Marka Ragnos Posted October 4, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted October 4, 2022 A win for the truth, good manners, and the freedom to tell the truth on social media -- if it's actually the truth, that is. Quote Wagatha Christie trial: Rebekah Vardy ordered to pay $1.7m towards Coleen Rooney's legal costs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 $1.7m in legal cost What an absolute colossal waste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Follyfoot Posted October 4, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted October 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, villa4europe said: $1.7m in legal cost What an absolute colossal waste Got to be honest I was gripped from the start. Justice was done. Thank God we have a legal system that allows the downtrodden to get their day in court 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xela Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 (edited) Thats another year Jamie has to play for, in order to pay for his wife's ego. Edited October 4, 2022 by Xela 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 18 minutes ago, villa4europe said: $1.7m in legal cost What an absolute colossal waste Total outlay for her when factoring in her costs reported to be around £3m. This is a case SHE brought against Colleen Rooney. What an idiot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Xann Posted October 4, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 4, 2022 Can't see anyone beating Vlad P to the Bellend Of The Year award, but it was an exceptionally talented field this year. 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Xela said: Thats another year Jamie has to play for, in order to pay for his wife's ego. Apparently Jamie has told her to do one and pay for the costs herself. Which is why she has agreed to do a documentary about the whole debarcle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 11 minutes ago, foreveryoung said: Apparently Jamie has told her to do one and pay for the costs herself. Which is why she has agreed to do a documentary about the whole debarcle. Has she actually committed a crime? If so I'd have thought that she wouldn't be allowed to profit off telling the story and if she did coleen would be able to claim that profit for herself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidcow Posted October 4, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted October 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, villa4europe said: Has she actually committed a crime? If so I'd have thought that she wouldn't be allowed to profit off telling the story and if she did coleen would be able to claim that profit for herself It's not a criminal offence, its a civil offence. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 40 minutes ago, villa4europe said: Has she actually committed a crime? If so I'd have thought that she wouldn't be allowed to profit off telling the story and if she did coleen would be able to claim that profit for herself Coleen has signed up to tell her side too apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xann Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 52 minutes ago, foreveryoung said: Apparently Jamie has told her to do one and pay for the costs herself. Which is why she has agreed to do a documentary about the whole debacle. YIKES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidcow Posted October 4, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted October 4, 2022 Musk deal to buy Twitter is back on. Hate this shit. The sewer that is Twitter will be diving to new lows under him for certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 (edited) 8 hours ago, sidcow said: Musk deal to buy Twitter is back on. Hate this shit. The sewer that is Twitter will be diving to new lows under him for certain. Hopefully the price collapses and he loses a fortune. Edited October 5, 2022 by Genie 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugeley Villa Posted October 8, 2022 Share Posted October 8, 2022 How accurate ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blandy Posted October 8, 2022 Moderator Share Posted October 8, 2022 1 hour ago, Rugeley Villa said: How accurate ? Not at all accurate. You can tell by maths. Here’s the sums and some general assumptions to go with them. 1. if we were to assume the population of 1 million all are football fans, then that would mean 383,000 Liverpool fans in Brum. That’s clearly a nonsense. 2. So let’s say half the population are “fans” (however they define that). 191,000 Liverpool fans? No chance. Also the table would mean 37000 noses and 83000 villans and 23000 plastic Man U…and 45, yes, forty five Albion fans in Brum. So it’s a load of Rubbish, however many “fans” live in Brum. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugeley Villa Posted October 8, 2022 Share Posted October 8, 2022 23 minutes ago, blandy said: Not at all accurate. You can tell by maths. Here’s the sums and some general assumptions to go with them. 1. if we were to assume the population of 1 million all are football fans, then that would mean 383,000 Liverpool fans in Brum. That’s clearly a nonsense. 2. So let’s say half the population are “fans” (however they define that). 191,000 Liverpool fans? No chance. Also the table would mean 37000 noses and 83000 villans and 23000 plastic Man U…and 45, yes, forty five Albion fans in Brum. So it’s a load of Rubbish, however many “fans” live in Brum. I don’t think it’s going by population. Either way I find it hard to believe . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blandy Posted October 8, 2022 Moderator Share Posted October 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, Rugeley Villa said: I don’t think it’s going by population. Either way I find it hard to believe . It says “Birmingham based”, so by definition it is based on the footballing fan population of Brum, which will be a percentage of the overall population. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugeley Villa Posted October 8, 2022 Share Posted October 8, 2022 Just now, blandy said: It says “Birmingham based”, so by definition it is based on the footballing fan population of Brum, which will be a percentage of the overall population. Yeah that’s what I meant. So we could only be talking about 300k. I doubt half the population of any town city are true football fans . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted October 8, 2022 Share Posted October 8, 2022 It also says "searches" and then declares that as support, searches on what? My first thought was that they've localised searches on say Google or worse twitter and then decided the searchers support said club Would explain why baggies are so low, them thick words removed are still drinking from the well, they're a long way off using the Internet But forget what that shows or what it thinks it shows about Liverpool vs the Midlands clubs it's the disparity between Liverpool and man utd that screams bullshit to me, both clubs are huge in brum and the Midlands but absolutely no chance are Liverpool that much bigger, or Chelsea bigger than utd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted October 8, 2022 Share Posted October 8, 2022 Extrapolated data and all that. 57% of 87 people etc as in those adverts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts