Rodders Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 13 arrests. bent, racist clearings in the woods. I hope they video identify everyone and chuck them all in jail, assuming drowning them is out of the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ml1dch Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 4 minutes ago, Awol said: “I came to do a revolution and there was violence! My name and home address? Sure, it’s..” Art. Reckon I've now watched it two dozen times. It hasn't stopped being funny yet. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Salad Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 All these people storming the Capital are **** morons.Really only thing needs to be said on the subject.Your man lost,get over it. And seeing Trump's newest tweet he essentially fully agrees with them doing so,ridiculous. Arrest them all.If I find out somebody I know personally was a part of this, they can **** right off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannedfromHandV Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, StefanAVFC said: Surely his presidential immunity can only stretch so far, he’s celebrating the events, clear as day. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted January 6, 2021 Author Share Posted January 6, 2021 Trump still stirring the pot on Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 5 minutes ago, andyjsg said: To be honest I had no idea what he was talking about at the end, all very cryptic, was like watching a David Lynch movie and just as boring. I love that you think its ended. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villianusa Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 28 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: He took it at face value where it appears to show votes being deducted from Trump. Which is admittedly pretty alarming. But misrepresents the reality. I wasn't trying to shit on Villianusa. Just trying to show him why the chart he has presented is incorrect This is the video I was talking about what happened in Georgia on November 3rd HERE This was given at the 2nd Georgia state senate hearing into election fraud. This is the same data that the Secretary of State has certified the election. Again, votes should not go down, they should be accumulative. The state was told to hand over the machines for forensic viewing, but they are unwilling to do so. Why would you not want to be proved correct? Why are many states deleting election data that is a federal crime (supposed to be kept for 22 months)? I appreciate the discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidcow Posted January 6, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted January 6, 2021 This really does illustrate why such a long handover is a bad idea. He's spent 2 months stirring and stirring this up to get to this point. Give them a week and get them out before they can do too much damage. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Stevo985 Posted January 6, 2021 VT Supporter Popular Post Share Posted January 6, 2021 19 minutes ago, villianusa said: If all of what you say is true, but I disagree with it. Why would Trump lose over 100,000 votes and the same amount go to Biden? I mean I thought I explained it pretty well. But I’ll try again. Fundamentally because the data being used, or rather the data the author has reverse engineered, is absolutely and totally incorrect. That should be enough. But to try and explain it in detail. Let’s say Biden currently has exactly 1,000,000 votes and Trump has 1,000,000 votes. Exactly 50/50 A new batch of votes arrive. Let’s say it’s 50,000 votes. Because of the way the author is incorrectly extracting his data, he would assume this batch of votes was a 50/50 split (because he’s wrongly using the cumulative percentage split). So by his calculations it’s now 1,025,000 votes to Biden vs 1,025,000 votes for Trump. In reality, let’s say all 50,000 new votes were for Biden. The author has assumed half of those votes are Trump’s. But they’re not, in reality they’ve all gone to Biden. So in fact it’s 1,050,000 Biden vs 1,000,000 Trump and it’s now 51% vs 49% But the author doesn’t know this. All he can see is the top level data given on the NY Times website. This now says total votes of 2,050,000 and a split of 51%vs49% (rounded) So he does 49% of 2,050,000 and gets to 1,000,000 and thinks hang on! I’ve counted trump’s votes and he had 1,025,000 so he’s lost 25,000 votes!! And wait, Biden should only have 1,025,000 but he’s now got 1,050,000 so he’s gained 25,000 votes out of nowhere! He does that multiple times and you get the timeline set out in the original chart. Ive massively simplified the numbers so the percentages may not add up exactly, but you should hopefully get my point 10 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyjsg Posted January 6, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, chrisp65 said: I love that you think its ended. It will be picked up tomorrow or in another 5 years I’m sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Follyfoot Posted January 6, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted January 6, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leemond2008 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: I mean I thought I explained it pretty well. But I’ll try again. Fundamentally because the data being used, or rather the data the author has reverse engineered, is absolutely and totally incorrect. That should be enough. But to try and explain it in detail. Let’s say Biden currently has exactly 1,000,000 votes and Trump has 1,000,000 votes. Exactly 50/50 A new batch of votes arrive. Let’s say it’s 50,000 votes. Because of the way the author is incorrectly extracting his data, he would assume this batch of votes was a 50/50 split (because he’s wrongly using the cumulative percentage split). So by his calculations it’s now 1,025,000 votes to Biden vs 1,025,000 votes for Trump. In reality, let’s say all 50,000 new votes were for Biden. The author has assumed half of those votes are Trump’s. But they’re not, in reality they’ve all gone to Biden. So in fact it’s 1,050,000 Biden vs 1,000,000 Trump and it’s now 51% vs 49% But the author doesn’t know this. All he can see is the top level data given on the NY Times website. This now says total votes of 2,050,000 and a split of 51%vs49% (rounded) So he does 49% of 2,050,000 and gets to 1,000,000 and thinks hang on! I’ve counted trump’s votes and he had 1,025,000 so he’s lost 25,000 votes!! And wait, Biden should only have 1,025,000 but he’s now got 1,050,000 so he’s gained 25,000 votes out of nowhere! He does that multiple times and you get the timeline set out in the original chart. Ive massively simplified the numbers so the percentages may not add up exactly, but you should hopefully get my point I go full retard whenever I see numbers, you might as well have said that in German to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 The woman who was shot has been confirmed as dead now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Salad Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Nothing at all will be changed because of them doing this today.Complete and utter waste of time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fruitvilla Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: I mean I thought I explained it pretty well. But I’ll try again. ... Was this originally Shiva's interpretation? Edited January 6, 2021 by fruitvilla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyjsg Posted January 6, 2021 VT Supporter Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, Big Salad said: Nothing at all will be changed because of them doing this today.Complete and utter waste of time Was all just another episode of the Trump show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted January 6, 2021 Moderator Share Posted January 6, 2021 Can we just go back to the fact that it was VP Pence that deployed the DC National Guard, it seems to have been lost in all this. It's probably more important than anything I've seen happen since the building was cleared If it was Pence who gave the order, surely that requires Trump to have been relieved of office in some shape or form. Something has happened in the chain of command there. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyblade Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 15 minutes ago, Rodders said: 13 arrests. bent, racist clearings in the woods. I hope they video identify everyone and chuck them all in jail, assuming drowning them is out of the question. If there were ever a time for the internet to do its thing, this is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vive_La_Villa Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Big Salad said: Nothing at all will be changed because of them doing this today.Complete and utter waste of time Some of these phone make it look more like a fun day out rather than a protest. Probably why police didn’t intervene as it could then get nasty. Let them have their fun and go home. Then arrest the ones who got a little carried away. Edited January 6, 2021 by Vive_La_Villa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Awol Posted January 6, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted January 6, 2021 Good news is we’re no longer the last people to have attacked Washington. Another monkey off our backs. 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts