villafan306 Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Bent is younger and already has a better goal to games ratio. So for me it would be Bent out of those two if we had the choice. Tbh if we were going to spend £11m on Defoe then I can't see why we can't throw that same amount into the hat for Bent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pelle Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 What about this: Moore/Gabby-Bent-Dica? Seems good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slovenian Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Dica talk is getting serious. skysports: The 26-year-old is hoping to take advantage of Romania's new EU status which will allow any player from that country to play in England without the need of a work-permit. Dica is the star of the Steaua Bucharest side which has lifted the Romanian title for the last two seasons. eurosport: The new Romanian Player of the Year scored four goals in the UEFA Champions League for Steaua and, at 26, is ripe for a big-money transfer. Lille, Bordeaux, Aston Villa, Portsmouth, Fiorentina, Rangers and AEK Athens are all said to be watching the situation with interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted January 5, 2007 Moderator Share Posted January 5, 2007 Gabby-Bent-Dica Ouch, sounds sore to me, I'd get that checked Gabby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straggler Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Bent is younger and already has a better goal to games ratio. So for me it would be Bent out of those two if we had the choice. Tbh if we were going to spend £11m on Defoe then I can't see why we can't throw that same amount into the hat for Bent. This is my feeling too. Goals are the money. Defoe is flash and gets some goals, but Bent gets more and that is what counts. I would still welcome Defoe though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grant(aka_eddy) Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Very very tough call between Defoe or Bent. I have an inclination to choose Defoe though i'm not sure why. Common sense says that Bent is the better option due to his age and ability to operate as a loan striker if needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avfc89 Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 We won't get them. we will get someone like John Hartson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Posted January 5, 2007 VT Supporter Share Posted January 5, 2007 Bent is younger and already has a better goal to games ratio. So for me it would be Bent out of those two if we had the choice. Tbh if we were going to spend £11m on Defoe then I can't see why we can't throw that same amount into the hat for Bent. This is my feeling too. Goals are the money. Defoe is flash and gets some goals, but Bent gets more and that is what counts. I would still welcome Defoe though. Id have to agree with you here. Bent can score the dirty goals too whereas Defoe has to beat 7 players. A striker is there to score goals not scare defenders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted January 5, 2007 Moderator Share Posted January 5, 2007 We won't get them. we will get someone like John Hartson. That's the spirit :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pike-star Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Yes, but that doesn't mean they will get him. Whatever happens I think we will get either Bent or Defoe. My preference is Bent but Defoe is not a bad consollation prize! hahaha... defoe isnt going anywhere!!!! :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahamaad Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Bent offers the added aerial threat. Defoe is a little rat. Bent for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeMoore Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 bent can play as a lone striker, can hold the ball up well and win headers which defoe really can't do. I'm a fan of defoe but i have to say bent would be the better player to sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pelle Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Gabby-Bent-Dica Ouch, sounds sore to me, I'd get that checked Gabby Why on earth did I not see that coming? Wouldn't fancy it myself now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pike-star Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 patience! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocafella Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Bent would be ace, 8/10, 10 being Henry. Defoe would be a 7. Both = 10:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grievemeister Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Why not have both! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avfc89 Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 We won't get them. we will get someone like John Hartson. That's the spirit :? hahahahahah. I really hope we get Bent/Defoe we could swap Baros Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villab0y Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Have we signed Defoe yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Posted January 5, 2007 VT Supporter Share Posted January 5, 2007 Why not have both! IMO I doubt he would go for both even if offered the chance as they would be too similar in their style of play. He may well be in for another striker but of the target man variety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avfc89 Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Why not have both! IMO I doubt he would go for both even if offered the chance as they would be too similar in their style of play. He may well be in for another striker but of the target man variety.Yes Hartson lol hoof it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts