Jump to content

U.S. Politics


maqroll

Recommended Posts

On Bloomberg this am a really good point was made.

In an average sense; the US has tariffs of ~2.4% on global goods, while the rest of the world has tariffs of ~2.9% on US goods. This is therefore a fair issue that the US is raising (the method is in question), and the size of the difference is entirely tractable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meet the guys who tape Trump's papers back together

The president's unofficial 'filing system' involves tearing up documents into pieces, even when they're supposed to be preserved.

Quote

Solomon Lartey spent the first five months of the Trump administration working in the Old Executive Office Building, standing over a desk with scraps of paper spread out in front of him.

Lartey, who earned an annual salary of $65,969 as a records management analyst, was a career government official with close to 30 years under his belt. But he had never seen anything like this in any previous administration he had worked for. He had never had to tape the president’s papers back together again.

Armed with rolls of clear Scotch tape, Lartey and his colleagues would sift through large piles of shredded paper and put them back together, he said, “like a jigsaw puzzle.” Sometimes the papers would just be split down the middle, but other times they would be torn into pieces so small they looked like confetti.

It was a painstaking process that was the result of a clash between legal requirements to preserve White House records and President Donald Trump’s odd and enduring habit of ripping up papers when he’s done with them — what some people described as his unofficial “filing system.”

Under the Presidential Records Act, the White House must preserve all memos, letters, emails and papers that the president touches, sending them to the National Archives for safekeeping as historical records.

But White House aides realized early on that they were unable to stop Trump from ripping up paper after he was done with it and throwing it in the trash or on the floor, according to people familiar with the practice. Instead, they chose to clean it up for him, in order to make sure that the president wasn’t violating the law.

Staffers had the fragments of paper collected from the Oval Office as well as the private residence and send it over to records management across the street from the White House for Lartey and his colleagues to reassemble.

“We got Scotch tape, the clear kind,” Lartey recalled in an interview. “You found pieces and taped them back together and then you gave it back to the supervisor.” The restored papers would then be sent to the National Archives to be properly filed away.

Lartey said the papers he received included newspaper clips on which Trump had scribbled notes, or circled words; invitations; and letters from constituents or lawmakers on the Hill, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

“I had a letter from Schumer — he tore it up,” he said. “It was the craziest thing ever. He ripped papers into tiny pieces.”

Lartey did not work alone. He said his entire department was dedicated to the task of taping paper back together in the opening months of the Trump administration.

One of his colleagues, Reginald Young Jr., who worked as a senior records management analyst, said that during over two decades of government service, he had never been asked to do such a thing.

“We had to endure this under the Trump administration,” Young said. “I’m looking at my director, and saying, ‘Are you guys serious?’ We’re making more than $60,000 a year, we need to be doing far more important things than this. It felt like the lowest form of work you can take on without having to empty the trash cans.”

The White House did not comment on the president’s paper-ripping habit. According to Young and Lartey, staffers in the records department were still designated to the task of taping together the scraps as recently as this spring.

Lartey and Young described a system that stands in stark contrast to how records management was conducted under the Obama administration, which ran a structured paperwork process.

“All of the official paper that went into [the Oval Office], came back out again, to the best of my knowledge,” said Lisa Brown, who served as President Barack Obama’s first staff secretary. “I never remember the president throwing any official paper away.”

Brown described a regimented process for dealing with presidential records. She said all paper that was going to the president “would go in a folder with labels — one color for decision memos, for example, and another one for letters. Documents would go out to the president and then come back to the staff secretary’s office in the same folder for distribution and handling. It was a really structured process.”

Brown said Obama had an eye on preserving documents for history — even ones he was not technically required to send to the National Archives. “I remember the day he sent down to me his race speech from the campaign, handwritten,” she said. “All of the campaign material didn’t need to come into the White House or go to Archives.”

Trump, in contrast, does not have those preservationist instincts. One person familiar with how Trump operates in the Oval Office said he would rip up “anything that happened to be on his desk that he was done with.” Some aides advised him to stop, but the habit proved difficult to break.

Despite the president’s apparent disregard of the Presidential Records Act, sources said, aides around him have tried to take an overly inclusive approach to what would be considered a presidential record.

Anything that’s not purely personal — even just a note handed to an aide at a rally that was passed on to Trump — has been considered a record deemed worthy of being sent to records, where staffers could make sure the White House was being compliant with the law.

That team is now smaller, after many of the career officials were cleared out earlier this year.

Lartey, 54, and Young, 48, were career government officials who worked together in records management until this spring, when both were abruptly terminated from their jobs. Both are now unemployed and still full of questions about why they were stripped of their badges with no explanation and marched off of the White House grounds by Secret Service.

Irene Porada, the head of human resources who personally terminated both men, did not respond to an email requesting comment. A White House spokesman also did not respond to a request for comment about the terminations.

Young agreed to speak to POLITICO after this reporter contacted him to inquire about his termination. He then put this reporter in touch with Lartey, whose story of his dismissal — and the work he was asked to do during his final year of work under the Trump administration — corroborated Young’s account.

Both men originally agreed to speak to POLITICO for a story about why they believe they were unfairly terminated from jobs they expected to hold onto until they retired. Both said they were forced to sign resignation letters without being given any explanation for why they were being dismissed.

In the course of explaining what their work at the White House entailed, however, both described in detail the process of taping back together scraps of paper that the president had ripped up and thrown out. Both said they were happy to discuss the oddity of a job they began to view as a sort of punishment.

They did not, however, approach a reporter with the intent to leak embarrassing information about the president.

Lartey said he was fired at the end of the work day on March 23, with no warning. His top-secret security clearance was revoked, he said. Later, five boxes of his personal belongings were mailed to his home.

“I was stunned,” he said. “I asked them, ‘Why can’t you all tell me something?’ I had gotten comfortable. I was going to retire. I would never have thought I would have gotten fired.” He signed a pre-written resignation letter that stated he was leaving to pursue other opportunities. But he is still unemployed.

Young, who was terminated April 19, said he fought back and had his official status changed from “resigned” to “terminated.”

“I was coerced to sign a resignation letter at that time,” he said. “Then they escorted me to the garage and took my parking placard.”

He described the firing as traumatic and frustratingly Kafkaesque. “The only excuse that I’ve ever gotten from them,” he said, “was that you serve at the pleasure of the president.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/10/trump-papers-filing-system-635164

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

ntercom: What's going on down there? Come in!
Han Solo: Uh, everything is under control. Situation normal.
Intercom: What happened?
Han Solo: [flustered] Uh, had a slight weapons malfunction. But, uh, everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Intercom: We're sending a squad up.
Han Solo: Uh, uh, negative, negative. We had a reactor leak here now. Give us a few minutes to lock it down. Large leak... very dangerous.
Intercom: Who is this?? What's your operating number?
Han Solo: Uh... [shoots the intercom] Boring conversation anyway. Luke, we're gonna have company!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't help but feel that Trump has been massively played by Kim. Vague promises to 'work towards' denuclearization if countries follow suit? Seems unlikely. Yet Kim has been given a sheen of respectability and has probably managed to get sanctions lifted as a result. Whilst the Donald has had his ego stroked a bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“You’ve all got the papers though right? All the detail is in there”

”Oh, you didn’t get the papers? We’ll get right on to that but you will see that a lot of good work has been done”. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, in addition to my previous negative post, any lessening of NK's seclusion and anything that helps the citizens can only be a good thing really. If any of that transpires as a result of all this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, coda said:

Surely Don and Kim's meeting is a step in the right direction. Worth a try.

The act of meeting and talking with adversaries is pretty much always good, and should be applauded.

However, there are real questions about what was said/agreed to at the meeting that also need to be asked. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, HanoiVillan said:

The act of meeting and talking with adversaries is pretty much always good, and should be applauded.

However, there are real questions about what was said/agreed to at the meeting that also need to be asked. 

Trump: I have the highest approval ratings, you know, the best. You'd better not mess with me, chinky, or we'll nuke the shit out of you. 

Interpreter: Cordial greetings, o great one. Please, please, get rid of your missiles, and we'll give you lots of money. 

Kim: Screw that, you running dog lackey of the capitalist bourgeoisie. I am the Great Leader, and I submit to no-one. 

Interpreter: OK, big boy, it's a deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the agreement is no better (and may actually be less substantial) than previous ones. A vague commitment to work towards peace and denuclearisation of the Korean peninsular is something NK has been saying since 1992, while doing the opposite. It appears that there are no timetables, no commitments from NK to inspections etc, and given Trump has also subsequently said he will suspend joint military exercises with South Korea (although he didn't bother to let them know), it seems the 'great negotiator' has conceded more than he's gained. 

Still, its great optics for both of them (which is ultimately what they both crave), and its better than a twitter spat leading to nuclear war. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kim Jong Un is not going to get rid of the nukes. They're a guarantee against US aggression. They're going nowhere.

The summit achieves nothing for anyone but NK, who have been legitimised and got a propaganda victory, as well as straining the US/SK relationship by playing a fool like a fiddle.

Maybe you could count Trump getting to grandstand as a gain for someone else.

His response to a question about calling a murderous dictator very talented was hilarious. 'He is very talented. I didn't say he was nice!'.

Come on, do your magic cholesterol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my humble opinion,  whilst removing any of my pre -onceptions on the people involved.  Trump is,  in this world of optics and getting things done a **** genius.

To leave the G7 all crying and looking like what they are,  words removed,  then fly and do this is truly amazing.  The geezer is in his 70's ffs,  the barriers against this and still got it done.  

If Obaba had done the exact same,  totally differnet reaction I suspect on here and in the wider world.  

Will be a good entry in World History.

 

(I am not a fan of Trump but this is what it is)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Amsterdam_Neil_D said:

In my humble opinion,  whilst removing any of my pre -onceptions on the people involved.  Trump is,  in this world of optics and getting things done a **** genius.

To leave the G7 all crying and looking like what they are,  words removed,  then fly and do this is truly amazing.  The geezer is in his 70's ffs,  the barriers against this and still got it done.  

If Obaba had done the exact same,  totally differnet reaction I suspect on here and in the wider world.  

Will be a good entry in World History.

 

(I am not a fan of Trump but this is what it is)

You OK hun? 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Amsterdam_Neil_D said:

In my humble opinion,  whilst removing any of my pre -onceptions on the people involved.  Trump is,  in this world of optics and getting things done a **** genius.

To leave the G7 all crying and looking like what they are,  words removed,  then fly and do this is truly amazing.  The geezer is in his 70's ffs,  the barriers against this and still got it done.  

If Obaba had done the exact same,  totally differnet reaction I suspect on here and in the wider world.  

Will be a good entry in World History.

 

(I am not a fan of Trump but this is what it is)

Errr...

Trump left the G7 having agreed to sign a statement with all the others in contrast to any expectations before the meeting. You can paint this as he agreed or that the other nations convinced him to agree. Then, in a rookie mistake by the Canadian pm, he started his for the home audience press conference routine **before** the statement was released. This was amateur hour from Trudeau, and a harsh lesson in how politics work.

The broader point about Trump and then Obama is spot on. So much of what is being said about Trump by the "centrists"/"left" is an exact mirror of republican talking points when Obama went to Cuba. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â