andykeenan Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Friday Premier League Sheff Utd v West Ham 8pm SS2 Saturday Premier League TV Games Palace v Arsenal 12.30pm BTSport 1 Spurs v Liverpool 5.30pm SS2 Chelsea v Burnley Everton v Brighton Leicester v Southampton Man Utd v Norwich Wolves v Newcastle MOTD 10.30pm Championship Brentford v QPR 12.30pm SS3 Barnsle v Huddersfield Blackburn v Preston Charlton v Albion Hull v Fulham Leeds v Sheff Wed Luton v Small Heath Middlesbrough v Derby Reading v Forest Stoke v Millwall Wigan v Bristol City EFL on Quest 9pm Sunday Premier League Super Sunday Bournmouth v Watford 2pm SS2 MOTD 2 10.30pm Championship Cardiff v Swansea 12pm SS3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VT Supporter S-Platt Posted January 10, 2020 VT Supporter Share Posted January 10, 2020 43 minutes ago, andykeenan said: Barnsle v Huddersfield 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, andykeenan said: Bournmouth v Watford 2pm SS2 Edited January 10, 2020 by sne 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villaphan04 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Something that (potentially) could impact the rest of the season. Fabianski had to be subbed off for injury in his return from an injury... Don't know how bad it could Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidlewis Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 VAR done us a favour with West Ham this weekend? sounds very controversial to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rev Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 It was ball to hand, but my gut instinct was handball before Snodgrass even shot. If I were West Ham I'd be more annoyed about the goalkeeping situation at the club, Fabianski can't say fit and everybody else on their books seem to be part of some kind of Peter Enckelman tribute act. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Just signed Randolph, capable enough backup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hornso Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, Zatman said: Just signed Randolph, capable enough backup Felt for Martin after making that mistake but I bet their fans are a lot happier, having a more experience and capable back up. Edited January 11, 2020 by Hornso Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimzk5 Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 7 hours ago, The_Rev said: It was ball to hand, but my gut instinct was handball before Snodgrass even shot. If I were West Ham I'd be more annoyed about the goalkeeping situation at the club, Fabianski can't say fit and everybody else on their books seem to be part of some kind of Peter Enckelman tribute Isn't any contact between ball and hand now deemed handball by VAR under the new rules this season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chips'ngravy Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 7 hours ago, Zatman said: Just signed Randolph, capable enough backup Don't think he's signed yet, plus he's injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chips'ngravy Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Just watched it. Can't see why they're up in arms about it. Intentional or not he used his hand to control the ball. Without it Rice would've lost the ball and the chance would never have been created. Good result for us, keeps them down there, they feel hard done by and they have a dodgy keeper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VT Supporter chappy Posted January 11, 2020 VT Supporter Share Posted January 11, 2020 I’d be fuming if we had a goal disallowed for that. Really disagree with this new interpretation of the rule. Yes the bell hit his hand but he couldn’t have got it out of the way and if it had happened in his own penalty area I don’t think VAR would’ve given a penalty. Snodgrass loves that end in added time though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rev Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 The law is an ass, it was clearly ball to hand but this is what we signed up for with VAR. My view is just that I saw the handball before Rice had even passed the ball to Snodgrass so I wasn't surprised when it was given. I might be imagining it but I'm sure that there is a shout from the crowd for handball too, certainly the people sitting on the same side as the TV camera would have seen it. There would probably have been as much of a shitstorm if the goal had stood and Sheffield United had pointed to the handball in the buildup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Pangloss Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 McBurnie tried his best to miss that, what a shite finish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VT Supporter Stevo985 Posted January 11, 2020 VT Supporter Share Posted January 11, 2020 The clarification of the handball law means that's a clear handball. Contact with the hand that gives an advantage to the attacker is an offence now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VT Supporter fightoffyour Posted January 11, 2020 VT Supporter Share Posted January 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Stevo985 said: The clarification of the handball law means that's a clear handball. Contact with the hand that gives an advantage to the attacker is an offence now. This, and 2 hours ago, chappy said: I’d be fuming if we had a goal disallowed for that. Really disagree with this new interpretation of the rule. Yes the bell hit his hand but he couldn’t have got it out of the way and if it had happened in his own penalty area I don’t think VAR would’ve given a penalty. Snodgrass loves that end in added time though! I don't think the rule is the same for defending, so no it wouldn't be a penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VT Supporter chappy Posted January 11, 2020 VT Supporter Share Posted January 11, 2020 1 hour ago, fightoffyour said: This, and I don't think the rule is the same for defending, so no it wouldn't be a penalty. That’s what I meant, I don’t think that’s fair! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumstopdogs Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 4 hours ago, chappy said: I’d be fuming if we had a goal disallowed for that. Really disagree with this new interpretation of the rule. Yes the bell hit his hand but he couldn’t have got it out of the way and if it had happened in his own penalty area I don’t think VAR would’ve given a penalty. Snodgrass loves that end in added time though! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danishlad Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 80 % possession to Arsenal away at Palace. My word Palace have been awful the first 26 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Said before if rice bundles the ball over the line in that fashion, see also Rodriguez vs us, then fair enough call it handball But this with the build up and then the nonsense over phase of play when VVD did it last week is just **** shite, it is unfair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts