Jump to content

Marvelous Nakamba


NurembergVillan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LondonLax said:

Well wouldn’t have had to shut them down so much if he didn’t keep giving them the ball 😄

A few of our players seem a lot happier when we don’t have possession and can fall back to just defending. 

Third best passing accuracy tonight and was dispossessed once. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sulberto21 said:

In one passage Leicester could have had an easy attack but Nakamba and the other two scapegoats Luiz and AEG clamped their respective runners and Leicester had to go back and their crowd booed slightly with a huge groan too. 

Yes they made good plays at times. Mentioning a good play doesn't suddenly mean they didn't make bad plays either. Or they didn't make more bad plays than good ones.

A scapegoat implies that they are being unfairly blamed for something. But in the case of Luiz, he very clearly and directly cost us a goal. How is that scapegoating?

Edited by Laughable Chimp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LondonLax said:

I can believe it because he only plays short passes but from watching the match so many of those passes put teammates under pressure.

We were playing one of the best teams in the league who are famous for their high pressing system. Of course it was going to be difficult. What standards do you have for players when we go away to a top 4 team?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lexicon said:

We were playing one of the best teams in the league who are famous for their high pressing system. Of course it was going to be difficult. What standards do you have for players when we go away to a top 4 team?

We’re are aiming to become a competitive team in this league ourselves. He’s one of a handful of players who needs to improve (or be improved on) if we are going to get there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Johnnyp said:

So let's stop trusting what our eyes see then and defer to stats, that's what's it come to. Dear oh dear

No, let's refer to the stats when bullshit claims are made. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LondonLax said:

We’re are aiming to become a competitive team in this league ourselves. He’s one of a handful of players who needs to improve (or be improved on) if we are going to get there. 

And we just got a draw away at Leicester, partially in thanks to the defensive work he did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lexicon said:

No, let's refer to the stats when bullshit claims are made. 

Like what ? That he doesn't know what to do when he's pressed. Offers no real protection to the back four. Lay off the stats and use your own eyes, stats can make westwood look like iniesta.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Laughable Chimp said:

Yes they made good plays at times. Mentioning a good play doesn't suddenly mean they didn't make bad plays either. Or they didn't make more bad plays than good ones.

A scapegoat implies that they are being unfairly blamed for something. But in the case of Luiz, he very clearly and directly cost us a goal. How is that scapegoating?

He was given a suicidal pass from a free kick when it should have gone in to the channel for a fresh young lively youngster to chase and be a pest (Konsa) . Iheanacho outmuscled Hause and was too quick for Mings with the shot yet Luiz is the only being blamed. Yes he was partly at fault for not protecting the ball better initially but was everything that transpired after that his fault?
 

Defensively our team played well ,only on occasion did the 3rd best team in England have clear chances. When they did our brilliant young keeper saved us whilst making it look easy. 
 

The players in bold were directly involved with the play that led to their goal meaning they could have had an impact in stopping their goal.  You forgot Douglas Luiz’s tackles blocks and interceptions from the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â