ahamaad Posted February 8, 2007 Author Share Posted February 8, 2007 Who were the 8 who voted yes? After all the crap we had last time sha were in the PL, I wouldn't want them coming up, ever! remember the vadalism of VP? Hmm maybe they think of it as a football decision and getting Liam some more experience as it seems he is currently fourth choice! Some people can see beyond the sha obsessions that others have ;-) A loan with an immediate recall option should we need him due to injuries would suit us. BUT I would prefer he went somewhere else if he were to be loaned out to be honest. Have no issue with any club in the championship, except sha. Why should we help them win promotion? They didn't have to sell Upson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LancsVillan Posted February 8, 2007 Moderator Share Posted February 8, 2007 Loan rules prevent loans being for any less than a month Al. You can't therefore have an immediate recall clause. (until the first month has elapsed that is). well we're not playing a great deal in the next month are we, which given that Liam hasn't played for a while too is another reason why we could let him go out on loan. YES it's sha (capitals BOF!!! whatever next a blue scarf adorning your neck ;-) ) and like I said we should look for him to go elsewhere. I would rather he did that and kept up his readiness to play first team football than went playing pool / golf every afternoon. And I think he would learn a valuable lesson in playing in the Chumps league too. There but for the grace of god..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.I.C.O. Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 No way. We can't help SHA in any way. I'd slam the door firmly in their face! Just think - would they do it for us? NO CHANCE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaz Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 let him go on loan somewhere so he can get games every week. but God no not to them. let them sort their own crap out.he would never be looked upon as a villa lad again especialy if he helped get em up. Oh God no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted February 8, 2007 Moderator Share Posted February 8, 2007 I really cant see the point and it has nothing to do with sha Some European leagues have a winter break around this time of the year and it does them good, why cant we be the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sm Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Norwich are desparate for a centre half. But not the noses. Couldn't help looking at the wykipedia link. Noses won the Atari 6 a side cup apparently in the 80's. What the f**k is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x_villain Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 From F365's Mediawatch: From Bad To Worse For The Littlest Hobo We've all been round the neighbours' in a similar way, haven't we? "My phone's broken, can I use yours?" "Do you have a ladder I can borrow?" "I've sold my best player, can I borrow a defender?" What? Not the last one? Oh, right, that's just Steve Bruce, who after being told to do one by Martin O'Neill - "I'm trying to build a squad, not dismantle one" -when he tried to sign Liam Ridgewell on the last day of the transfer window is now going cap in hand and begging for him on loan. 'Bruce has targeted the England Under-21 star to replace Matthew Upson following his move to West Ham,' says the Daily Mirror, ignoring the twin facts that Ridgewell hasn't played for the Under-21s since, well, he turned 22, and that even Villa fans don't often refer to him as a 'star'. 'Villa do not want to sell but Bruce is hopeful a loan deal is possible', continues the Mirror, who clearly have no problem with Ridgewell committing career suicide by (a) being brilliant for Blues and becoming a hate figure at his own club or ( being rubbish for them and it being seen as deliberate sabotage. Actually, ( would be quite funny, wouldn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ender4 Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 don't mind if he plays for anyone, inc SHA. Bham City? who are they? no need to think of a non-premiership side as our biggest rivals. In 2 years time, our biggest rivals will be Man Utd, or Liverpool or Arsenal... ooo, thats a bit of a contraversial one, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villadude Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 No, I would not **** like them to have Ridgewell playing for them. To be honest, I hope they really struggle with defenders and end up getting nobody, then concede more goals and screw up their promotion chances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nrogers Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 We shouldn't be sending ANY defenders on loan and certainly not for SHA, unless in the contract they have to score an ow goal in every match!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanky Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 No Way. Apart from the fact that we need to keep Ridgewell and anything else I don't want to help them out of their defenders problem. unless in the contract they have to score an ow goal in every match!! There I might make the exception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts