AntrimBlack Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Got in several good crosses. Perhaps bring him on as sub a few times to see how he does, but not to start in stead of Weimann. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Some people can see into the future evidently, i'd prefer him to be given the chance and show us whether hes good or shit rather than assuming. Its not assumption. Its opinions based on the chance you claim he hasn't had. Oh right you mean 2-3(?) games since lambert came inbetween 2 long term injuries? My bad. He's 24 years old and has made plenty of first team appearances in the premier league. No idea why you want to pretend he's some young unknown coming through the ranks. Well i haven't said hes a youngster coming through the ranks so dont suggest stuff to suit your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSV Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 (edited) First game in ages. Deserves a run of games at leastWhy? Why does he deserve a run of games over other players?He doesn't. However Tonev and Wiemann have been shit. We have seen albrighton play well then have second season syndrome like benteke is currently experiencing. Then he got some bad injuries. Under Lambert who seems to rate him i think he will thrive. Whats the harm? Cant be Any worse than tonev. At least he's a local lad that is a fan and will give it his all Edited December 3, 2013 by KSV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AntrimBlack Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Weimann certainly gives his all, and in my opinion is much more effective than Albrighton. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Some people can see into the future evidently, i'd prefer him to be given the chance and show us whether hes good or shit rather than assuming.Its not assumption. Its opinions based on the chance you claim he hasn't had.Oh right you mean 2-3(?) games since lambert came inbetween 2 long term injuries? My bad. He's 24 years old and has made plenty of first team appearances in the premier league. No idea why you want to pretend he's some young unknown coming through the ranks. Well i haven't said hes a youngster coming through the ranks so dont suggest stuff to suit your argument. Then why the post about 2-3 games when quite clearly he's made a lot of first team appearances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 First game in ages. Deserves a run of games at leastWhy? Why does he deserve a run of games over other players?He doesn't. However Tonev and Wiemann have been shit. We have seen albrighton play well then have second season syndrome like benteke is currently experiencing. Then he got some bad injuries. Under Lambert who seems to rate him i think he will thrive. Whats the harm? Cant be Any worse than tonev. At least he's a local lad that is a fan and will give it his all They both have more potential than albrighton and tonev had cost a few million pounds. Is much rather they have first team opportunities than Albright on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Some people can see into the future evidently, i'd prefer him to be given the chance and show us whether hes good or shit rather than assuming. Its not assumption. Its opinions based on the chance you claim he hasn't had. Oh right you mean 2-3(?) games since lambert came inbetween 2 long term injuries? My bad. He's 24 years old and has made plenty of first team appearances in the premier league. No idea why you want to pretend he's some young unknown coming through the ranks. Well i haven't said hes a youngster coming through the ranks so dont suggest stuff to suit your argument. Then why the post about 2-3 games when quite clearly he's made a lot of first team appearances. Because as ive already said since lambert came 1 and a half seasons ago hes had 2 long term injuries and 2-3 appearances, how many ways can i reword this for you to get the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Some people can see into the future evidently, i'd prefer him to be given the chance and show us whether hes good or shit rather than assuming.Its not assumption. Its opinions based on the chance you claim he hasn't had.Oh right you mean 2-3(?) games since lambert came inbetween 2 long term injuries? My bad.He's 24 years old and has made plenty of first team appearances in the premier league. No idea why you want to pretend he's some young unknown coming through the ranks.Well i haven't said hes a youngster coming through the ranks so dont suggest stuff to suit your argument. Then why the post about 2-3 games when quite clearly he's made a lot of first team appearances. Because as ive already said since lambert came 1 and a half seasons ago hes had 2 long term injuries and 2-3 appearances, how many ways can i reword this for you to get the point? So only games under Lambert count? I said people formed an opinion based on what they've seen from him and you came back with your genius sarcastic response about 2-3 games. Brilliant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie09 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 I don't dislike Albrighton but he's a limited footballer. I'd much rather push Bacuna forward and play Lowton at right back if we want better delivery to the forwards. If we want to progress as a team we need better players than Albrighton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poitier Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 In approximately 40 starts and 20 sub appearances for Villa he has scored 9 goals and 9 assists. That proves that he is crap/good depending on what you already thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.Bear Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Never going to make it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Weimann certainly gives his all, and in my opinion is much more effective than Albrighton. The security of signing a new contract has taken the edge off Weimann's performance but the main problem is that we really haven't got anyone in the squad who can put a decent cross in and if Lambert is going to revert to playing both Benteke and Kozak up front as a 'Plan B' then he needs to purchase a decent wide man who can do this. I am however all for giving Albrighton one last chance to prove that he can provide a supply line but if he doesn't improve by January then for the above stated reasons we'll need to purchase someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Some people can see into the future evidently, i'd prefer him to be given the chance and show us whether hes good or shit rather than assuming. Its not assumption. Its opinions based on the chance you claim he hasn't had. Oh right you mean 2-3(?) games since lambert came inbetween 2 long term injuries? My bad. He's 24 years old and has made plenty of first team appearances in the premier league. No idea why you want to pretend he's some young unknown coming through the ranks. Well i haven't said hes a youngster coming through the ranks so dont suggest stuff to suit your argument. Then why the post about 2-3 games when quite clearly he's made a lot of first team appearances. Because as ive already said since lambert came 1 and a half seasons ago hes had 2 long term injuries and 2-3 appearances, how many ways can i reword this for you to get the point? So only games under Lambert count? I said people formed an opinion based on what they've seen from him and you came back with your genius sarcastic response about 2-3 games. Brilliant. Right so we'll ignore the good season under houllier and then just judge him on the 2 injury riddled seasons then, ok. Brilliant indeed, deary me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Some people can see into the future evidently, i'd prefer him to be given the chance and show us whether hes good or shit rather than assuming.Its not assumption. Its opinions based on the chance you claim he hasn't had.Oh right you mean 2-3(?) games since lambert came inbetween 2 long term injuries? My bad.He's 24 years old and has made plenty of first team appearances in the premier league. No idea why you want to pretend he's some young unknown coming through the ranks.Well i haven't said hes a youngster coming through the ranks so dont suggest stuff to suit your argument.Then why the post about 2-3 games when quite clearly he's made a lot of first team appearances.Because as ive already said since lambert came 1 and a half seasons ago hes had 2 long term injuries and 2-3 appearances, how many ways can i reword this for you to get the point? So only games under Lambert count? I said people formed an opinion based on what they've seen from him and you came back with your genius sarcastic response about 2-3 games. Brilliant. Right so we'll ignore the good season under houllier and then just judge him on the 2 injury riddled seasons then, ok. Brilliant indeed, deary me. By good season you mean 4 months? He was found out pretty quickly that year. He's made around 60 first team appearances. You don't think that's enough for people to form an opinion on the player he is and the player he might become? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 I've seen enough of his good side to know he is capable at this level without a doubt and the only way we'll find out if will cut it is if hes given a chance rather than just giving up on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 I've seen enough of his good side to know he is capable at this level without a doubt and the only way we'll find out if will cut it is if hes given a chance rather than just giving up on him. So you've seen enough to know but anyone who disagrees with you is just making an assumption. That's nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Please just stop talking utter shit and twisting words to suit your benefit, thats not what i said and you know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Some people can see into the future evidently, i'd prefer him to be given the chance and show us whether hes good or shit rather than assuming. I've seen enough of his good side to know he is capable at this level without a doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffy Biro Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 You just cannot be that thick seriously, were done here before i go and smash my face against a wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_John_10 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 You just cannot be that thick seriously, were done here before i go and smash my face against a wall. Its clear to see what you've wrote. Getting angry and not being able to explain it doesn't change it. Count to 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts