Dr_Pangloss Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 2 hours ago, bobzy said: I don't understand why there'd be such a long delay... ...but I equally don't understand why there's such uproar about correct decisions being made. Strange world. Being "right" absolutely does not justify what happened in that game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaChris Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 There needs to be a time limit on things, say two minutes. (ref told there might be an issue and then he spends a minute looking at the screen on the sidelines). I agree it was the right decision last night but for the teams to go off the pitch and be then called back is laughable. From the incident to the kick being taken took around 7 minutes. That simply isn't good enough. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Posted April 19, 2018 VT Supporter Share Posted April 19, 2018 Can't believe they are going to use this in the world cup, it's nowhere near useable at the moment. It going to be a shambles! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Posted April 19, 2018 VT Supporter Share Posted April 19, 2018 The system should be used in the background but should be limited to 1 or 2 calls per team per game, coming at the teams request; like tennis uses it at the moment. The choice should be limited in time too so everyone knows where they are. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a m ole Posted April 19, 2018 Share Posted April 19, 2018 nah, the challenge system is ridiculous. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Posted April 20, 2018 VT Supporter Share Posted April 20, 2018 10 hours ago, a m ole said: nah, the challenge system is ridiculous. You are a better poster than that a m ole, explain your reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 People are still against this then? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_avfc Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 5 hours ago, bobzy said: People are still against this then? Completely agree with this. Today’s game showed why this (even with its teething difficulties) can only be a good thing for the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted May 27, 2018 Share Posted May 27, 2018 I think ramos gets sent off, thats probably it from yesterday, i dont think any of the officials saw it The stamp on grealish the 4th official has seen it its right in front of him and he doesnt give it or advise its a red, what makes you think another ref watching it on tv would give it? The grealish tackle again i think the ref has seen it and given a yellow, theres no guarantee you wouldnt have the same answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted May 28, 2018 Author VT Supporter Share Posted May 28, 2018 On 27/05/2018 at 13:19, villa4europe said: The stamp on grealish the 4th official has seen it its right in front of him and he doesnt give it or advise its a red, what makes you think another ref watching it on tv would give it? Is this a serious question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted May 28, 2018 Share Posted May 28, 2018 6 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: Is this a serious question? yes VAR automatically means thats a red card? why? 4th official saw it and obviously thought it was accidental, who's to say VAR ref wouldn't think the same i dont buy in to the belief that VAR would give us the decisions we want, the level of ineptitude would continue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted May 28, 2018 Author VT Supporter Share Posted May 28, 2018 31 minutes ago, villa4europe said: yes VAR automatically means thats a red card? why? 4th official saw it and obviously thought it was accidental, who's to say VAR ref wouldn't think the same i dont buy in to the belief that VAR would give us the decisions we want, the level of ineptitude would continue No it doesn't automatically mean that at all. But VAR isn't just there to catch things that officials have totally missed. It's to give them a better look at incidents that they may have seen wrongly. You really don't think that there's a very good chance that a ref reviewing that footage would have given a red card? I just don't understand this train of thought that continues to roll of "Well it doesn't GUARANTEE the right decision should be made, so it's pointless" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 (edited) As I always stated VAR is fantastic Honestly thou I was really baffled that they stopped the game in mid attack for Korea to review it. Imagine if it wasn't given as a penalty after review and they had robbed Korea of a good attack opportunity... Edited June 18, 2018 by sne 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 battenburg is right in his analysis, they got the decision right in the end but it wasnt a hard decision and the ref had a great view, FIFA should have refs good enough to get it right in the 1st place 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanoiVillan Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 1 minute ago, villa4europe said: battenburg is right in his analysis, they got the decision right in the end but it wasnt a hard decision and the ref had a great view, FIFA should have refs good enough to get it right in the 1st place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 16 minutes ago, villa4europe said: battenburg is right in his analysis, they got the decision right in the end but it wasnt a hard decision and the ref had a great view, FIFA should have refs good enough to get it right in the 1st place But no ref is that fit to keep up with play. He made howlers in his time Why did he not see that Pedro Mendes goal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VILLAMARV Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 Clear and obvious right? I'm guessing they wouldn't have called the ref over mid-game to have a look mid-attack unless it was obvious Korea shouldn't even have had the ball. Be more uproar if Korea had banged it in from 30 yards and had it disallowed and a penalty given against them instead. That's a perfect example of how it should be used imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 Refs becoming redundant as expected. Linesmen not even supposed to wave for offside anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 36 minutes ago, VILLAMARV said: Clear and obvious right? I'm guessing they wouldn't have called the ref over mid-game to have a look mid-attack unless it was obvious Korea shouldn't even have had the ball. Be more uproar if Korea had banged it in from 30 yards and had it disallowed and a penalty given against them instead. That's a perfect example of how it should be used imo. yeah that did cross my mind, they are stuck in a risky place there, if they dont give the penalty then SK will rightly be extremely pissed off, if they had delayed the decision any longer then it was a decent looking attack if its being called back bet your house on it being given Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 So do they just review decisions not given or did they just review that and think the ref got it right? Because that was a shocker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts