troon_villan Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 I'd rather we just ban children from the site and keep the naughty pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockStockVilla Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Well Kate Upton all day. I am decent mates with a boy who happens to be the little brother of the Detroit Tigers pitcher Justin Verlander. It so happens that Justin is currently dating Kate Upton....so uhh yeaaa, next time I am back in the states, I know who I am giving a call to! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meath_Villan Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Anna Farris .....Yay or Nay ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lp_villa830 Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Who is Kate Upton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockStockVilla Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Who is Kate Upton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted July 15, 2012 Moderator Share Posted July 15, 2012 If this turns into a Lovely Ladies thread it's getting locked. There are two reasons why we don't allow it - firstly youngsters, as we can't filter content for age groups; and secondly on-site advertisers who don't want to be associated with grot, as most of you choose to use VT for free we're dependent on them to keep us running. Naughty pics go up, VT goes down. Simple. Keep it in mind. Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brommy Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 I can understand the stance of this site regarding 'naughty pics'. Can anyone explain why the restriction doesn't include pictures of male genitalia? A half glimpse of a nipple = A full frontal photograph including a penis and testicles = It seems strange so I'd genuinely be interested in why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanBalaban Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 LP Villa, surely that's a pic of Anna Faris, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingram85 Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 I can understand the stance of this site regarding 'naughty pics'. Can anyone explain why the restriction doesn't include pictures of male genitalia? A half glimpse of a nipple = A full frontal photograph including a penis and testicles = It seems strange so I'd genuinely be interested in why. This to be honest, seems a bit strange. I can't look at a lady's nutrient givers but Warren Bartons cock and testicles is ok? Not too mention that pitch invader with his bits on show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lp_villa830 Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 LP Villa, surely that's a pic of Anna Faris, right? Yes it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted July 15, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted July 15, 2012 I would destroy Kate Upton. DESTROY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted July 15, 2012 Moderator Share Posted July 15, 2012 I can understand the stance of this site regarding 'naughty pics'. Can anyone explain why the restriction doesn't include pictures of male genitalia? A half glimpse of a nipple = A full frontal photograph including a penis and testicles = It seems strange so I'd genuinely be interested in why. This to be honest, seems a bit strange. I can't look at a lady's nutrient givers but Warren Bartons cock and testicles is ok? Not too mention that pitch invader with his bits on show. All about context really. Warren Barton isn't posing in an erotic manner so it doesn't constitute a sexual image. I can delete it if anyone's offended by it though. Just drop me a PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brommy Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 I can understand the stance of this site regarding 'naughty pics'. Can anyone explain why the restriction doesn't include pictures of male genitalia? A half glimpse of a nipple = A full frontal photograph including a penis and testicles = It seems strange so I'd genuinely be interested in why. This to be honest, seems a bit strange. I can't look at a lady's nutrient givers but Warren Bartons cock and testicles is ok? Not too mention that pitch invader with his bits on show. All about context really. Warren Barton isn't posing in an erotic manner so it doesn't constitute a sexual image. I can delete it if anyone's offended by it though. Just drop me a PM. I don't think anyone is offended; merely seeking fair balance. There are plenty of images of naked women which many would deem NOT erotic, so would they be permitted on VT? Conversely, a few may deem any sight of cock and balls to be erotic. Eroticism and context is extremely subjective and some of the censorship appears somewhat imbalanced on occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villarule123 Posted July 15, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted July 15, 2012 Why not have a donaters forum where only donaters can post stuff and anything they like? Will also raise cash for the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Why not have a donaters forum where only donaters can post stuff and anything they like?There is one. It's a great laugh. 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumerican Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Why not have a donaters forum where only donaters can post stuff and anything they like?There is one. It's a great laugh. 8) Link ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Why not have a donaters forum where only donaters can post stuff and anything they like?There is one. It's a great laugh. 8) Link ? Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted July 15, 2012 Moderator Share Posted July 15, 2012 I don't think anyone is offended; merely seeking fair balance. There are plenty of images of naked women which many would deem NOT erotic, so would they be permitted on VT? Conversely, a few may deem any sight of cock and balls to be erotic. Eroticism and context is extremely subjective and some of the censorship appears somewhat imbalanced on occasions. Similarly there are many websites where one can see images of women, either erotic or otherwise, without VT needing to be one of them. If Limpid was generating enough money to keep VTs servers running without the need for advertising income he may choose to relax his stance. Or he may not. It's his website. Everyone chuck him a tenner and lets see what happens... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa_chemist Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 You tellin' me there's pictures of women on the Internet? Link?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts