Jump to content

Generic Virus Thread


villakram

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Wezbid said:

Hopefully, when the next election comes around, this pandemic won't be at the front of people's minds anymore and people will remember what the Tory Party is all about. 

By the time the next election comes around, the focus will have moved on to how we're going to pay for all of this and there will be a massive corporate effort to make sure that bill is socialised. There's no way we'll see anything but a business/bank friendly government elected on the back of a huge media push. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HanoiVillan said:

An old favourite of the forum is up to his usual tricks I see:

Philippines president orders police to shoot dead anyone causing "trouble"

'Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte has been widely criticised by labour groups after he ordered police to shoot dead residents who cause “trouble” while quarantine rules are in place.

His violent threat follows the arrest of 21 people who had apparently taken to the streets of Metro Manila’s Quezon City to demand help from the government.

Police said the group had protested without a permit, though the website Rapper reported that it is not clear if all residents were demonstrating or if some were simply looking for food. There is growing concern about how the poorest people in the Philippines will survive a month-long lockdown that has been imposed on the country’s main Luzon island.

Many of its 48 million residents live hand-to-mouth and depend on daily work to feed their families.

The government has promised that 18 million low-income households will receive support, but this has not been released due to administrative hurdles.

On Wednesday night, Duterte told people to wait for assistance, adding: “Even if it’s delayed, it will arrive and you will not go hungry. You will not die of hunger.”

“I will not hesitate. My orders are to the police and military, also the barangay, that if there is trouble or the situation arises that people fight and your lives are on the line, shoot them dead. Do you understand? Dead. Instead of causing trouble, I’ll send you to the grave,” he said in a televised address.'

from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/apr/02/coronavirus-live-news-global-cases-latest-updates?page=with:block-5e8566c88f087564da1e42f5#block-5e8566c88f087564da1e42f5

Well he’s been ordering police executions of drug users for years now so its not such a leap for him to start murdering another group now. The man’s an absolute psychopath. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jareth said:

I'm usually wrong, but I can't help but think the combination of massive loss of life (much among Daily Mail readership demographics) and the entire country being bored at home and therefore not so busy they don't notice the politicians slipping out of taking blame for the situation - will take its toll. 

I’d love to believe this will lead to real change, but it won’t. 

10 minutes on Twitter will show you, he could stick ‘we’ll get Covid done in 12 weeks’ on the side of a bus and half the country would still believe it. 

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Villarocker said:

BMA apparently now telling doctors they will have to decide who to save and who to let die when the ventilators run out. My GP mentioned this to me last week. That's come around pretty quick. 

Apparently one hospital nearly ran out of oxygen a few days ago, so that's going to be another practical limit on how much ventilation is done as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Villarocker said:

BMA apparently now telling doctors they will have to decide who to save and who to let die when the ventilators run out. My GP mentioned this to me last week. That's come around pretty quick. 

Letters went out from one GP surgery a couple of days ago to some patients considered particularly vulnerable telling / asking them to sign a form saying they wouldn’t seek assistance as none was likely to come anyway. They wanted to keep staff and ambulances for younger fitter cases.

The reality is that was always likely to happen, the cold wording was harrowing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like ST Water have decided that it's the ideal time to close off our road for four days and dig it up in the week after Easter.

Scheduled work, i.e. not an emergency, that is going to make a lot of noise and disturbance in a residential street when people are not supposed to be leaving their homes without a reasonable excuse.

I'm glad the 'reasonable excuse' list is non-exhaustive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, snowychap said:

Seems like ST Water have decided that it's the ideal time to close off our road for four days and dig it up in the week after Easter.

Scheduled work, i.e. not an emergency, that is going to make a lot of noise and disturbance in a residential street when people are not supposed to be leaving their homes without a reasonable excuse.

I'm glad the 'reasonable excuse' list is non-exhaustive.

Usually these works are scheduled for periods when roads are quietest so this is the perfect time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Genie said:

Usually these works are scheduled for periods when roads are quietest so this is the perfect time?

Whilst that may, on the surface, seem to appeal, there are two things:

Firstly, our road is only fractionally quieter than usual during the day (a simple case of being a standard cut-through for people);

Secondly, it's not just about the effect upon traffic flow - it's the effect upon people in that residential street who are, effectively, trapped on a very noisy site for the duration of the works.

Edit: And this isn't an issue about 'not here' - I'd suggest that any non-emergency works which involve creating a significant amount of disturbance, noise, and workpeople milling around directly outside people's houses (and thus not much more than two metres from people's front gates) ought to be postponed in residential streets.

Edited by snowychap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HanoiVillan said:

Remember the letter from Corbyn that you split your sides over yesterday because it had a typo in it? 'Full PPE for medics and essential workers' was literally the first thing it demanded. This has been said, repeatedly, in Parliament.

Split my sides? Did I?  I smiled at the lack of attention to detail, which I felt typical of his amateurish abilities.

As to the point of my post above, which was no one is going to attack Labour for “politicising” the virus if they hammer away at the disgraceful failure to provide adequate PPE and testing for the NHS staff, well...?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, blandy said:

Split my sides? Did I?  I smiled at the lack of attention to detail, which I felt typical of his amateurish abilities.

As to the point of my post above, which was no one is going to attack Labour for “politicising” the virus if they hammer away at the disgraceful failure to provide adequate PPE and testing for the NHS staff, well...?

My point is, you didn't even notice that 'hammering away at the disgraceful failure to provide adequate PPE and testing' is literally what they've been doing, and it's not a surprise, because very few people are paying any attention to what the opposition are doing. In a Westminster system, the opposition are powerless to do much more than question the government in Parliament, and since Parliament is barely even open at this point it's no surprise that the meaningful political action is happening between the media and different parts of the government.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This BBC article is a very neat summary of the problem with most media reporting on this virus. Posting daily headline death tolls is misleading and generates significant fear and panic.  We need to get a rational understanding of what is going on in order to work towards the appropriate response.

Quote

Coronavirus: How to understand the death toll
Projections of how bad the outbreak could get have prompted ministers to put the country into lockdown. But what are death figures really telling us? And how bad is it going to get?

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-51979654?fbclid=IwAR0yiwoQHJbMpT4hIqXZ-LGvCY3vgxPRCE-QERk4dYQtuLIspGqOTqMsdlI

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

British Gas have decided to dig up the end of our street too.

I suspect, they’ve had more calls about a faint smell of grass at the junction at the head of the street. But its quite a busy street, when I leave on an early at 5:00am or get home late late and the roads are quiet, you can definitely smell gas. I mean always, for years.

The reduction in traffic levels means I guess that isn’t being dispersed or masked by other fumes, so more people have noticed it at busier times of day.

They’ll wander around behind their little plastic barricade, they’ll do some drilling, they’ll fill it in. Then, when life returns to normal, I’ll get up early to get on the road to somewhere distant, and there will be the faint reassuring homely smell of gas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chrisp65 said:

British Gas have decided to dig up the end of our street too.

I suspect, they’ve had more calls about a faint smell of grass at the junction at the head of the street. But its quite a busy street, when I leave on an early at 5:00am or get home late late and the roads are quiet, you can definitely smell gas. I mean always, for years.

The reduction in traffic levels means I guess that isn’t being dispersed or masked by other fumes, so more people have noticed it at busier times of day.

They’ll wander around behind their little plastic barricade, they’ll do some drilling, they’ll fill it in. Then, when life returns to normal, I’ll get up early to get on the road to somewhere distant, and there will be the faint reassuring homely smell of gas.

Yes, that's definitely something they'll be on top of sharpish

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, snowychap said:

Secondly, it's not just about the effect upon traffic flow - it's the effect upon people in that residential street who are, effectively, trapped on a very noisy site for the duration of the works.

This reminded me of something my wife said the other day. She works for the council and someone had called up to complain about the noise from their neighbour, they said what sort of noise is it? It’s children playing in the garden. Well, why is it a problem? They said because they were having to work from home children shouldn’t be allowed to make noise in the garden as they find it distracting :lol: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â