Zatman Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 I would say any clause was probably a relegation clause since we nearly went down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MotoMkali Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 (edited) 31 minutes ago, M_Afro said: It was reported at the time that his contract did include a buy out clause. It included a relegation clause. That's it. Purslow has said multiple times none of our players have buyout clauses. Edited June 21, 2021 by MotoMkali 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdman Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 (edited) 29 minutes ago, bose said: Or possibly he wouldn't have signed a new contract last year if there was no clause and then left? I'm not sure there is a buyout clause because should the situation arise that Jack feels its time to move on its in both his and the clubs interest to get a deal done. The relationship Jack has with Villa I just don't think it would be necessary to have one. There may be some other contractual stipulation though that caters for such a situation. Perhaps I'm just being too rosy though! Edited June 21, 2021 by birdman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aston_Villan4 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 The Athletic trying to uncover the truth:https://www.givemesport.com/1710099-jack-grealish-report-unpicks-england-stars-complicated-relationship-with-southgate “..Well, a recent report from The Athletic has aimed to shed light on the situation ahead of the final Group D game against the Czech Republic at Wembley. The report lists five key points that are influencing the relationship between Southgate and Grealish. Firstly, the England manager is a fan of Grealish but doesn't totally trust him to do what he wants on the pitch. Rather pertinently, both have differing ideas on Grealish's best position while the player himself suspects his party-boy image could be counting against him. It's also been reported that Grealish had a poor relationship with England U21 manager Aidy Boothroyd, who was a close ally of Southgate's during their time together in the England setup. The final reason concerns Southgate's overall handling of the squad, with certain players believing he has favourites in the dressing room - including Jordan Henderson, Mount and Sterling. That is not to say that the relationship between the pair is strained "Any talk that Gareth has an issue with Jack, or doesn’t like him as a person, couldn’t be further from the truth,” said a source close to the squad. The disagreements over his best position and his image, which does have undertones of a bygone era that Southgate has made clear strides to eradicate, could well be counting against Grealish as he bids to establish himself in the XI..” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rodders0223 Posted June 21, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted June 21, 2021 Imagine having the future of your country and the current crop managed by Southgate and Boothroyd. Two absolute suck arses whose football could put a glass eye to sleep. End me now. There is no hope. You know I sometimes look at Jack, taking the ball under pressure from 3 men, striding away, playing pin point through balls, perfectly weighted, between centre and fullbacks, I look at him and I think - I wish you were more like Kyle Walker. Pace and Power lad. Get at em. Get em turned. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdman Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 29 minutes ago, Aston_Villan4 said: The Athletic trying to uncover the truth:https://www.givemesport.com/1710099-jack-grealish-report-unpicks-england-stars-complicated-relationship-with-southgate “..Well, a recent report from The Athletic has aimed to shed light on the situation ahead of the final Group D game against the Czech Republic at Wembley. The report lists five key points that are influencing the relationship between Southgate and Grealish. Firstly, the England manager is a fan of Grealish but doesn't totally trust him to do what he wants on the pitch. Rather pertinently, both have differing ideas on Grealish's best position while the player himself suspects his party-boy image could be counting against him. It's also been reported that Grealish had a poor relationship with England U21 manager Aidy Boothroyd, who was a close ally of Southgate's during their time together in the England setup. The final reason concerns Southgate's overall handling of the squad, with certain players believing he has favourites in the dressing room - including Jordan Henderson, Mount and Sterling. That is not to say that the relationship between the pair is strained "Any talk that Gareth has an issue with Jack, or doesn’t like him as a person, couldn’t be further from the truth,” said a source close to the squad. The disagreements over his best position and his image, which does have undertones of a bygone era that Southgate has made clear strides to eradicate, could well be counting against Grealish as he bids to establish himself in the XI..” Many of us have speculated on these same reasons but the fact is if Southgate is still holding onto these things as an excuse not to play him hes a very weak manager indeed. We all know he's stubborn but fine line between that and outright stupidity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick76 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 (edited) Being reported that Man City have submitted a 100m bid for Kane. If that's true then that has to definitely mean Jack is staying at Villa. No way would they buy two 100m players in a summer, not even Man City would do that. https://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre Edited June 21, 2021 by nick76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulMcGrath_5 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 Just now, nick76 said: Being reported that Man City have submitted a 100m bid for Kane. If that's true then that has to definitely mean Jack is staying at Villa. No way would they buy two 100m players in a summer, not even Man City would do that. This crossed my mind too. Striker far more of a priority for them than a LW/CAM. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, nick76 said: Being reported that Man City have submitted a 100m bid for Kane. If that's true then that has to definitely mean Jack is staying at Villa. No way would they buy two 100m players in a summer, not even Man City would do that. Plus if they do get Kane it's gonna cost more than that. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulberto21 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 21 minutes ago, nick76 said: Being reported that Man City have submitted a 100m bid for Kane. If that's true then that has to definitely mean Jack is staying at Villa. No way would they buy two 100m players in a summer, not even Man City would do that. https://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre Breaking news Arsenal fans believe Kane will join them along with Jack. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick76 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 7 minutes ago, Sulberto21 said: Breaking news Arsenal fans believe Kane will join them along with Jack. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulberto21 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 8 minutes ago, nick76 said: Well I stand corrected! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icouldtelltheworld Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 Citeh bidding £100m for Kane is almost certainly good news for us, but another strong season from Jack and I reckon he'll be Pep's number one target next year. Never really felt worried that he'd be off this summer - but I wouldn't be surprised if he goes for silly money next year. As others have said, a striker is a much more pressing concern for them at the moment than another attacking mid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 I'd say if City want Jack they need to be showing interest this summer with a view to bidding for him next summer. I can't see our valuation of him changing much between this summer and next. He's a 100m+ player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barry'sboots Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 6 minutes ago, icouldtelltheworld said: Citeh bidding £100m for Kane is almost certainly good news for us, but another strong season from Jack and I reckon he'll be Pep's number one target next year. Never really felt worried that he'd be off this summer - but I wouldn't be surprised if he goes for silly money next year. As others have said, a striker is a much more pressing concern for them at the moment than another attacking mid Key thing for us is to show progress. If we can get into the European spots and then re-invest again next summer, I think Jack would probably want to stay. I imagine he would be very keen to lead the Villa out in Europe? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedClaretAndBlue Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 This season really could be epic. Our squad is shaping up to be primed for a high finish. Im so happy how quickly we’ve built this squad. Really likable blokes you can get behind, every one of them. Jack please stay fit and lead this group to the promised land 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwi1890 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 1 hour ago, PaulMcGrath_5 said: This crossed my mind too. Striker far more of a priority for them than a LW/CAM. Given the way Kane plays now he would certainly suit them in that false 9 role. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MotoMkali Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 1 hour ago, nick76 said: Being reported that Man City have submitted a 100m bid for Kane. If that's true then that has to definitely mean Jack is staying at Villa. No way would they buy two 100m players in a summer, not even Man City would do that. https://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre Spurs aren't selling and have no reason to sell. Kane had 4 years left. Also no way city actually bid for Kane. He doesn't fit their football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdman Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 England midfield update: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick76 Posted June 21, 2021 Share Posted June 21, 2021 41 minutes ago, MotoMkali said: Spurs aren't selling and have no reason to sell. Kane had 4 years left. Also no way city actually bid for Kane. He doesn't fit their football. Are you being serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts