snowychap Posted May 19, 2008 Author Share Posted May 19, 2008 Snowy - So it was slack on Mr Timpson's part eh? Ah well good to see No. I think we can accept that the following: It's an initiative from the local Conservative Council .. referred to the initiative from the local Conservative council that is the local county council which is Conservative-led. Can we accept now that Crewe and Nantwich borough council is not a Tory council? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drat01 Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 .ed. Can we accept now that Crewe and Nantwich borough council is not a Tory council? You can accept what you like Snowy, it's a free and fair country. Me and many others see it as a Tory council Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowychap Posted May 19, 2008 Author Share Posted May 19, 2008 Me and many others see it as a Tory council Many others and I (:winkold:)... It seems that your 'many others' are manifestly silent. Until this multitude stands up and takes a bow then I'll stick to the evidence at hand, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 I blame inflation. When I was at school 17+3+6+2 = 28 it was not<28. Or should I be looking at education, education, education In practice you see under those circumstances no party controls the council. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykeyb Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 Politics is seemingly no longer about debating issues it's more about trying to "diss" the other side Seems to apply to political debate on VT too - well for some posters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 I think the interesting thing will be the turn out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 20, 2008 Moderator Share Posted May 20, 2008 Does it matter? A politician will get elected, they will then go to parliament and don their sheep costume, it then really doesn't matter if its branded blue, red or amber. They just end up going Baaa at the right time anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloBarnesi Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 What does all of this mean for the football club? or the Railway works? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 Does it matter? A politician will get elected, they will then go to parliament and don their sheep costume, it then really doesn't matter if its branded blue, red or amber. They just end up going Baaa at the right time anywayUsing your anology, the result of this could go a long way to pointing to which ram will be running the herd in a couple of years time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 20, 2008 Moderator Share Posted May 20, 2008 Does it matter? A politician will get elected, they will then go to parliament and don their sheep costume, it then really doesn't matter if its branded blue, red or amber. They just end up going Baaa at the right time anywayUsing your anology, the result of this could go a long way to pointing to which ram will be running the herd in a couple of years time Sorry Richard but ..........It matters not, whichever ram is running the herd he'll just shag all the sheep and shit on the grass like they always do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 Yes I know you feel that way. All I can tell you is that not all politicians are like that, but thats a discussion we have had previously and neither of us will move from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.I.C.O. Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 The tide is turning against Broon now, he's starting to appear as lame and grey as John Major in the death throws of the 1992-1997 administration. If the tories win this (and I reckon they will, unfortunately) Broon has to go, someone like John McDonnell is the only saviour of the Labour Party. Broon will go down as the worst Labour leader ever. Slimy Dave will win the next election at the rate we are going, and if you think spin and PR was bad under Blair, you ain't seen nothing yet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gringo Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 I think the interesting thing will be the turn outIn what way - don't by-elections always have much higher turn outs than general elections? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 I dont think thats always the case Gringo. I'd be interested to see if this is a particularly large turnout, I think it may be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowychap Posted May 20, 2008 Author Share Posted May 20, 2008 I think the interesting thing will be the turn outIn what way - don't by-elections always have much higher turn outs than general elections? I'd have thought that too but having a look at the by election turnouts during the 2001-2005 parliament, they weren't. source - House of Commons research paper 05/34 Average by-election turnout during the 2001-05 Parliament was 37.9%. This was 16.9 percentage points lower than the average turnout in the same constituencies in the 2001 general election. The lowest by-election turnout was in recorded Ogmore (35.2%) and the highest was in Hartlepool (45.8%). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 20, 2008 Moderator Share Posted May 20, 2008 Turnouts for By-elections depend on how much media interest there is in the contest. They are usually high if there is a great deal of interest like this one, where there is actually a contest. They are low where there is no contest an no media interest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 The amount of canvassing that gets done also has an affect on turn out. I am told that a near record turnout is expected for this by-election Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 20, 2008 Moderator Share Posted May 20, 2008 And the amount of canvassing is directly proportional to the media atention / importance of the contest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 Not always the case Gareth. A lot of canvassing is done in constituency's where parties wish to update their pledge base, to get a handle on fpotential membership, how their support is going or to update records where central office for Conservative or Labour has issued new systems or updates to old systems. It can also be done by a candidate in a no win community who wishes to show his commitment and enthusiasm for the job to get a more winnable seat next time round. Seriously a lot gets done in those circumstances. What it tends to do is push up the vote a bit for the sitting MP as it pords his supporters to come out and vote for him conversley! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterms Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 Not always the case Gareth... I agree. There are different reasons for canvassing, and canvassing directly affects turnout. Of course, if you want to canvass, it helps not to have alienated your core support, or else there won't be the foot soldiers to do the work - just the phone calls from paid staff at a party office somewhere... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts