Jump to content

Women's World Cup 2019


KMitch

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, bannedfromHandV said:

I wish sky and bbc would separate the mens and womens football news..........they should have their own sites. I could not care a toss about anything happening in the world of womens football.

Yet have made numerous posts in a womens World Cup thread 😉

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so which fits you?

Think I might fit in on quite a few of these :D 

But then again as always this piece is written to provoke and is simplifying things to do so.

Has it's points thou.

Quote

Pity the poor man who’s had the Women’s World Cup shoved down his throat

 

Once again I am hugely grateful to the community that will not allow us to forget the great under-reported story of this Women’s World Cup: men. Most specifically, the men who are not watching it. We hear so much about the tournament itself. Too much, it is argued – and at the expense of one of the four great civil rights questions of our era: 1) When are we getting a White History Month? 2) When is International Men’s Day? 3) Isn’t it time we had Straight Pride? and 4) Can you imagine how sexist people would say it was if we had a men’s World Cup?

I could not agree more with the gentlemen who dare to ask these questions – and not just so that I can buy time while I frantically locate the exit. Indeed, as part of this column’s tireless commitment to celebrating the underdogs, this week let’s redress the dangerous cosmic imbalance caused by the Women’s World Cup. Here follows a celebration of all the different guys who currently need to explain to you – at length – why they aren’t watching it. As always, you don’t have to be a woman to have met some of these men over the past week. But it certainly helps!

Mr Stop Shoving It Down My Throat

Listen, this guy is absolutely fine with this tournament existing, being alive, whatever. He’s open-minded – it’s not the dark ages any more. Nothing against it. What he objects to – and he’d like you to know that you’ll find a lot of other perfectly decent people like him – is it being “shoved down his throat”. Yes, it’s the shoving. Down the throat. It’s like: fine. I’m happy for you to do your football in the privacy of your own wherever, but please: have some sensitivity and realise that not all people are like you. So basically just don’t do it in front of him, or involve him. Seriously: don’t involve him. Also don’t do it near his kids, especially the girl. For reference, ways that it can be shoved down his throat include “being on TV” and “being on a website he normally looks at”, for instance that of the British Broadcasting Corporation, which, by covering a sport that averaged 4.6 million viewers on Sunday night for England’s game against Scotland, is pursuing a right-on agenda. Actually, let’s be real for a minute: no one wants to see this. Put it away.

Mr I’m Being Branded Sexist

This guy is fairly sure he’s being “branded sexist” for not watching the Women’s World Cup. I think if you need to ask “by who, specifically?” then in a very strong but also abstract sense you’re part of the problem. He is definitely getting this definite feeling that he is being made to feel sexist. It’s all part of an agenda. No, he’d rather not continue this conversation. He can’t win, because you just can’t say anything these days.

Mr Inferior Product

Nothing but respect for the guy who declares “the game’s gone” about every tiny piece of commercialisation in men’s football, but falls over himself to describe the women’s game as “an inferior product”. I mean, on the one hand, a reminder: if you refer to football as either “product” or “content” – ever – you are an endless rocket polisher. No exceptions. But on the other: I’m sure it felt like an interesting point when you made it. Your points are not inferior products: keep producing them to surplus.

Mr I Prefer Parks

No one more than me wants to help the guy whose chief point about the 2019 World Cup is: “I would so much rather watch parks football on a Sunday morning.” I would also rather he did this.

Mr Stop Telling Me It’s Massive When It’s Really Not

Totally. But dude: read that one over and then probably just delete it. I know you’d hate for anyone to take it out of context. And that’s what they do; they take things out of context and then they twist what you say.

Mr I Always Support England

Always supports England, no matter what. No one loves his country more than him. But this isn’t “England” by any reasonable yardstick. Which bit of England do they represent then? Not a bit he recognises.

Mr Have Fifa Got A Point

I love this guy, who has spent years – decades – scoffing that Fifa are a bunch of incompetent chisellers who leech money out of the game, and do less than the bare minimum to grow it while lining their own pockets. Unbelievable that they don’t pay local taxes and have a cash surplus of $2.7bn when they should be a force for good. But this chap looks at the fact that the men’s World Cup prize fund is $400m, that the women’s is $30m. He knows he can’t fall back on viewing figure ratios, given that the men’s gets four times the viewers of the women’s, but 13 times the prize money. And he knows the gap between the men’s and women’s prize fund has actually risen over the past four years. Even so, and for reasons he can’t quite put his finger on: haven’t Fifa got a point in just this one case? Oh, just to be clear, that’s a rhetorical question. Which means you don’t get to answer it.

Mr I’m Just Not Watching

Short of hearing what other people dreamed about last night, hearing which things other people aren’t watching on television is even better. Have you never seen an episode of Game of Thrones? Do you dislike Love Island? Are you not watching the Women’s World Cup? If so, this is massive. Make sure to tell as many people as possible today.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2019/jun/12/womens-world-cup-shoved-down-mens-throats

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ponky said:

Representation matters hugely. Why should men's sport be considered the default setting? 

Just heading to bed at 2am having sat up with my daughter watching Australia come back from 2-0 to Brazil. The world cup matters hugely to her.

She plays  at an all-female club that has produced a number international representatives, including a few members of the present Australian team. They take their football seriously. Sure the standard is not the same, but the theatre and the passion is no different. And indeed the relative absence of pompous, overpaid, self-important Representatives for Wellingborough makes it all the more refreshing. 

And my 15yo son has NEVER stayed up late watching football with me. 

It shouldn't. But in this case the World Cup has been around since 1930 while the women's WC has been around (unofficially)since 1970 and as a proper tournament since 1991.

Women football is piggybacking on the men's game, and that's fine. But it is 2 different things. (IMO)

Edited by sne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, sne said:

It shouldn't. But in this case the World Cup has been around since 1930 while the women's WC has been around (unofficially)since 1970 and as a proper tournament since 1991.

Women football is piggybacking on the men's game, and that's fine. But it is 2 different things. (IMO)

This is just elevating the default sexism of the early twentieth century into some grand principle isn't it? It doesn't say anything spectacular about men's football that it has been around for longer. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, HanoiVillan said:

This is just elevating the default sexism of the early twentieth century into some grand principle isn't it? It doesn't say anything spectacular about men's football that it has been around for longer. 

No, it's naming rights, recognition, marketing and commercial deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with regards to Mens and Womens World Cup, Tennis, Rugby, Cricket and so on.

Should The FA not rename themselves the English FA by that rationale?

Aston Villa Mens as we have Aston Villa Ladies?

I think what I am saying is whatever came first should stay as it is.

As for the Womens World Cup I am enjoying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The short goalkeeper thing was definitely on show in the scotland/japan game earlier.

Japans first goal in particular, Scottish keeper was even stood on her line, japanese player hit a high shot straight at the keeper that didn't crash in off the underside of the bar or anything but the keeper simply wasn't tall enough to stop it and it just went over her head.

Scotlands goal wasn't much different really but to be fair the japanese keeper was a yard or so off her line but again a simple shot straight over her head.

If you can not touch the crossbar you're always going to be in trouble

Edited by LakotaDakota
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HanoiVillan said:

France looked pretty uninspired there. I've now seen all three of their games, and they've gotten progressively worse each time. 

And like the men’s team they get all the luck 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â