Jump to content

Matt Targett


villan-scott

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, bobzy said:

Absolutely phenomenal. 

People need to stop talking about left back being a weak link. 

It only is in terms of depth - Taylor is a massive downgrade. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MaVilla said:

was it his hamstring?, cus last time it was that he was absent for a couple of weeks at least.......that not good when we have 4 more games in 10 days or so?

Taylor 🤮

Hopefully just a light muscle strain. Certainly didn't look too bad when he was walking off.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jacketspuds said:

I would rather we stick McGinn at LB than Taylor if we are going to be missing Targett for a while.

especially if we buy sanson, sanson in for Mcginn, Mcginn to LB :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MaVilla said:

especially if we buy sanson, sanson in for Mcginn, Mcginn to LB :P

As much of a last resort it would be, I genuinely think McGinn would do a decent job at LB. He has the engine for it, is tenacious and has a great left foot. Would be miles better than Taylor, even if we didn't bring in Sanson for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jacketspuds said:

As much of a last resort it would be, I genuinely think McGinn would do a decent job at LB. He has the engine for it, is tenacious and has a great left foot. Would be miles better than Taylor, even if we didn't bring in Sanson for a while.

i agree, i think mcginn would be a way better temp LB than Taylor, taylor shouldnt be allowed to wear a villa shirt again tbh, nice guy, terrible fottballer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â