Dodgyknees Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 At half time he said it was not a penalty for Chelsea, at full time he said it was a penalty. Can you look back and see if I am right? No wonder he was sacked, he probably couldn't remember which wife Terry was sleeping with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wedge Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Most blatant display of bias I have ever seen in a pundit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanky Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 He said it was debatable at half time I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacketspuds Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 He looks gutted that Chelsea didn't win the game. Diddums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevMur Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 He doesn't talk like a guy who was sacked by Chelski a few weeks ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kieranavfc Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 tough sh*t you stupid bald tosser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodgyknees Posted January 2, 2011 Author Share Posted January 2, 2011 He said it was debatable at half time I think. Confirmation would be great. Even still, he went from debatable to a definite pen, tosser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djdabush Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 He said it was a penalty at both half and full time, definitely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 With Wilkins, Lampard's cousin and Coventry monkey boy Keys in the studio you aren't going to get much Villa love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danceoftheshamen Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Yeah he said it was "debatable in fact possibly not a pen" at half time then had completely altered his opinion at the end saying it was "a deffo pen".....It was clear however from the replays that Collins was backed into by the Chelsea player who then threw himself on the floor in a ridiculous dive motion about a second after the challenge had been commited... This was pointed out to Wilkins who couldn't argue with it but said it was a Penalty "Because it was a silly challenge by Collins as it was giving Malouda an easy option to go down" Definately not a penalty for me & every one else except Wilkins & the biased official of course who had a severe case of top4itis as was proven by the "9 fouls each at half time but 1 Chelsea booking to Villa's 6 statistic! Again proof of top 4 bias in abundance in this match just as it was in the Man city game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 hahahaha, **** off Uncle Fester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shillzz Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Harsh I think. If anything, Sky need a slap in the face for bringing someone in who is always going to be undoubtedly biased towards Chelsea. You cant really fault a guy for showing his true colours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodgyknees Posted January 2, 2011 Author Share Posted January 2, 2011 Yeah he said it was "debatable in fact possibly not a pen" at half time then had completely altered his opinion at the end saying it was "a deffo pen".....It was clear however from the replays that Collins was backed into by the Chelsea player who then threw himself on the floor in a ridiculous dive motion about a second after the challenge had been commited... This was pointed out to Wilkins who couldn't argue with it but said it was a Penalty "Because it was a silly challenge by Collins as it was giving Malouda an easy option to go down" Definately not a penalty for me & every one else except Wilkins & the biased official of course who had a severe case of top4itis as was proven by the "9 fouls each at half time but 1 Chelsea booking to Villa's 6 statistic! Again proof of top 4 bias in abundance in this match just as it was in the Man city game! as I thought, what a tit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrenm Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 At HT and FT he stated it was definitely a penalty, no question. Keys and Redknapp tried to make him see sense but he wouldn't accept it. Even Keys was laughing at Wilkins and kept saying "but he took 2 steps before going down..". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djdabush Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 At HT and FT he stated it was definitely a penalty, no question. Keys and Redknapp tried to make him see sense but he wouldn't accept it. Even Keys was laughing at Wilkins and kept saying "but he took 2 steps before going down..". Indeed. Keys even began the HT interval by making reference to the fact that Wilkins and Redknapp were in disagreement over the decision and to be fair plenty of villa fans agreed with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mottaloo Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 With Wilkins, Lampard's cousin and Coventry monkey boy Keys in the studio you aren't going to get much Villa love. This. Deffo not a neutral panel. Squeaky Redknobb even mentioned "me Dad" - again after the game Cock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AValon Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Wilkins is a boring git anyway. Soon as I saw him on the box I turned the sound off till the game started! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy_Evergo Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Sorry that I missed it. I assume that he thought Chelsea were 'triffic' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villadude Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 You think he'd be a bit pissed with Chelsk after the way he's been treated by them. Ah well, **** him and them anyway 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted January 2, 2011 Moderator Share Posted January 2, 2011 Lampard's cousin Really, they are brothers, I'm convinced Frank Senior jumped into the wrong bed on a family holiday. Or maybe candleface paid his Bro-in-law to shag his wife as he has an erectile problem, his cock melts with friction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts