chrisvilla4 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Getting fed up with this Henry malarkey 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post darrenm Posted January 11, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted January 11, 2017 2 hours ago, sir_gary_cahill said: I've always thought he was a fantastic player, even when he was 16 years old at Arsenal Balls. I was hoping he'd be decent. 17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMAICAN-VILLAN Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 2 hours ago, One For The Road said: I'd be very uneasy about signing a player who throws his toys out of the pram to engineer a move. If that's what he does of course. Would you rather he just chilled and kept it low key at Forest till the end of the season then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted January 11, 2017 Moderator Share Posted January 11, 2017 3 hours ago, One For The Road said: I'd be very uneasy about signing a player who throws his toys out of the pram to engineer a move. If that's what he does of course. Hope you landed safely, the was quite a leap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted January 11, 2017 Moderator Share Posted January 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Paul33 said: Lansbury will be announced at 3pm Thursday ........... ....... according to Twitter !!! Well that would be remarkable given Forest are still under a transfer embargo! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeVillan Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 16 minutes ago, TrentVilla said: Well that would be remarkable given Forest are still under a transfer embargo! Does that usually include letting players go? I always assumed it was to prevent acquisitions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VILLAMARV Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, TreeVillan said: Does that usually include letting players go? I always assumed it was to prevent acquisitions. See that Asset you thought you were paying for? Well it's not there anymore alright mate? Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted January 11, 2017 Moderator Share Posted January 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, TreeVillan said: Does that usually include letting players go? I always assumed it was to prevent acquisitions. Ah... after a little research I think you are correct. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted January 11, 2017 Moderator Share Posted January 11, 2017 Just now, VILLAMARV said: See that Asset you thought you were paying for? Well it's not there anymore alright mate? Cheers. The embargo isn't because of the takeover it's because they are late filling accounts with the EFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VILLAMARV Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, TrentVilla said: The embargo isn't because of the takeover it's because they are late filling accounts with the EFL. Yes I can wind my neck in thanks for asking 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 35 minutes ago, TrentVilla said: Well that would be remarkable given Forest are still under a transfer embargo! If I'm not mistaken that does not apply when selling players just purchasing them 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One For The Road Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 58 minutes ago, TrentVilla said: Hope you landed safely, the was quite a leap ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrytini Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 4 hours ago, One For The Road said: I'd be very uneasy about signing a player who throws his toys out of the pram to engineer a move. If that's what he does of course. Like Benteke did to come here ? Thatll do me ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villa Stu Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 1 hour ago, TrentVilla said: Ah... after a little research I think you are correct. I thought you could also replace a player when sold as long as they did not exceed the value of the sale (fee & wages) I may be wrong though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upper north stander Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Medical tomorrow! according to agent Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAuthority Posted January 12, 2017 VT Supporter Share Posted January 12, 2017 5 hours ago, Upper north stander said: Medical tomorrow! according to agent Dave So rock solid then. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Some papers say medical booked....meanwhile others saying 3m bid rejected. So in other words all guess work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexbelowsound Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 I've been led to believe this will happen. Spoiler But also it might not. #itkjourno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilko154 Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Am I right in saying he will need to sign today in order to play on Saturday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hippo Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 (edited) Even if the embargo for forest is on purchases - wouldn't that mean they are less likely to release Lansbury as they wouldn't be allowed to bring in a replacement. Edited January 12, 2017 by hippo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts