• limpid

      Just visiting?   27/12/16

      Please click "Sign Up" and login to use the full functionality of the site.
Phumfeinz

Henri Lansbury

997 posts in this topic

JAMAICAN-VILLAN    3,641
2 hours ago, One For The Road said:

I'd be very uneasy about signing a player who throws his toys out of the pram to engineer a move. If that's what he does of course. 

Would you rather he just chilled and kept it low key at Forest till the end of the season then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TrentVilla    15,152
3 hours ago, One For The Road said:

I'd be very uneasy about signing a player who throws his toys out of the pram to engineer a move. If that's what he does of course. 

Hope you landed safely, the was quite a leap ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TrentVilla    15,152
1 hour ago, Paul33 said:

Lansbury will be announced at 3pm Thursday ...........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

....... according to Twitter !!!

Well that would be remarkable given Forest are still under a transfer embargo!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TreeVillan    384
16 minutes ago, TrentVilla said:

Well that would be remarkable given Forest are still under a transfer embargo!

Does that usually include letting players go? I always assumed it was to prevent acquisitions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VILLAMARV    1,597
3 minutes ago, TreeVillan said:

Does that usually include letting players go? I always assumed it was to prevent acquisitions. 

See that Asset you thought you were paying for? Well it's not there anymore alright mate? Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TrentVilla    15,152
4 minutes ago, TreeVillan said:

Does that usually include letting players go? I always assumed it was to prevent acquisitions. 

Ah... after a little research I think you are correct.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TrentVilla    15,152
Just now, VILLAMARV said:

See that Asset you thought you were paying for? Well it's not there anymore alright mate? Cheers.

The embargo isn't because of the takeover it's because they are late filling accounts with the EFL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VILLAMARV    1,597
5 minutes ago, TrentVilla said:

The embargo isn't because of the takeover it's because they are late filling accounts with the EFL.

Yes I can wind my neck in thanks for asking :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Demitri_C    4,556
35 minutes ago, TrentVilla said:

Well that would be remarkable given Forest are still under a transfer embargo!

If I'm not mistaken that does not apply when selling players just purchasing them

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
terrytini    3,897
4 hours ago, One For The Road said:

I'd be very uneasy about signing a player who throws his toys out of the pram to engineer a move. If that's what he does of course. 

Like Benteke did to come here ?

Thatll do me !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Villa Stu    69
1 hour ago, TrentVilla said:

Ah... after a little research I think you are correct.

I thought you could also replace a player when sold as long as they did not exceed the value of the sale (fee & wages) I may be wrong though 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TheAuthority    1,170
5 hours ago, Upper north stander said:

Medical tomorrow!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

according to agent Dave :ph34r:

So rock solid then.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hippo    740

Even if the embargo for forest is on purchases - wouldn't that mean they are less likely to release Lansbury as they wouldn't be allowed to bring in a replacement. 

Edited by hippo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites