Jump to content

Match Thread: Chelsea v Villa


limpid

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sulberto21 said:

Since Ramsey has come off we've lost control. Whether we play 3 at the back or 4 we have to play 3 in the middle. 

Good performance apart from the goals conceded which were individual errors.

Stupid decision to bring him off ahead of Ings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davkaus said:

If only there was a middle ground because spending nothing on a second striker and spending £30m.

Both Watkins and Ings are too good to play backup, so we're forced into playing a fairly unconventional two up top because we've sunk millions into it. 

We're not forced to play anyone. They're playing because they a both good players. We are playing the best team and the best defence in the league. A bit of perspective needed in this thread. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, El Zen said:

To be fair, most of VillaTalk are talking about how well we’ve played and shouldn’t be losing.

Yes the people with some comprehension are quite enjoying parts of our game today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sulberto21 said:

Since Ramsey has come off we've lost control. Whether we play 3 at the back or 4 we have to play 3 in the middle. 

Good performance apart from the goals conceded which were individual errors.

No, we lost control after their second goal.  That deflated the energy we were playing with.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jim said:

Hes a wonderful footballer but I don’t see how he fits into our side. 

Shoehorning him in will be our downfall this season.

Again agree - we've brought back up for Watkins - at the expense of another player for the starting 11. Trying to be to clever.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â