BOF Posted July 24, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 24, 2013 N'Zogbia also in bomb squad then. It certainly looks that way, doesn't it?Surprising and slightly disappointing if I'm honest. He didn't do that badly last season. He must be on too high a wage to justify his place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Are these numbers official? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabby Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Bomb squad inc Nzogbia must be around the £40 mil outlay ..doubt we get more than £15mil for the lost of them now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Baker number2? Hmm would have much preferred matty to have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 24, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 24, 2013 Are these numbers official?It's the dropdown list if you go to the club store, buy a jersey and 'choose a player'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Baker number2? Hmm would have much preferred matty to have it. He must have a personal affinity with 34, because you'd think he'd have been first in line for an upgrade. Are these numbers official? It's the dropdown list if you go to the club store, buy a jersey and 'choose a player'. Hmm, just trying to cast my mind back to see if squad numbers are usually announced in a statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstonMartyn88 Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 They've been announced on the OS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 24, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 24, 2013 I'd say they usually are, but then I'd also be surprised if the official store was just guessing too *shrug* I dunno. It is the OS so it is kind of official in that sense. EDIT : It would appear that they now definitely are official Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Baker number2? Hmm would have much preferred matty to have it. He must have a personal affinity with 34, because you'd think he'd have been first in line for an upgrade. Yea i guess he must have but still, i prefer to see the first 11 in 1-11, of course none of it really matters really but still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbs Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) Bennett got number 3! Number 2 for Baker is odd considering 2 is primarily a right back. Does Lowton prefer 34? 35 to 42 are the "bomb squad"?? Edited July 24, 2013 by Webbs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 24, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 24, 2013 i prefer to see the first 11 in 1-11.I wonder how many times that happens to any Premier League team over the course of an entire season in this day and age. Rarely, I'd imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grogan_Avfc Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Isn't N'zogbia injured for a long time? Could be the reason why he has a 'high' number and not that were shifting him out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b23avfc Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Why am I on the kit builder page trying to come up with a witty name and number combo that I'm blatantly not planning to buy anyway (while waiting for something in the oven) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 i prefer to see the first 11 in 1-11. I wonder how many times that happens to any Premier League team over the course of an entire season in this day and age. Rarely, I'd imagine. Dont think ive ever seen it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 24, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 24, 2013 Okore taking #5; while perfectly explainable (Dunne leaving); is still intriguing, as you could have argued a current player might be first in line for that number. A portent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbs Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Would have preferred Weimann (10) to swap with Helenius (9) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 24, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 24, 2013 I think those numbers will probably reflect their positions more accurately when they are on the pitch Webbs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Okore taking #5; while perfectly explainable (Dunne leaving); is still intriguing, as you could have argued a current player might be first in line for that number. A portent? Well we have 4 centre backs in the first 11 numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 24, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 24, 2013 We do indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Okore taking #5; while perfectly explainable (Dunne leaving); is still intriguing, as you could have argued a current player might be first in line for that number. A portent? Im positive that lambert sees him as a starter its just about whos the best of the other 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts