeb556

    Aliens - there are more stars in our galaxy alone than there are grains of sand on earth, yet you believe we are the only life form?

    JFK - JFK's head moves BACKWARD after the shooting, yet we are meant to believe that shots came from BEHIND him. Bonkers.

    Princess Di was murdered.

    9/11 was false flag terror, as was 7/7.

    It's not surprising that the same people believe the same conspiracies.

    Lmao WTF on the moon?

    I actually do believe there is other life form....but I don't believe they've come here, otherwise, we'd know about it because they'd keep coming here. Although you've probably watched Men in Black and thinks it works like this.

    JFK - http://www.assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/wound.html his first movement was actually forward motion.

    Princess DI - okay...sure, I suppose car crashes just never happen. Accidents on road kill over 1 million people a year. 999,999 are accidents. One happens to a celebrity and it's a murder.

    :lol: 9/11 and 7/7 false flag terror. The fact you believe no planes were involved says it all on 9/11. In fact any sort of evidence you do have is nothing compared to the evidence showing use of planes. Oh hey, forget facts, let's believe the last believable and the one that has no evidence or facts because that's obviously right! :lol:

    You should read up about the moon.

    His head moves forward BEFORE the bullet hits. Only once it has struck does his head move violently backward. JFK was killed because he tried to introduce interest-free money and as such, take power away from the central banks that control the world's money supply.

    But 999,999 aren't accidents are they? Some are deliberately made to happen. This is what happened in 1997.

    There's not a shred of evidence that planes hit the towers. Like I said, missiles wrapped in holograms.

  11. Everything is a conspiracy though isn't it, nothing ever actually happens. Alien cover up, no one on the moon, JFK assassination. Tupac ain't dead, Princess Dianna was murdered... 9/11 inside job.

    Not everything, but let's analyse some of the issues you have raised:

    The moon - the moon is a hollowed out planetoid, probably built by cosmic intelligence, that exists to disrupt the frequencies of planet Earth and as such, retard mankind's development. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceship_Moon_Theory http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&expIds=25657&xhr=t&q=moon+hollowed+out&cp=12&pf=p&sclient=psy&safe=off&aq=0&aqi=&aql=&oq=moon+hollowe&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=733b49addeb556

    Aliens - there are more stars in our galaxy alone than there are grains of sand on earth, yet you believe we are the only life form?

    JFK - JFK's head moves BACKWARD after the shooting, yet we are meant to believe that shots came from BEHIND him. Bonkers.

    Princess Di was murdered.

    9/11 was false flag terror, as was 7/7.

  12. They're planning to abolish private property. The austerity measures are going to make everybody so poor and they are going to keep the prices of the houses so high that it's inevitable.

×
×
  • Create New...
Â