Jump to content

Jack Grealish


kevangrealish
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Eastie said:

Found the percy article from jacks sept contract new deal , couldn’t post whole article as file too big , the purslow no clauses interview was from before this deal was done 

A39D86E7-E2FC-401D-AD40-BCF7BC9D934A.jpeg

If there is a release clause, I imagine it'd be way higher than the touted 70-100m that the various papers can't seem to agree on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Keyblade said:

If there is a release clause, I imagine it'd be way higher than the touted 70-100m that the various papers can't seem to agree on. 

Certainly wouldn’t expect it to be under £100m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Eastie said:

Certainly wouldn’t expect it to be under £100m

I imagine it'd be in the 130-150 range otherwise it doesn't make sense for it to exist. We could have sold him for 100 before he signed the contract. I'm sure they'd have predicted he'd get into the England squad within the year too which would increase his value. I don't expect the shrewd businessmen leading our club to mess up such a huge part of their plan and add a relatively low release clause in the contract of their talisman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Fun Factory said:

I do not see why the club would have put in a release clause last year. That would be mad.

Probably only way jack would agree a new 5 year deal - perfectly understandable on his side and would  at least give the club a substantial fee  hopefully 

Edited by Eastie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


40 minutes ago, MadridVilla said:

If there is a buyout clause they may still want to bid below it to test Villa's resolve. Villa can of course reject it, but a bid of £90m they might accept if that's City's final offer and Jack wants out

could be like the Suarez buyout clause ,that never existed ,  but was rumoured to be £40m 

 Arsenal basically bid £1 over it to see if it did exist or not ..and found out , that indeed there was no such clause 

maybe Citeh are doing something similar ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Keyblade said:

I imagine it'd be in the 130-150 range otherwise it doesn't make sense for it to exist. We could have sold him for 100 before he signed the contract. I'm sure they'd have predicted he'd get into the England squad within the year too which would increase his value. I don't expect the shrewd businessmen leading our club to mess up such a huge part of their plan and add a relatively low release clause in the contract of their talisman.

His value now is higher than year ago but £100m a year ago would have been more likely I’d think 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tomaszk said:

We will not be accepting any bid under the buyout, should it exist.

It will stitch us up if they wait until 3 days before the season starts and do it then.

So that's what I'd do if I was City.

Robinho deal says hi!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tomaszk said:

We will not be accepting any bid under the buyout, should it exist.

It will stitch us up if they wait until 3 days before the season starts and do it then.

So that's what I'd do if I was City.

Agreed, Robinho deal says hi!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, stewiek2 said:

Robinho deal says hi!

One would hope that we’d have a certain date it had to be activated by if so , obviously not letting it go to deadline day 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • VT Supporter
2 minutes ago, Eastie said:

One would hope that we’d have a certain date it had to be activated by if so , obviously not letting it go to deadline day 

need this done one way or the other before the window slams shut 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it’s close to being completed, I wonder if Grealish will return to training at all…

Hopefully we’ll see images of him at bodymoor on Monday when he’s due back along with Mings and Martinez.

I’m still in the ‘he’s staying’ camp as I believe we don’t want to sell and we’re improving the squad around Jack.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


18 minutes ago, Eastie said:

Probably only way jack would agree a new 5 year deal - perfectly understandable on his side and would  at least give the club a substantial fee  hopefully 

Still all guess work if there is.  In that Sept article still not confirmation either. 

Either the release clause is well over 100m like 120m or more or there isn’t one otherwise we’d know about it and City would be activating it.  Given all the numbers floating around the release clause won’t be 100m, if there is one at all.

I don’t think there is one, we’d know about it rather than just wild speculation.  These things aren’t kept secret long and it’s been too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, theboyangel said:

If it’s close to being completed, I wonder if Grealish will return to training at all…

Hopefully we’ll see images of him at bodymoor on Monday when he’s due back along with Mings and Martinez.

I’m still in the ‘he’s staying’ camp as I believe we don’t want to sell and we’re improving the squad around Jack.

It will be very interesting to see if he does return to bodymoor on Monday or not. If he doesn’t, it pretty much confirms our worst fears. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of use Terms of Use, Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Â